The aim of this study was to determine whether an intensive stretch program increases muscle extensibility or subjects' tolerance to an uncomfortable stretch sensation. Twenty healthy able-bodied individuals with limited hamstring muscle extensibility were recruited. A within-subjects design was used whereby one leg of each subject was randomly allocated to the experimental condition and the other leg was allocated to the control condition. The hamstring muscles of each subject's experimental leg were stretched for 20 minutes each weekday for four weeks. Hamstring muscle extensibility (angle of hip flexion corresponding with a standardised torque) and stretch tolerance (angle of hip flexion corresponding with maximal torque tolerated) were assessed on both legs at the beginning and end of the study. The intervention did not increase the extensibility of the hamstring muscles (mean change in hip flexion was -1 degree, 95% CI -4 to 3 degrees) but did increase subjects' tolerance to an uncomfortable stretch sensation (mean change in hip flexion was 8 degrees, 95% CI 5 to 12 degrees). These results highlight the importance of distinguishing between real and apparent increases in muscle extensibility when assessing the effectiveness of stretch, and indicate that whilst a four-week stretch program increases subjects' tolerance to an uncomfortable stretch sensation it does not increase hamstring muscle extensibility.

The aim was to investigate the effects of isotonic resistance exercise on the electro-myographic (EMG) activity of the jaw muscles during standardised jaw movements. In 12 asymptomatic adults surface EMG activity was recorded from the anterior temporalis and masseter muscles bilaterally and the right anterior digastric muscle during right lateral jaw movements that tracked a target. Participants were randomly assigned to a Control group or an Exercise group. Jaw movement and EMG activity were collected (i) at baseline, before the exercise task (pre-exercise); (ii) immediately after the exercise task (isotonic resistance at 60% MVC against right lateral jaw movements); (iii) after 4 weeks of a home-based exercise programme; and, (iv) at 8-weeks follow-up. There were no significant within-subject or between-group differences in the velocity and amplitude of the right lateral jaw movements either within or between data collection sessions (P > 0.05). However, over the 8 weeks of the study, three of the tested EMG variables (EMG Duration, Time to Peak EMG from EMG Onset, and Time to Peak EMG activity relative to Movement Onset) showed significant (P < 0.05) differences in the five tested muscles. Many of the significant changes occurred in the Control group, while the Exercise group tended to maintain the majority of the tested variables at pre-exercise baseline values. The data suggest a level of variability between recording sessions in the recruitment patterns of some of the muscles of mastication for the production of the same right lateral jaw movement and that isotonic resistance exercise may reduce this variability.