Background: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are debilitating to the patients and significantly impair their quality of life. DFU associated with infection have the worst outcomes and may lead to amputations if timely intervention is not done. In the present study, aim was to identify the association between the type of organism isolated and the rates of amputations in diabetic foot ulcers.Methods: We retrospectively studied 50 diabetic foot ulcers from January 2017 to June 2017, who were in-patients in a single unit of surgery department in King George Hospital, Visakhapatnam. Baseline clinical examination was done. Parameters such as age, sex, duration, diabetic status and its treatment, organisms isolated, various treatment options for ulcers and the outcomes were studies.Results: Males were the predominant study subjects (M: F=32:18). The age of presentation was 18-65 years with an average of 46 years. Gram negative organisms were the frequent microbial isolates, all being mono-microbial infections. It was dominated by E. coli (17), Pseudomonas (12) and Klebsiella (11). Above-knee amputation was done in one patient and below-knee amputations in three patients. Total mortality in our study was 5. After applying the chi-square test, it was found that there is no significant association between the type of organism and the rate of amputations in our study.Conclusions: Diabetes is a significant risk factor for ulceration in the extremities, which possesses considerable mortality and morbidity. Early intervention, control of diabetes and compliance of the patient treatment are all necessary to reduce the rates of amputations and mortality in patients with diabetic foot ulcers.
Background: Aim of the study was to find accuracy of pre-operative fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TIRADS) in predicting the nature of nodular goitre and confirming it with post-operative biopsy. Objective of the study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of FNAC compared with post-operative biopsy and to assess the sensitivity and specificity of TIRADS compared with post-operative biopsy.Methods: This retrospective study was carried out at tertiary hospital, King George Hospital, Visakhapatnam over a period of 1 year from march 2018 to march 2019. Sensitivity and specificity are calculated based on formulae.Results: Sample size calculated with 90% confidence interval for population of vizag is 96, a sample of 100 patients were taken in this study. Of the 100 cases, 16 had thyroid carcinoma. 15 of them were papillary carcinoma and 1 follicular carcinoma. 8 cases matched with cytology report after post op biopsy and 8 we mismatched with cytology report after post op biopsy. The incidence of malignancy in clinically and cytologically benign goitre is 8.69. In our study sensitivity of FNAC is 50%, specificity is 100% and accuracy of test is 92% and TIRADS has a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 72.62% and an accuracy of 77%.Conclusions: The current study has showed the disparity we see in thyroid neoplasms in FNAC test and TIRADS, which were proved to be different diagnosis in clinical and histopathology, so even if cytology is benign, we can’t rule out malignancy. FNAC and TIRADS combined have more sensitivity and specificity than individual tests.
Introduction: Appendicitis is one of the most common surgical pathologies. It is classified into complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis. Neutrophil Lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an easily available lab parameter which can be used to differentiate complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis. Aims and objectives: To identify the reliability of NLR as a predictor of complicated appendicitis and to study the association of increased NLR with complicated appendicitis, among the cases of appendicitis who presented to our tertiary care centre. Methodology: This a retrospective study of all the cases operated for appendicitis in surgical department of Dr. Pinnamaneni Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Foundation over a period of 2 years. Clinical details were retrieved from case records and data was analysed using IBM SPSS version 21. Results and conclusion: Total sample size was 250 , Mean age 30.6 ±15.294 years.The mean value of the NLR for Complicated appendicitis based on ROC analysis is 7.3 ± 2.98 and area under ROC curve was 0.7, with a Sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 65% for predicting complicated appendicitis. NLR is a reliable preoperative investigation to predict complicated appendicitis.
Background: Surgical site infections are one of the most common complications in the postoperative period leading to increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stay and reduced quality of life. The present study aims to identify the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI), risk factors, causative organisms, and their sensitivity patterns in patients who have undergone elective abdominal surgeries.Methods: A prospective study containing 200 patients who have undergone elective abdominal surgeries from May 2018 to January 2020 were evaluated. A thorough history was taken in all the patients. A detailed clinical examination and routine investigations were done. Parameters such as body mass index (BMI), diabetic status, type of surgery, wound grading, culture, and sensitivity patterns were considered. The patients underwent treatment based on their investigatory reports.Results: In the present study, 54 patients developed surgical site infection, and among them, 22 are diabetics. Only ten patients with normal BMI developed SSI, whereas the other 44 patients who developed SSI had abnormal BMI. The incidence of SSI was higher in clean-contaminated surgeries comprising up to 89% of cases. Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly isolated organism, and cefoperazone plus sulbactam was the most sensitive on antibiogram.Conclusions: The surgical site infections are on rising trend due to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms. Treatment of the underlying risk factors, regular wound dressings, and antibiotics, according to sensitivity patterns, are the mainstay.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.