No abstract

The most common forms of familial thrombophilia are factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin mutation (PTM). Homozygous FVL and PTM have long been feared conditions thought to cause high rates of morbidity and mortality. To analyse clinical features in patients with homozygous FVL and PTM, as well as patients with double heterozygosity for FVL and PTM. All patients with homozygous FVL, PTM or double heterozygosity in the MATS database of 1465 consecutive unselected patients were analysed regarding age at inclusion venous thromboembolism (VTE), age at first thrombosis, recurrence, clinical course and acquired risk factors. We found 36 patients homozygous for FVL. Patients homozygous for FVL were younger than controls at group level (56 ± 18 vs. 63 ± 17, p < 0.02). Homozygous women were younger than female controls (50 ± 19 vs. 63 ± 18, p < 0.002). No difference was observed when comparing male subjects. Women were younger than men at inclusion thrombosis (50 ± 19 vs. 65 ± 14, p < 0.02) and at first thrombosis (47 ± 19 vs. 64 ± 14, p < 0.01). Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was seen in 33 patients (92 %), 6 (17 %) had pulmonary embolism (PE) and 3 (8 %) had combined DVT and PE. PE was less frequent in homozygous FVL women compared to female controls (p < 0.03). VTE recurred in 3 subjects during the duration of the study. Odds ratio for VTE in homozygous FVL patients compared to controls was 13.9 (95 % CI 9.9-19.7). We found no subjects with homozygous PTM. Double heterozygosity for FVL and PTM was seen in 12 subjects. There was no difference in age at inclusion VTE between double heterozygotes and controls (59 ± 16 vs. 63 ± 17, ns.). DVT was seen in 92 % at inclusion, 8 % had PE. Mean age at first VTE was 52 ± 17 (27-82). Consecutive homozygous FVL patients had a higher age at first thrombosis than previously described. Homozygous females are affected at an earlier age than homozygous men and female controls. It seems that thrombi in homozygous FVL have a different pattern compared to controls i.e. more prone for thrombosis in the lower extremity. The odds ratio for thrombosis among homozygous FVL seems to be lower than previously described.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and arterial thrombosis have been thought to result from two different mechanisms. Recent data indicate that the two diseases may share some common risk factors, such as the activity of inflammation on haemostasis. In this population-based study we explored whether raised levels of inflammation-sensitive plasma markers (ISPs) increase the risk for venous thromboembolism. Measurements of five ISPs (fibrinogen, haptoglobin, ceruloplasmin, α1-antitrypsin and orosomucoid) were performed in 6,068 subjects from "the Malmö Preventive Study". These apparently healthy men from the city of Malmö in Sweden, were included in the study between 1974 and 1982 and followed up until 2008. We calculated the hazard ratio (HR) for VTE in relation to the number of raised ISPs as well as individual ISPs in the fourth quartile. Mean follow-up time was 26.2 years. Out of the cohort (n = 6,068), 398 (6.6%) had a venous thromboembolism during the follow-up. The number of raised ISPs was significantly associated with age, BMI and smoking. Age, BMI and diabetes mellitus type 2 were also significant risk factors for developing a VTE (HR = 1.05 with p < 0.01 and 95% CI 1.01-1.08, HR = 1.10 with p < 0.001 and 95% CI 1.06-1.14 and HR = 1.78 with p < 0.05 and 95% CI 1.13-2.81, respectively). Incidence of venous thromboembolism was not significantly related to number of raised inflammatory proteins (p for trend = 0.37) or any of the individual ISPs. Age and BMI is significantly associated with the risk for developing VTE. Incidence of VTE was not associated with any of the inflammatory proteins.

Background: Cancer screening is performed worldwide for several malignancies. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) precedes multiple myeloma (MM) and related lymphoproliferative disorders (LP). However, less than 5% of all MM patients are diagnosed during their precursor state and individuals who develop MM while being monitored for MGUS have better overall survival and fewer complications, compared to MM patients diagnosed without knowledge of MGUS. Thus, population-based screening for MGUS could identify candidates for early treatment of MM/LPs. To evaluate whether systematic screening is beneficial, we performed the Iceland Screens, Treats, or Prevents Multiple Myeloma (iStopMM) study, the first population-based screening study for MGUS that includes a randomized clinical trial (RCT) of follow-up and treatment strategies. Methods: All living residents of Iceland on September 9th, 2016 who were born before 1976 (N=148,708) were invited to participate. Of those, 80,759 (54.3%) provided informed consent for screening. Serum samples were collected from participants alongside clinical blood sampling in the Icelandic health service between September 2016 and the end of 2020. All samples were shipped to the Binding Site in Birmingham, UK, for screening. Samples were tested for M-proteins by capillary zone electrophoresis and immunofixation electrophoresis performed to confirm and characterize suspected M-proteins. Free light chains (FLCs) were measured using the FreeLite® assay. Individuals with a previous diagnosis of MM/LPs/MGUS (N=237) were excluded. Per protocol and informed consent, participants with MGUS were randomized to one of the three study arms: Arm 1 where participants are not contacted; Arm 2 where individuals are followed based on current guidelines; and Arm 3 where individuals are followed with a more intensive diagnostic and monitoring strategy. Participants who progress are offered early treatment. All participants repeatedly answered questionnaires on quality of life and mental health. Results: A total of 75,422 participants (93.4%) provided a serum sample for screening. Of those, 3,725 (4.9%) had MGUS. The prevalence of MGUS was dependent on age with 2.3%, 6.2%, and 12.9% diagnosed in age groups 40-59, 60-79, and 80-103 years, respectively. The prevalence of MGUS was higher in males, 5.9% vs 4.1% (p&lt;0.0001). Most individuals with MGUS had either low-risk (38%) or low-intermediate (36%) risk MGUS, followed by high-intermediate (26%) risk MGUS. High-risk MGUS was only present in 0.2% of MGUS cases (n=9). The RCT includes 3,487 newly diagnosed MGUS individuals with 1164, 1159, and 1164 individuals in arms 1, 2 and 3, respectively (Table). The median age at diagnosis was 69 years in arms 1 and 2, and 70 years in arm 3. Females constituted 45.9% and the isotypes were IgG (50%), IgA (10%), IgM (18%) and biclonal (8%). The median M-protein concentration was 0.34 g/dL. A total of 428 light-chain MGUS cases were randomized. The demographic distribution was well balanced between the three arms. After a median follow-up of 3 years, 194 patients in the RCT have been diagnosed with any LP: 9 in arm 1, 92 in arm 2, and 133 in arm 3 (p&lt;0.001). The participants in arm 1 were diagnosed with smoldering Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (SWM)(N=2), WM (N=2), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (N=1), and MM (N=4). Participants in arm 2 were diagnosed with amyloidosis (N=1), SWM (N=18), WM (N=2), CLL (N=2), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (N=1), smoldering MM (SMM) (N=56), and MM (N=12). Participants in arm 3 were diagnosed with amyloidosis (N=2), SWM (N=22), CLL (N=5), NHL (N=6), SMM (N=82), and MM (N=16). The difference between study arms was statistically significant for all LPs combined, and for SWM, SMM, and MM (Table). Conclusion: In this large prospective population-based screening study including &gt;75,000 screened persons, we have identified 3,725 individuals with monoclonal gammopathy. In the RCT, after 3 years of follow-up, we show that active screening identifies significantly higher number of individuals with full-blown malignancy and smoldering disease, illustrating the fact that early detection and intervention is achievable. Although our findings are encouraging, until final results of the iStopMM study become available, including data on survival and quality of life, we advise against systematic MGUS screening in healthy individuals. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kristinsson: Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Kampanis: The Binding Site: Current Employment. Hultcrantz: Curio Science LLC: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Intellisphere LLC: Consultancy. Durie: Amgen: Other: fees from non-CME/CE services ; Amgen, Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Takeda: Consultancy. Harding: The Binding Site: Current Employment, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Landgren: Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Janssen: Other: IDMC; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: IDMC; Amgen: Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract