Whether patients diagnosed with primary breast cancer are offered adjuvant systemic therapy following surgical removal of the tumor is based on prognosis. Prognosis is estimated in every patient using established prognostic variables. Unfortunately, when using the currently available prognostic parameters a significant proportion of patients are over-treated. Thus, in order to improve stratification of breast cancer patients, additional prognostic factors need to be identified. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) is one of the promising candidates for new prognostic markers in breast cancer, as a number of studies have demonstrated an association between high tumor-tissue levels of TIMP-1 mRNA as well as TIMP-1 protein and a poor prognosis of breast cancer patients. TIMP-1 is a member of the TIMP family, currently comprising four members (TIMP-1-4), and its main function is inhibition of the activity of various matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). The association between high levels of protease inhibitor and poor prognosis may be somewhat surprising, as proteolytic activity plays a pivotal role in cancer cell invasion and metastasis. However, the recent discovery of other biological functions of TIMP-1 such as growth-stimulating functions, as well as anti-apoptotic and pro-angiogenetic effects, may in part explain this paradox. The purpose of this review is to give an update on the current status of TIMP-1 in breast cancer, emphasizing the prognostic utility of the inhibitor. In addition, the suggested tumor-stimulatory roles of TIMP-1 will be outlined.
With the increasing demand of providing personalized medicine the need for biobanking of biological material from individual patients has increased. Such samples are essential for molecular research aimed at characterizing diseases at several levels ranging from epidemiology and diagnostic and prognostic classification to prediction of response to therapy. Clinically validated biomarkers may provide information to be used for diagnosis, screening, evaluation of risk/predisposition, assessment of prognosis, monitoring (recurrence of disease), and prediction of response to treatment and as a surrogate response marker. Many types of biological fluids or tissues can be collected and stored in biorepositories. Samples of blood can be further processed into plasma and serum, and tissue pieces can be either frozen or fixed in formalin and then embedded into paraffin. The present review focuses on biological fluids, especially serum and plasma, intended for study of protein biomarkers. In biomarker studies the process from the decision to take a sample from an individual to the moment the sample is safely placed in the biobank consists of several phases including collection of samples, transport of the samples, and handling and storage of samples. Critical points in each step important for high quality biomarker studies are described in this review. Failure to develop and adhere to robust standardized protocols may have significant consequences as the quality of the material stored in the biobank as well as conclusions and clinical recommendations based on analysis of such material may be severely affected.
Improvement of the management of breast cancer patients has high priority. In this regard, prognostic stratification needs to be improved in order to ensure proper medical treatment of all patients and furthermore predictors of response to chemotherapy are urgently needed. As new treatment opportunities emerge in the future this need will continue to grow. Thus, the search for molecular markers of prognosis and prediction is ongoing. Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) has been suggested as a marker of both prognosis and response to treatment. Several studies have demonstrated the association between TIMP-1 and prognosis in breast cancer and new studies within this area have focused on the possibility of using blood samples or paraffin embedded tissue instead of tumor tissue extracts for measurements of TIMP-1. Interestingly, recent studies have investigated the association between TIMP-1 and response to treatment showing that TIMP-1 may also carry predictive information on response to treatment. In this regard, results from studies of the molecular functions of TIMP-1 point to a role of TIMP-1 in the inhibition of tumor cell apoptosis as an explanation for the clinical findings. This review gives an update on the ongoing investigation of the potential role of TIMP-1 as a tumor marker in breast cancer. Furthermore, we link the clinical findings with studies of the molecular actions of the TIMP-1 protein, raising hypotheses that may explain why TIMP-1 could play an important role in future management of breast cancer patients.
The efficacy of single-allergen-specific immunotherapy in polysensitized subjects is a matter of debate. We therefore performed a post hoc analysis of pooled data from six randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (N = 1871) comparing the efficacy and safety of the SQ-standardized grass allergy immunotherapy tablet (AIT), Grazax (Phleum pratense 75 000 SQ-T/2800 BAU, ALK, Denmark), in mono- and polysensitized subjects. A statistically significant reduction in the mean total combined symptom/medication score (TCS) of 27% was demonstrated in actively treated subjects compared with placebo (P < 0.0001). This was not dependent on sensitization status (P = 0.5772), suggesting a similar treatment effect in mono- and polysensitized subjects (i.e. reductions of the TCSs of 28% and 26%, respectively, both P < 0.0001). Finally, a comparable and favourable safety profile of grass AIT was demonstrated in the two subgroups. Thus, no difference in efficacy and safety of single-allergen grass AIT was observed between mono- and polysensitized subjects.
The tumor level of TIMP-1 has been suggested as a new prognostic marker in breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether TIMP-1 also carries prognostic information when measured in blood as this is a much more preferable material compared with tumor extracts. Using ELISA, TIMP-1 was measured in prospectively collected preoperative plasma and serum samples from 519 patients with primary breast cancer, and the measurements were related to patient outcome. The median age of the patients was 58 years (range, 38 -80 years), and the median follow-up time was 1043 days (range, 300 -1630 days). Plasma and serum TIMP-1 measurements correlated significantly with each other with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.75 (p < 0.0001). For univariate survival analysis, patients were divided into quartiles according to increasing TIMP-1 levels (Q1-Q4). Analysis of all patients showed that high TIMP-1 plasma levels were significantly associated with a shorter disease-free survival. Subgroup analysis showed that plasma TIMP-1 significantly predicted the prognosis of node-negative patients but not of node-positive patients. Importantly plasma TIMP-1 was able to further stratify low risk node-negative patients. High serum TIMP-1 levels were associated with a shorter disease-free survival; however, the association was not statistically significant. In contrast, serum TIMP-1 significantly predicted the prognosis of node-negative and low risk patients. In multivariate survival analysis of node-negative patients including all the classical prognostic parameters, plasma TIMP-1 remained significantly associated with prognosis when comparing Q1 with Q2 and Q4. Serum TIMP-1 remained significant when comparing Q1 with Q4. Taken together, this study is to our knowledge the first large prospective study suggesting that TIMP-1 carries independent prognostic information when measured in blood, especially plasma. This was especially true in the node-
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.