The present study focuses on the main characteristics of first-generation teeth (i.e., the first teeth of the dentition to develop in a given position and to become functional) in representatives of the major lineages of nonmammalian vertebrates (chondrichthyans, actinopterygians, and sarcopterygians: dipnoans, urodeles, squamates, and crocodiles). Comparative investigations on the LM and TEM level reveal the existence of two major types of first-generation teeth. One type (generalized Type 1) is characterized by its small size, conical shape, atubular dentine, and small pulp cavity without capillaries and blood vessels. This type is found in actinopterygians, dipnoans, and urodeles and coincides with the occurrence of short embryonic periods in these species. The other type assembles a variety of first-generation teeth, which have in common that they represent miniature versions of adult teeth. They are generally larger than the first type, have more complex shapes, tubular dentine, and a large pulp cavity containing blood vessels. These teeth are found in chondrichtyans, squamates, and crocodiles, taxa which all share an extended embryonic period. The presence in certain taxa of a particular type of first-generation teeth is neither linked to their phylogenetic relationships nor to adult body size or tooth structure, but relates to the duration of embryonic development. Given that the plesiomorphic state in vertebrates is a short embryonic development, we consider the generalized Type 1 first-generation tooth to represent an ancestral character for gnathostomes. We hypothesize that an extended embryonic development leads to the suppression of tooth generations in the development of dentition. These may still be present in the form of rudimentary germs in the embryonic period. In our view, this generalized Type 1 first-generation teeth has been conserved through evolution because it represents a very economic and efficient way of building small and simple teeth adapted to larval life. The highly adapted adult dentition characteristic for each lineage has been possible only through polyphyodonty.

Amelogenin plays a crucial role in enamel structure and mineralization, but the function of its various domains is far to be understood. Evolutionary analysis seems to be a promising way to approach structure/function relationships. In this paper, we review the knowledge of amelogenin with a particular focus on what we have learnt from evolution, and we bring new data on the origin and evolution of this molecule. The comparison of amniote (reptiles and mammals) amelogenin sequences reveals that, in contrast to the well-conserved C- and N-terminal domains, the central region (most of exon 6) is highly variable. The evolutionary analysis indicates that it was created by repeated insertion of three amino acids (triplets ProXGlu or ProXX). In several mammalian lineages a new run of triplet insertions and deletions has occurred independently in a locus considered a hot spot of mutation for mammalian amelogenin. In lizard and snake amelogenin evolves rapidly. Sequence alignment reveals that several residues in the N- and C-terminal regions were kept unchanged during 250 million years (MY), proving their importance for amelogenin structure and function. This alignment permits a rapid validation of the amelogenin mutations in human. Genome sequencing and gene mapping permitted to refine the amelogenin story, in relation to the common location (chromosome 4 in human) of several genes coding for dental proteins and SPARCL1, a SPARC (osteonectin) relative. Amelogenin shares a similar organisation with these genes and a blast search in databanks indicates a strong relationship between amelogenin, ameloblastin and enamelin. Taken together these data suggest that amelogenin could have originated from either ameloblastin or enamelin, themselves being created from SPARCL1, which itself originated from a SPARC duplication, 600 millions years ago.

Background/Aims: Enamel and enameloid were identified in early jawless vertebrates, about 500 million years ago (MYA). This suggests that enamel matrix proteins (EMPs) have at least the same age. We review the current data on the origin, evolution and relationships of enamel mineralization genes. Methods and Results: Three EMPs are secreted by ameloblasts during enamel formation: amelogenin (AMEL), ameloblastin (AMBN) and enamelin (ENAM). Recently, two new genes, amelotin (AMTN) and odontogenic ameloblast associated (ODAM), were found to be expressed by ameloblasts during maturation, increasing the group of ameloblast-secreted proteins to five members. The evolutionary analysis of these five genes indicates that they are related: AMEL is derived from AMBN, AMTN and ODAM are sister genes, and all are derived from ENAM. Using molecular dating, we showed that AMBN/AMEL duplication occurred >600 MYA. The large sequence dataset available for mammals and reptiles was used to study AMEL evolution. In the N- and C-terminal regions, numerous residues were unchanged during >200 million years, suggesting that they are important for the proper function of the protein. Conclusion: The evolutionary analysis of AMEL led to propose a dataset that will be useful to validate AMEL mutations leading to X- linked AI.

Abstract. An evolutionary analysis of mammalian amelogenin, the major protein of forming enamel, was conducted by comparison of 26 sequences (including 14 new ones) representative of the main mammalian lineages. Amelogenin shows highly conserved residues in the hydrophilic N-and C-terminal regions. The central hydrophobic region (most of exon 6) is more variable, but it has conserved a high amount of proline and glutamine located in triplets, PXQ, indicating that these residues play an important role. This region evolves more rapidly, and is less constrained, than the other well-conserved regions, which are subjected to strong constraints. The comparison of the substitution rates in relation to the CpG richness confirmed that the highly conserved regions are subjected to strong selective pressures. The amino acids located at important sites and the residues known to lead to amelogenesis imperfecta when substituted were present in all sequences examined. Evolutionary analysis of the variable region of exon 6 points to a particular zone, rich in either amino acid insertion or deletion. We consider this region a hot spot of mutation for the mammalian amelogenin. In this region, numerous triplet repeats (PXQ) have been inserted recently and independently in five lineages, while most of the hydrophobic exon 6 region probably had its origin in several rounds of triplet insertions, early in vertebrate evolution. The putative ancestral DNA sequence of the mammalian amelogenin was calculated using a maximum likelihood approach. The putative ancestral protein was composed of 177 residues. It already contained all important amino acid positions known to date, its hydrophobic variable region was rich in proline and glutamine, and it contained triplet repeats PXQ as in the modern sequences.