Background and Purpose— The safety of thrombolysis for acute stroke in patients with cancer is not well established. Our aim is to study the outcomes after thrombolysis in patients with stroke with cancer. Methods— Patients with acute ischemic stroke who received thrombolysis were identified from the 2009 and 2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Patients with cancer-associated strokes and noncancer strokes were compared based on demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes. Results— Of the 32 576 strokes treated with thrombolysis, cancer-associated strokes had significantly higher comorbidity indices overall, but fewer vascular risk factors than noncancer strokes. There was no difference in the rates of home discharge and in-hospital mortality, after adjusting for confounders. Subgroup analysis showed that compared with liquid cancers, patients with solid tumors had worse home discharge (odds ratio, 0.178; 95% confidence interval, 0.109–0.290; P <0.001) and higher in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 3.018; 95% confidence interval, 1.37–6.646; P =0.006) after thrombolysis. Metastatic cancers had poorest outcomes, but intracerebral hemorrhage rates were similar. Conclusions— Thrombolytic therapy for acute stroke in patients with cancer is not associated with increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage or in-hospital mortality. However, careful consideration of the cancer subtype may help delineate the subset of patients with poor response to thrombolysis. Prospective confirmation is warranted.

Purpose: Accurate identification of tissue of origin (ToO) for patients with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) may help customize therapy to the putative primary and thereby improve the clinical outcome. We prospectively studied the performance of a microRNA-based assay to identify the ToO in CUP patients.Experimental Design: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) metastatic tissue from 104 patients was reviewed and 87 of these contained sufficient tumor for testing. The assay quantitates 48 microRNAs and assigns one of 25 tumor diagnoses by using a biologically motivated binary decision tree and a K-nearest neighbors (KNN). The assay predictions were compared with clinicopathologic features and, where suitable, to therapeutic response.Results: Seventy-four of the 87 cases were processed successfully. The assay result was consistent or compatible with the clinicopathologic features in 84% of cases processed successfully (71% of all samples attempted). In 65 patients, pathology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) suggested a diagnosis or (more often) a differential diagnosis. Out of those, the assay was consistent or compatible with the clinicopathologic presentation in 55 (85%) cases. Of the 9 patients with noncontributory IHC, the assay provided a ToO prediction that was compatible with the clinical presentation in 7 cases.Conclusions: In this prospective study, the microRNA diagnosis was compatible with the clinicopathologic picture in the majority of cases. Comparative effectiveness research trials evaluating the added benefit of molecular profiling in appropriate CUP subsets are warranted. MicroRNA profiling may be particularly helpful in patients in whom the IHC profile of the metastasis is nondiagnostic or leaves a large differential diagnosis.

The study findings highlight the continued lack of access and care disparity among the minorities, which could precipitate potentially preventable utilizations, and limit access to hospice care during end-of-life. The study suggests the need to develop educational, patient navigational and other interventions that could potentially reduce aggressive utilizations and improve appropriate hospice care provision during end-of-life.

BackgroundInadequate bowel preparation during screening colonoscopy necessitates repeating colonoscopy. Studies suggest inadequate bowel preparation rates of 20–60%. This increases the cost of colonoscopy for our society.AimThe aim of this study is to determine the impact of inadequate bowel preparation rate on the cost effectiveness of colonoscopy compared to other screening strategies for colorectal cancer (CRC).MethodsA microsimulation model of CRC screening strategies for the general population at average risk for CRC. The strategies include fecal immunochemistry test (FIT) every year, colonoscopy every ten years, sigmoidoscopy every five years, or stool DNA test every 3 years. The screening could be performed at private practice offices, outpatient hospitals, and ambulatory surgical centers.ResultsAt the current assumed inadequate bowel preparation rate of 25%, the cost of colonoscopy as a screening strategy is above society’s willingness to pay (<$50,000/QALY). Threshold analysis demonstrated that an inadequate bowel preparation rate of 13% or less is necessary before colonoscopy is considered more cost effective than FIT. At inadequate bowel preparation rates of 25%, colonoscopy is still more cost effective compared to sigmoidoscopy and stool DNA test. Sensitivity analysis of all inputs adjusted by ±10% showed incremental cost effectiveness ratio values were influenced most by the specificity, adherence, and sensitivity of FIT and colonoscopy.ConclusionsScreening colonoscopy is not a cost effective strategy when compared with fecal immunochemical test, as long as the inadequate bowel preparation rate is greater than 13%.

Our retrospective study provides encouraging indications that CUP patients with gastrointestinal profiles benefit from site-specific therapy. We recommend all CUP patients, especially those with abdominal nodes, isolated carcinomatosis or liver metastases, to undergo optimal immunohistochemistry (IHC) to check for a gastrointestinal profile of CUP.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract