The risk of P leaching from topsoil based on the change‐point estimated via a split‐line model between Olsen P and leachable P extracted by 0.01 M CaCl2 has been reported. However, little information is available for the assessment of P leaching from soil profiles. In this study, samples were collected at three depth profiles (0–20 cm, topsoil; 20–40 cm, subsoil; 40–60 cm, third‐layer soil) at each of 74 sites under agriculture and forest in an agroforestry area. A cascade extraction method was proposed to determine the leachable P in the subsoil, extracted by the topsoil extraction solution; a similar extracted process was followed in the third‐layer soil, and in the topsoil, it was still extracted by 0.01 M CaCl2. A positive linear correlation was found between the subsoil leachable P extracted by the topsoil extraction solution and the accumulated P obtained from the subsoil leached by topsoil leachates, and so on. Therefore, the cascade extraction method for determining leachable P from topsoils and underlying soils could be valuable for predicting the potential of P leaching from soil profiles. Approximately 81, 73, and 73% of the agricultural sampling sites were at or above the change‐points for the soil depths of 0 to 20, 20 to 40, and 40 to 60 cm (30.4, 32.9, and 18.2 mg kg−1 respectively); these values were higher than those for the forest site, implying a high risk of P leaching from agricultural soil profiles in the study area.
Core Ideas
A cascade extraction method for evaluating P leaching from soil profiles was proposed.
The correlation of soil leachable P and accumulated P in soil leachates was confirmed.
The risk of P leaching from soil profiles in an agroforestry area was calculated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.