Mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC)-derived exosomes play a promising role in regenerative medicine. Their trophic and immunomodulatory potential has made them a promising candidate for cardiac regeneration and repair. Numerous studies have demonstrated that MSC-derived exosomes can replicate the antiinflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and pro-angiogenic and antifibrotic effects of their parent cells and are considered a substitute for cell-based therapies. In addition, their lower tumorigenic risk, superior immune tolerance, and superior stability compared with their parent stem cells make them an attractive option in regenerative medicine. The therapeutic effects of MSC-derived exosomes have consequently been evaluated for application in cardiac regeneration and repair. In this review, we summarize the potential mechanisms and therapeutic effects of MSC-derived exosomes in cardiac regeneration and repair and provide evidence to support their clinical application.

Background Optimal cell type as cell-based therapies for heart failure (HF) remains unclear. We sought to compare the safety and efficacy of direct intramyocardial transplantation of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hESC-CMs) and human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hiPSC-MSCs) in a porcine model of HF. Methods Eight weeks after induction of HF with myocardial infarction (MI) and rapid pacing, animals with impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were randomly assigned to receive direct intramyocardial injection of saline (MI group), 2 × 10 8 hESC-CMs (hESC-CM group), or 2 × 10 8 hiPSC-MSCs (hiPSC-MSC group). The hearts were harvested for immunohistochemical evaluation after serial echocardiography and hemodynamic evaluation and ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) induction by in vivo programmed electrical stimulation. Results At 8 weeks post-transplantation, LVEF, left ventricular maximal positive pressure derivative, and end systolic pressure-volume relationship were significantly higher in the hiPSC-MSC group but not in the hESC-CM group compared with the MI group. The incidence of early spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) episodes was higher in the hESC-CM group but the incidence of inducible VT was similar among the different groups. Histological examination showed no tumor formation but hiPSC-MSCs exhibited a stronger survival capacity by activating regulatory T cells and reducing the inflammatory cells. In vitro study showed that hiPSC-MSCs were insensitive to pro-inflammatory interferon-gamma-induced human leukocyte antigen class II expression compared with hESC-CMs. Moreover, hiPSC-MSCs also significantly enhanced angiogenesis compared with other groups via increasing expression of distinct angiogenic factors. Conclusions Our results demonstrate that transplantation of hiPSC-MSCs is safe and does not increase proarrhythmia or tumor formation and superior to hESC-CMs for the improvement of cardiac function in HF. This is due to their immunomodulation that improves in vivo survival and enhanced angiogenesis via paracrine effects. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13287-019-1183-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.