OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to assess the reliability of interpretation of ultrasound findings according to data blinding in maturing hemophilic joints and to determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound compared with MRI for assessing joint components. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Ankles (n = 34) or knees (n = 25) of boys with hemophilia or von Willebrand disease (median age, 13 years; range, 5-17 years) were imaged by ultrasound, MRI, and radiography in two centers (Toronto, Canada, and Vellore, India). Ultrasound scans were performed by two operators (one blinded and one unblinded to MRI data) and were reviewed by four reviewers who were unblinded to corresponding MRI findings according to a proposed 0- to 14-item scale that matches 14 of 17 items of the corresponding MRI scale. MRI examinations were independently reviewed by two readers. RESULTS. When data were acquired by radiologists, ultrasound was highly reliable for assessing soft-tissue changes (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.98 for ankles and 0.97 for knees) and substantially to highly reliable for assessing osteochondral changes (ICC, 0.61 for ankles and 0.89 for knees). Ultrasound was highly sensitive (> 92%) for assessing synovial hypertrophy and hemosiderin in both ankles and knees but had borderline sensitivity for detecting small amounts of fluid in ankles (70%) in contrast to knees (93%) and variable sensitivity for evaluating osteochondral abnormalities (sensitivity range, 86-100% for ankles and 12-100% for knees). CONCLUSION. If it is performed by experienced radiologists using a standardized protocol, ultrasound is highly reliable for assessing soft-tissue abnormalities of ankles and knees and substantially to highly reliable for assessing osteochondral changes in these joints.
Evaluation of prophylactic treatment of haemophilia requires sensitive methods. To design and test a new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scale for haemophilic arthropathy, two scales of a combined MRI scoring scheme were merged into a single scale which includes soft tissue and osteochondral subscores. Sixty-one joint MRI's of 46 patients with haemophilia were evaluated by four radiologists using the new and older scales. Forty-six of the joints were evaluated using two X-ray scales. For all MRI scores, interreader agreement and correlations with X-ray scores and lifetime number of haemarthroses were analysed. The interreader agreement intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.82, 0.89 and 0.88 for the soft tissue and osteochondral subscores and the total score, as evaluated according to the new MRI scale, compared to 0.80 and 0.89 as for the older scales. The total score and osteochondral subscore according to the new scale, as well as scores according to the older scales were correlated (P < 0.01) with number of haemarthroses (Spearman correlation 0.35-0.68) and with the X-ray scores (Spearman correlation 0.40-0.76), but no correlation (P > 0.05) was found between the soft tissue subscore of the new MRI scale and the X-ray scores. The new MRI scale is simpler to apply than the older and has similar reader reliability and correlation with lifetime number of haemarthroses, and by separating soft tissue and osteochondral changes it gives additional information. The new scale is useful for analyses of early and moderate stages of arthropathy, and may help to evaluate prophylactic haemophilia treatment.
Joint morbidity in haemophilia has traditionally been measured using clinical and radiological scores. There have been no reliable, validated tools for the assessment of functional independence in persons with haemophilia till recently. The Functional Independence Score in Haemophilia (FISH) has been developed as a performance based assessment tool to address this need. The FISH is designed to measure the patient's independence in performing activities of daily living (grooming and eating, bathing and dressing), transfers (chair and floor), and mobility (walking, step climbing and running). On assessment of its psychometric properties in 63 patients with haemophilia (mean age 14 years), FISH was found to have good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.85). It had moderate correlation with the World Federation of Hemophilia clinical score (r = -0.61), and a correlation with the Pettersson score of -0.38. It had good correlation with other self-rated functional scores, such as the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (r = -0.75); the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (r = -0.66) and the Haemophilia Activities List (HAL) (r = -0.66). It had good reliability with a pooled intra class correlation of 0.98. On assessing responsiveness following treatment of flexion deformities of the knee in 12 patients, the FISH showed significant changes in the score with a standardized responsiveness mean of -1.93. In conclusion, the FISH was found to be a reliable and valid tool with good internal consistency and responsiveness to therapy, for the assessment of functional independence in persons with haemophilia.
US and MRI are able to identify pathological changes in joints with normal X-ray imaging and clinical examination. However, further studies are required to be able to differentiate early abnormalities from normal. Clinical (HJHS) and radiological assessment (US/MRI) provide complimentary information and should be considered conjointly in the assessment of early joint arthropathy.
Aim: The objective of this survey was to understand the global trends of imaging assessments in persons with haemophilia, focusing on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). Insights into the barriers impeding its widespread proliferation as a frontline imaging modality were obtained. Methods: The survey opened in September of 2017 and closed in May of 2018. Haemophilia Treatment Centres (HTCs) treating both paediatric/adult patients were the population of interest. A REDCap survey of 25 questions was disseminated to 232 clinical staff in 26 countries. Results: The majority of respondents (88.3%, 91/103) reported that POCUS is most useful to confirm or rule out a presumed acute joint bleed. European HTCs reported the highest routine use of POCUS at 59.5% (22/37) followed by HTCs in the "Other" countries of the world at 46.7% (7/15) and North American HTCs at 43.9% (25/57). At the time of the survey, physiotherapists were identified as the clinical staff who perform POCUS 52.8% (28/53) of the time, in contrast with nurses/nurse practitioners who represent only 5.7% (3/53) of users. The greatest perceived barriers to the implementation of POCUS are the lack of trained healthcare professionals who
The study was undertaken to document cartilage and soft tissue changes/findings in ankles and knees of normal children of different age groups to be used for comparison in the assessment of children with haemophilia. Cartilage thickness and soft tissue changes were recorded at predetermined sites of ankles/knees on both US and MRI in healthy boys in three age groups: 7-9; 10-14; and 15-18 years. To assess the validity of the ultrasound and MRI measurements, an ex vivo study was done using agar phantoms with techniques and scanners similar to those applied in vivo. Twenty (48%) knees and 22 (52%) ankles of 42 boys, were evaluated. There was a reduction in the thickness of joint cartilage with age. A difference in cartilage measurements was noted in most sites between the age groups on both US and MRI (P < 0.05 each), but such difference was not noted for joint fluid in ankles or knees (P = 0.20, P = 0.68 or P = 0.75, P = 0.63 for US, MRI, respectively). Although cartilage measurements were smaller on US than on MRI for both ankles and knees (P < 0.05 each), this observation was not recorded for fluid in knees (P = 0.02). For diminutive measurements (2 mm) mean US measurements were smaller than corresponding phantom's measurements, P = 0.02. Age-related measurements were noted for cartilage thickness on US and MRI in ankles and knees. US measurements were smaller than corresponding MRI measurements at most joint sites, which were supported by results on small-diameter phantoms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.