In humans and other animals, harsh conditions in early life can have profound effects on adult physiology, including the stress response. This relationship may be mediated by a lack of supportive relationships in adulthood. That is, early life adversity may inhibit the formation of supportive social ties, and weak social support is itself often linked to dysregulated stress responses. Here, we use prospective, longitudinal data from wild baboons in Kenya to test the links between early adversity, adult social bonds, and adult fecal glucocorticoid hormone concentrations (a measure of hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal [HPA] axis activation and the stress response). Using a causal inference framework, we found that experiencing one or more sources of early adversity led to a 9 to 14% increase in females’ glucocorticoid concentrations across adulthood. However, these effects were not mediated by weak social bonds: The direct effects of early adversity on adult glucocorticoid concentrations were 11 times stronger than the effects mediated by social bonds. This pattern occurred, in part, because the effect of social bonds on glucocorticoids was weak compared to the powerful effects of early adversity on glucocorticoid levels in adulthood. Hence, in female baboons, weak social bonds in adulthood are not enough to explain the effects of early adversity on glucocorticoid concentrations. Together, our results support the well-established notions that early adversity and weak social bonds both predict poor adult health. However, the magnitudes of these two effects differ considerably, and they may act independently of one another.
Chance imbalance in baseline characteristics is common in randomized clinical trials. Regression adjustment such as the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is often used to account for imbalance and increase precision of the treatment effect estimate. An objective alternative is through inverse probability weighting (IPW) of the propensity scores. Although IPW and ANCOVA are asymptotically equivalent, the former may demonstrate inferior performance in finite samples. In this article, we point out that IPW is a special case of the general class of balancing weights, and advocate to use overlap weighting (OW) for covariate adjustment. The OW method has a unique advantage of completely removing chance imbalance when the propensity score is estimated by logistic regression. We show that the OW estimator attains the same semiparametric variance lower bound as the most efficient ANCOVA estimator and the IPW estimator for a continuous outcome, and derive closed‐form variance estimators for OW when estimating additive and ratio estimands. Through extensive simulations, we demonstrate OW consistently outperforms IPW in finite samples and improves the efficiency over ANCOVA and augmented IPW when the degree of treatment effect heterogeneity is moderate or when the outcome model is incorrectly specified. We apply the proposed OW estimator to the Best Apnea Interventions for Research (BestAIR) randomized trial to evaluate the effect of continuous positive airway pressure on patient health outcomes. All the discussed propensity score weighting methods are implemented in the R package PSweight.
We investigate the estimation of subgroup treatment effects with observational data. Existing propensity score matching and weighting methods are mostly developed for estimating overall treatment effect. Although the true propensity score should balance covariates for the subgroup populations, the estimated propensity score may not balance covariates for the subgroup samples. We propose the subgroup balancing propensity score (SBPS) method, which selects, for each subgroup, to use either the overall sample or the subgroup sample to estimate propensity scores for units within that subgroup, in order to optimize a criterion accounting for a set of covariate-balancing conditions for both the overall sample and the † Jing Dong subgroup samples. We develop a stochastic search algorithm for the estimation of SBPS when the number of subgroups is large. We demonstrate through simulations that the SBPS can improve the performance of propensity score matching in estimating subgroup treatment effects. We then apply the SBPS method to data from the Italy Survey of Household Income and Wealth (SHIW) to estimate the treatment effects of having debit card on household consumption for different income groups.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.