Daily supplementation with the essential trace mineral selenium significantly reduced prostate cancer risk in men in the Nutritional Prevention of Cancer Trial. However, the optimal intake of selenium for prostate cancer prevention is unknown. We hypothesized that selenium significantly regulates the extent of genotoxic damage within the aging prostate and that the relationship between dietary selenium intake and DNA damage is non-linear, i.e. more selenium is not necessarily better. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a randomized feeding trial in which 49 elderly beagle dogs (physiologically equivalent to 62-69-year-old men) received nutritionally adequate or supranutritional levels of selenium for 7 months, in order to mimic the range of dietary selenium intake of men in the United States. Our results demonstrate an intriguing U-shaped dose-response relationship between selenium status (toenail selenium concentration) and the extent of DNA damage (alkaline Comet assay) within the prostate. Further, we demonstrate that the concentration of selenium that minimizes DNA damage in the aging dog prostate remarkably parallels the selenium concentration in men that minimizes prostate cancer risk. By studying elderly dogs, the only non-human animal model of spontaneous prostate cancer, we have established a new approach to bridge the gap between laboratory and human studies that can be used to select the appropriate dose of anticancer agents for large-scale human cancer prevention trials. From the U-shaped dose-response, it follows that not all men will necessarily benefit from increasing their selenium intake and that measurement of baseline nutrient status should be required for all individuals in prevention trials to avoid oversupplementation.
The trace mineral selenium inhibits cancer development in a variety of experimental animal models. We used an in vivo canine model to evaluate the effects of dietary selenium supplementation on DNA damage in prostate tissue and on apoptosis in prostate epithelial cells. Sexually intact elderly male beagle dogs were randomly assigned to receive an unsupplemented diet (control group) or diets that were supplemented with selenium (treatment group), either as selenomethionine or as high-selenium yeast at 3 micro g/kg or 6 micro g/kg body weight per day for 7 months. The extent of DNA damage in prostate cells and in peripheral blood lymphocytes, as determined by the alkaline comet assay, was lower among the selenium-supplemented dogs than among the control dogs (prostate P<.001; peripheral blood lymphocytes P =.003; analysis of variance) but was not associated with the activity of the antioxidant enzyme glutathione peroxidase in plasma. The median number of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling-positive (i.e., apoptotic) prostate epithelial cells was 3.7 (interquartile range = 1.1-7.6) for the selenium-supplemented dogs and 1.7 (interquartile range = 0.2-2.8) for the control dogs ( P =.04, Mann-Whitney U test). These data suggest that dietary selenium supplementation decreases DNA damage and increases epithelial cell apoptosis within the aging canine prostate.
ᮀ Our work in dogs has revealed a U-shaped dose response between selenium status and prostatic DNA damage that remarkably parallels the relationship between dietary selenium and prostate cancer risk in men, suggesting that more selenium is not necessarily better. Herein, we extend this canine work to show that the selenium dose that minimizes prostatic DNA damage also maximizes apoptosis-a cancer-suppressing death switch used by prostatic epithelial cells. These provocative findings suggest a new line of thinking about how selenium can reduce cancer risk. Mid-range selenium status (.67-.92 ppm in toenails) favors a process we call "homeostatic housecleaning"-an upregulated apoptosis that preferentially purges damaged prostatic cells. Also, the U-shaped relationship provides valuable insight into stratifying individuals as selenium-responsive or seleniumrefractory, based upon the likelihood of reducing their cancer risk by additional selenium. By studying elderly dogs, the only non-human animal model of spontaneous prostate cancer, we have established a robust experimental approach bridging the gap between laboratory and human studies that can help to define the optimal doses of cancer preventives for large-scale human trials. Moreover, our observations bring much needed clarity to the null results of the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) and set a new research priority: testing whether men with low, suboptimal selenium levels less than 0.8 ppm in toenails can achieve cancer risk reduction through daily supplementation.
Purpose: Met, an oncogene product and receptor tyrosine kinase, is a keystone molecule for malignant progression in solid human tumors. We are developing Met-directed imaging and therapeutic agents, including anti-Met monoclonal antibodies (MetSeek TM ). In this study, we compared two antibodies, Met5 and Met3, for nuclear imaging of human and canine Metexpressing tumor xenografts in nude mice. Experimental Design: Xenografts representing cancers of three different human tissue origins and metastatic canine prostate cancer were raised s.c. in host athymic nude mice. Animals were injected i.v. with I-125-Met5 or I-125-Met3, posterior total body gamma camera images were acquired for several days postinjection, and quantitative region-of-interest activity analysis was done. Results: PC-3, SK-LMS-1/HGF, and CNE-2 xenografts imaged with I-125-Met5 were compared with PC-3, SK-LMS-1/HGF, and DU145 xenografts imaged with I-125-Met3. Nuclear imaging contrast was qualitatively similar for I-125-Met5 and I-125-Met3 in PC-3 and SK-LMS-1/HGF host mice. However, by region-of-interest analysis, the set of human tumors imaged with I-125-Met3 exhibited a pattern of rapid initial tumor uptake followed by a continuous decline in activity, whereas the set of human tumors imaged with I-125-Met5 showed slow initial uptake, peak tumorassociated activity at 1 day postinjection, and persistence of activity in xenografts for at least 5 days. GN4 canine prostate cancer xenografts were readily imaged with I-125-Met5. Conclusions: We conclude that radioiodinated Met3 and Met5 offer qualitatively similar nuclear images in xenograft-bearing mice, but quantitative considerations indicate that Met5 might be more useful for radioimmunotherapy. Moreover, canine prostate cancer seems to be a suitable model for second-stage preclinical evaluation of Met5.Met, a receptor tyrosine kinase and oncogene product, is a keystone molecule for the initiation and malignant progression of solid neoplasms in humans and in experimental animal models of cancer (1). The myriad sequelae of Met activation, either following interaction with its native ligand hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF), with surrogate ligands (2, 3), or through ligand-independent pathways, include cell proliferation, migration, differentiation, and survival. In normal cells, these events are responsible for such phenomena as the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transformation responsible for limb muscle and diaphragm formation, and the formation of ductular glands. In neoplastic cells, these events are recapitulated as tumor formation, invasion, metastasis, and the prevention of apoptosis. Indeed, the plasticity involved in the initial seeding and subsequent growth of tumor metastases-which requires switching cells from an invasive to a proliferative state-can be accounted for in some experimental systems by ligand-dependent activation of Met (4).Virtually any type of solid tumor can express Met and/or its ligand abnormally (by overabundance, mutation, or dysregulation; see...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.