Background: The aim of this study was to develop a conventional ultrasound (US) features-based nomogram for the prediction of malignant nonmasslike (NML) breast lesions.Methods: Consecutive cases of adult females diagnosed with NML breast lesions via US screening in our center from June 1 st , 2017, to April 17 th , 2020, were retrospectively enrolled. Candidate variables included age, clinical symptoms, and the image features obtained from the conventional US. Nomograms were developed based on the results of the multiple logistic regression analysis via R language. One thousand bootstraps were used for internal validation. The area under the curve (AUC) and the bias-corrected concordance index (C-index) were calculated. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was also performed for further comparison between the nomogram and the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). The study has not yet been registered.Results: A total of 229 patients were included in the study after exclusion and follow-up. The overall malignant rate of NML breast lesions was 31.0%. Age, clinical symptoms, echo pattern, calcification, orientation, and Adler's classification were selected to generate the nomogram according to the results of the multivariable logistic regression analysis. The bias-corrected C-index and the AUC of our nomogram were 0.790 and 0.828, respectively. The DCA showed that our model had larger net benefits in a range from 0.2 to 0.7 when compared with the BI-RADS. Conclusions:We developed a prediction model using a combination of age, clinical symptoms, echo pattern, calcification, orientation, and Adler's classification for malignant NML breast lesion prediction that yielded adequate discrimination and calibration.
ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate a convolution neural network algorithm for breast lesion detection with multi-center ABUS image data developed based on ABUS image and Yolo v5.MethodsA total of 741 cases with 2,538 volume data of ABUS examinations were analyzed, which were recruited from 7 hospitals between October 2016 and December 2020. A total of 452 volume data of 413 cases were used as internal validation data, and 2,086 volume data from 328 cases were used as external validation data. There were 1,178 breast lesions in 413 patients (161 malignant and 1,017 benign) and 1,936 lesions in 328 patients (57 malignant and 1,879 benign). The efficiency and accuracy of the algorithm were analyzed in detecting lesions with different allowable false positive values and lesion sizes, and the differences were compared and analyzed, which included the various indicators in internal validation and external validation data.ResultsThe study found that the algorithm had high sensitivity for all categories of lesions, even when using internal or external validation data. The overall detection rate of the algorithm was as high as 78.1 and 71.2% in the internal and external validation sets, respectively. The algorithm could detect more lesions with increasing nodule size (87.4% in ≥10 mm lesions but less than 50% in <10 mm). The detection rate of BI-RADS 4/5 lesions was higher than that of BI-RADS 3 or 2 (96.5% vs 79.7% vs 74.7% internal, 95.8% vs 74.7% vs 88.4% external). Furthermore, the detection performance was better for malignant nodules than benign (98.1% vs 74.9% internal, 98.2% vs 70.4% external).ConclusionsThis algorithm showed good detection efficiency in the internal and external validation sets, especially for category 4/5 lesions and malignant lesions. However, there are still some deficiencies in detecting category 2 and 3 lesions and lesions smaller than 10 mm.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.