Background Although tourniquets are commonly used during TKA, that practice has long been surrounded by controversy. Quantifying the case for or against tourniquet use in TKA, in terms of patient-reported outcomes such as postoperative pain, is a priority. Questions/purposes The purpose of this study was to meta-analyze the available randomized trials on tourniquet use during TKA to determine whether use of a tourniquet during TKA (either for the entire procedure or some portion of it) is associated with (1) increased postoperative pain; (2) decreased ROM; and (3) longer lengths of hospital stay (LOS) compared with TKAs performed without a tourniquet. Methods We completed a systematic review and metaanalysis using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines to assess the impact of tourniquet use on patients after TKA. We searched the following databases from inception to February 1, 2015, for randomized controlled trials meeting prespecified inclusion criteria: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Postoperative pain was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were postoperative ROM and LOS. The initial search yielded 218 studies, of which 14 met the inclusion criteria. For our primary analysis on pain and ROM, a total of eight studies (221 patients in the tourniquet group, 219 patients in the no-tourniquet group) were meta-analyzed. We also performed a subgroup meta-analysis on two studies that used the tourniquet only for a portion of the procedure (from osteotomy until the leg was wrapped with bandages) and defined this as half-course tourniquet use (n = 62 in this analysis). The Jadad scale was used to ascertain methodological quality, which ranged from 3 to 5 with a maximum possible score of 5. Statistical heterogeneity was tested with I 2 and chi-square tests. A fixed-effects (inverse variance) model was used when the effects were homogenous, which was only the case for postoperative pain; the other endpoints had moderate or high levels of heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot, and postoperative pain showed no evidence of publication bias, but the endpoint of LOS may have suffered from publication bias or poor methodological quality. We defined the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain as 20 mm on the 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). Each author certifies that neither he or she, nor any member of his or her immediate family, has funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® neither advocates nor endorses the use of any treatment, drug, or device. Readers are encouraged to always seek additional information, including FDAapproval status, of any drug or device prior to clinical use.

No abstract

High-energy traumatic long bone defects are some of the most challenging to reconstruct. Although cases of spontaneous bone regeneration in these defects have been reported, we are aware of no management guidelines or recommendations for when spontaneous bone regeneration should be considered a viable management option. We aim to identify how certain patient characteristics and surgical factors may help predict spontaneous bone regeneration. A total of 26 cases with traumatic segmental defects were treated at our institution, with eight cases (30.8%) undergoing spontaneous regeneration. We discuss four in detail. Six (75%) reported a degree of periosteal preservation, four (50%) were associated with traumatic brain injury and none were complicated by infection. The average time to spontaneous bone regeneration was 2.06 months. According to our cases, patients with favourable characteristics may benefit from delaying surgical treatment by 6 weeks to monitor for any signs of spontaneous bone formation.

No abstract

Tickborne diseases (TBDs) such as Lyme disease (LD), babesiosis, ehrlichiosis and Rocky Mountain spotted fever cause substantial morbidity and even mortality in the USA. Data indicate that Hispanic populations may be at greater risk for occupational exposure to ticks and disseminated LD; however, information on knowledge and practices of Hispanic populations regarding TBDs is limited. We surveyed 153 Hispanic and 153 non‐Hispanic residents of Maryland and Virginia to assess awareness of TBDs, prevention practices and risk of tick encounters. Hispanic respondents were less likely than non‐Hispanics to report familiarity with LD symptoms (21% vs. 53%, p < 0.001) and correctly identify ticks as vectors of LD (40% vs. 85%, p < 0.001). Although there was no significant difference in overall proportion of respondents who routinely take one or more preventive measures to prevent tick bites (59% vs. 61%, p = 0.65), Hispanics were more likely to report showering after coming indoors (36% vs. 25%, p = 0.04) but less likely to conduct daily tick checks compared with non‐Hispanics (17% vs. 35%, p < 0.001). History of tick bite or finding a tick crawling on oneself or a household member in the past year did not significantly differ between Hispanics and non‐Hispanics (19% vs. 24%, p = 0.26). Notably, after controlling for Hispanic/non‐Hispanic ethnicity, primary language (English vs. Spanish) was a significant predictor of whether an individual had knowledge of LD symptoms, correctly identified ticks as vectors for LD and performed daily tick checks. These results provide guidance for future development of more targeted and effective TBD prevention education for both Hispanic and non‐Hispanic communities.