A novel method was developed for the simultaneous determination of guaifenesin (GUA) and ketorolac tromethamine (KET) enantiomers in plasma samples. Since GUA probably increases the absorption of coadministered drugs (e.g., KET), it would be extremely important to monitor KET plasma levels for the purpose of dose adjustment with a subsequent decrease in the side effects. Enantiomeric resolution was achieved on a polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phase, amylose-2, as a chiral selector under the normal phase (NP) mode and using ornidazole (ORN) as internal standard. This innovative method has the advantage of the ease and reliability of sample preparation for plasma samples. Sample clean-up was based on simply using methanol for protein precipitation followed by direct extraction of drug residues using ethanol. Both GUA and KET enantiomers were separated using an isocratic mobile phase composed of hexane/isopropanol/trifluoroacetic acid, 85:15:0.05 v/v/v. Peak area ratios were linear over the range 0.05-20 µg/mL for the four enantiomers S (+) GUA, R (-) GUA, R (+) KET, and S (-) KET. The method was fully validated according to the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines in terms of system suitability, specificity, accuracy, precision, robustness, and solution stability. Finally, this procedure was innovative to apply the rationale of developing a chiral high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) procedure for the simultaneous quantitative analysis of drug isomers in clinical samples.

Rapid, simple and sensitive derivative emission spectrofluorimetric methods have been developed for the simultaneous analysis of binary mixtures of guaifenesin (GUA) and phenylephrine hydrochloride (PHE). The methods are based upon measurement of the native fluorescence intensity of the two drugs at λex = 275 nm in methanolic solutions, followed by differentiation using first (D1) and second (D2) derivative techniques. The derivative fluorescence intensity-concentration plots were rectilinear over a range of 0.1-2 µg/mL for both GUA and PHE. The limits of detection were 0.027 (D1, GUA), 0.025 (D2, GUA), 0.031 (D1, PHE) and 0.033 (D2, PHE) µg/mL and limits of quantitation were 0.089 (D1, GUA), 0.083 (D2, GUA), 0.095 (D1, PHE) and 0.097 (D2, PHE) µg/mL. The proposed derivative emission spectrofluorimetric methods (D1 and D2) were successfully applied for the determination of the two compounds in binary mixtures and tablets with high precision and accuracy. The proposed methods were fully validated as per ICH guidelines.

Hepatitis c virus (HcV) is the main cause of chronic hepatitis and probably liver cirrhosis. Dasabuvir(DSV) is a direct-acting antiviral agent with efficiency in managing HCV. The anti-viral activity of the anti-estrogen drug tamoxifen (TAM) suggested the synergistic effect of DSV and TAM for blocking the replication of HCV. However, being substrates and inhibitors of efflux transporters (TAM inhibits P-gp, DSV inhibits p-gp and BcRp), there is a possibility for a pharmacokinetic (pK) drug-drug interaction. in this work, a new UpLc-MS/MS method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of TAM, its active metabolite 4-hydroxy tamoxifen (TOH), and DSV in rat plasma. The method was applied to investigate the pK interaction between DSV and tAM/toH following the coadministration of DSV and TAM to Wistar rats. Chromatographic analysis was performed on Waters BeH tM C18 column using a mobile phase of acetonitrile/water containing 0.1% formic acid (80: 20, v/v). The method allowed the determination of concentration ranges 20-1000, 0.1-500, 0.5-500 ng/mL for DSV, tAM, and toH, respectively. Unexpectedly, results revealed the absence of pK interactions between DSV and tAM/toH, compared with their single administration, suggesting the safety of coadministering DSV/tAM as an anti-viral combination without the need of dosage adjustment.www.nature.com/scientificreports www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Matrix effect. For matrix effect, calculations were based on comparing the peak responses from the four QC samples, used for evaluating the "extraction recovery", spiked post-extraction with those of standard acetonitrile drug solutions prepared of the same nominal concentrations. Scientific RepoRtS |(2020) 10:3521 | https://doi.