A recent opinion survey of British Obstetricians revealed 'early' fetal heart rate (FHR) decelerations as the commonest type in their practice. This contrasts with the guidelines by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, UK (NICE 2007) that 'true uniform early decelerations are rare and most decelerations are variable'. This analytical review suggests that the emphasis on putative aetiology and 'waveform' of decelerations by NICE and other national guidelines leads to fundamental inconsistencies. 'Uniform shape' is misinterpretation of the description by Hon and Quilligan (1968). Truly 'uniform' (identical)) decelerations do not occur and no examples can be found. Gradual ('bell') or rapid shape has no correlation to putative causation or fetal condition. Obstetricians and midwives should seek clarification of these fallacies. The previous British practice of classifying decelerations based solely on time relationship to contractions seems most scientifically robust leading to more consistent interpretation and better discrimination of fetal status.
Sir, I thank Dr Amin for her positive comments on my review of the role of current guidelines on intrapartum fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring, and the proposed algorithm based on fetal cardiovascular adaptation to intrapartum asphyxia.1 The reliance of the guidelines on the morphological appearances, and the reference values for FHR features rather than on the relationships, temporal sequence, and the natural connection between FHR decelerations, tacchycardia or bradycardia, and loss of variability leaves the bedside clinician without an understanding of how the fetus defends itself from intrapartum hypoxia and the FHR patterns that suggest failure of that defense. This approach weakens the clinical utility of current guidelines and contributes to increased operative delivery of non-acidotic babies. In too many training modules, terms implying the presumed origins of the FHR decelerations are emphasised, overused, and presumed to be innocuous. As a result clinicians expend valuable time and energy trying to characterise and distinguish between the different types of FHR decelerations and the subtypes of 'complicated' variable decelerations from each other 2 even though most of them have been shown to have no association with fetal acidosis.3 The important point is how the fetus is handling the decelerations.Obstetric units like yours that have grasped the physiological principles of FHR monitoring and are prepared to invest in staff training and education will continue to enjoy lower rates of unwarranted operative delivery for presumed fetal compromise, escalating costs to their service and the resultant short-and long-term maternal morbidity.
Disclosure of interestsNone. n References 1 Ugwumadu A. Are we (mis)guided by current guidelines on intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring? Case for a more physiological approach to interpretation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.