BackgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become widely accepted as a standard treatment for gastric epithelial neoplasms. Antithrombotic agents are widely used to prevent thromboembolic disease. However, the feasibility of endoscopic procedures for patients using such agents has been rarely investigated. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for post-operative bleeding after gastric ESD and to evaluate the relationship between the use of antithrombotic agents and post-operative bleeding.MethodsFrom June 2005 to March 2014, 413 patients with 425 gastric neoplasms were treated by ESD. The demographic and clinical parameters associated with post-operative bleeding were investigated. 83 patients receiving antithrombotic agents were separately assessed using various methods of administration during the ESD procedure. Post-operative bleeding that occurred within 5 days of ESD was defined as early post-operative bleeding, whereas subsequent bleeding was defined as delayed bleeding.ResultsThe overall post-operative bleeding rate was 4.7%. In patients with continued low-dose aspirin (LDA), heparin replacement (HR), or continued LDA along with HR, post-operative bleeding rates were 9.5%, 23.8%, and 25.0%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, a specimen size of ≥40 mm was a risk factor for early post-operative bleeding [odds ratio (OR) 6.08, 95% CI: 1.74–21.27], and HR and chronic kidney disease (CKD) requiring hemodialysis were risk factors for delayed bleeding (OR 12.23, 95% CI: 2.63–56.77 and OR 28.35, 95% CI: 4.67–172.11, respectively). Continued LDA was not a risk factor for post-operative bleeding.ConclusionsLarge specimen size is a risk factor for early post-operative bleeding, and HR and CKD requiring hemodialysis are risk factors for delayed bleeding. Patients with risk factors should be carefully watched, allowing for the timing of post-operative bleeding after ESD.

Heparin-bridging therapy is associated with a high risk of PPB regardless of polyp size.

In patients of advanced age, more extensive follow up is needed, even if the CE result is negative. In addition, DBE subsequent to negative CE may be useful to detect lesions that were overlooked on CE.

Objectives:The pathophysiology of functional dyspepsia (FD) is not fully understood. Impaired duodenal mucosal integrity characterized by increased mucosal permeability and/or low-grade inflammation was reported as potentially important etiologies. We aimed to determine the utility of a recently developed simple catheterization method to measure mucosal admittance (MA), the inverse of mucosal impedance, for evaluation of duodenal mucosal permeability in patients with FD.Methods:We conducted two prospective studies. In the first study, duodenal MA of 23 subjects was determined by catheterization during upper endoscopy, and transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) of duodenal biopsy samples in Ussing chambers was measured to assess the correlation between MA and TEER. In the second study, duodenal MA of 21 patients with FD fulfilling the Rome III criteria was compared with that of 23 healthy subjects.Results:The mean MA and TEER values were 367.5±134.7 and 24.5±3.7 Ω cm2, respectively. There was a significant negative correlation between MA and TEER (r=−0.67, P=0.0004, Pearson's correlation coefficient). The mean MA in patients with FD was significantly higher than that in healthy subjects (455.7±137.3 vs. 352.1±66.9, P=0.002, unpaired t-test). No procedure-related complications were present.Conclusions:We demonstrated the presence of increased duodenal mucosal permeability in patients with FD by MA measurement using a simple catheterization method during upper endoscopy.

WE is superior to AI for attenuating insertion pain during colonoscopy without sedation, but its efficacy is limited in more painful endoscopy.