Background Performing repeated blood cultures after initial positive culture (i.e., follow-up blood cultures [FUBCs]) in patients with gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bacteremia is controversial. We aimed to comprehensively review the association of FUBCs with improvement in patient-relevant clinical outcomes in GNB bacteremia. Methods We performed systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis to calculate summary effect estimates. We used hazard ratios as the effect measure. The primary outcome was 30-day or in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes were lengths of treatment and hospital stay. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central) without language restrictions from inception to April 29, 2022. Original clinical studies evaluating the association between FUBCs and mortality in adult patients with GNB bacteremia were included. FUBC details were reviewed. Two independent reviewers used the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tool. Results We identified nine eligible retrospective studies. In total, 7,778 hospitalized patients with GNB bacteremia were included. The studies were clinically heterogeneous and had a critical risk of bias. The utilization of FUBCs varied across studies (18%–89%). Random-effects meta-analysis of covariate-adjusted estimates found that FUBC use was associated with reduced mortality. Although not a result of the meta-analysis, lengths of treatment and hospital stay were longer for patients with FUBCs than for those without. Adverse events were not reported. Conclusions FUBC acquisitions was associated with lower mortality and longer hospital stay and treatment duration in GNB bacteremia. The risk of bias was critical, and no firm data were available to support mechanisms.

Purpose The data on the diagnostic contribution of general internal medicine (GIM) consultations for undiagnosed health problems from specialists are scarce. This study aims to explore the role of generalists as diagnostic medicine consultants in tertiary care settings. Patients and Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study at a Japanese university hospital. GIM consultations for diagnosis from other departments on outpatients aged ≧ 20 years from January 2018 to December 2020 were included. Data were extracted from electronic medical records. The primary outcome was new diagnosis rates. The secondary outcomes were new diagnosis rates with clinical significance and clinical outcomes at 90 days from the index visit. Results A total of 328 patients were included. The top five consulting departments were orthopedics (17.0%), cardiovascular (10.3%), otorhinolaryngology (8.8%), neurology (8.8%), and gastroenterology (7.9%). GIM identified 456 chief complaints (CCs), and the top five were fever (10.9%), abnormal laboratory results (8.3%), fatigue (5.9%), and pain (7.4%) or numbness (4.6%) in the extremities. There were 139 (104/328 patients: 31.8%) specialty consultations from GIM, and the top five departments were rheumatology (21.1%), gastroenterology (19.2%), orthopedics (9.6%), psychiatry (9.6%), and neurology (9.6%). In total, 277 new diagnoses were established in 232 patients (70.7%), and 203 patients had new diagnoses with clinical significance (61.8%). Clinical outcomes at 90 days from the time of the index visit were resolution/improvement (60.7%), unchanged/worsened (22.3%), and unknown (17.0%). Conclusion Over 70% of GIM consultations from other departments established new diagnoses with favorable outcomes in >60% of the patients.

Purpose The general internal medicine (GIM) department can be an effective diagnostic coordinator for undiagnosed outpatients. We investigated the contribution of GIM consultations to the diagnosis of patients admitted to specialty departments in hospitals in Japan that have not yet adopted a hospitalist system. Patients and Methods This single-center, retrospective observational study was conducted at a university hospital in Japan. GIM consultations from other departments on inpatients aged ≥20 years, from April 2016 to March 2021, were included. Data were extracted from electronic medical records, and consultation purposes were categorized into diagnosis, treatment, and diagnosis and treatment. The primary outcome was new diagnosis during hospitalization for patients with consultation purpose of diagnosis or diagnosis and treatment. The secondary outcomes were the purposes of consultation with the Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine department. Results In total, 342 patients were included in the analysis. The purpose of the consultations was diagnosis for 253 patients (74%), treatment for 60 (17.5%), and diagnosis and treatment for 29 patients (8.5%). In 282 consultations for diagnosis and diagnosis and treatment, 179 new diagnoses were established for 162 patients (57.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 51.5–63.3). Conclusion The GIM department can function as a diagnostic consultant for inpatients with diagnostic problems admitted to other specialty departments in hospitals where hospitalist or other similar systems are not adopted.

Images in…In conclusion, foreign body ingestion or aspiration in the laryngopharynx can present very subtle symptoms even when a large denture is the cause.

The effect of antibiotics administered before blood cultures performed in general internal medicine outpatient settings is not well known. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control study including adult patients who underwent blood cultures in the general internal medicine outpatient department of a Japanese university hospital between 2016 and 2022. Patients with positive blood cultures were included as cases and matched patients with negative blood cultures were included as controls. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: A total of 200 patients and 200 controls were included. Antibiotics were administered prior to blood culture in 20% of patients (79/400). Oral antibiotics were prescribed to 69.6% of the prior antibiotics (55/79). Prior antibiotic use was significantly lower among patients with positive than negative blood cultures (13.5% vs 26.0%, p = 0.002) and was an independent predictive factor in univariable (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.73; p = 0.002) and multivariable (adjusted odds ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.63; p = 0.002) logistic regression models for positive blood culture. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of the multivariable model for predicting positive blood cultures was 0.86. Conclusion: There was a negative correlation between prior antibiotic use and positive blood cultures in the general internal medicine outpatient department. Therefore, physicians should interpret the negative results of blood cultures performed after the administration of antibiotics with care.