Growing evidence highlights a role for mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress as underlying contributors to Parkinson's disease (PD) pathogenesis. DJ-1 (PARK7) is a recently identified recessive familial PD gene. Its loss leads to increased susceptibility of neurons to oxidative stress and death. However, its mechanism of action is not fully understood. Presently, we report that DJ-1 deficiency in cell lines, cultured neurons, mouse brain and lymphoblast cells derived from DJ-1 patients display aberrant mitochondrial morphology. We also show that these DJ-1-dependent mitochondrial defects contribute to oxidative stress-induced sensitivity to cell death since reversal of this fragmented mitochondrial phenotype abrogates neuronal cell death. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) appear to play a critical role in the observed defects, as ROS scavengers rescue the phenotype and mitochondria isolated from DJ-1 deficient animals produce more ROS compared with control. Importantly, the aberrant mitochondrial phenotype can be rescued by the expression of Pink1 and Parkin, two PD-linked genes involved in regulating mitochondrial dynamics and quality control. Finally, we show that DJ-1 deficiency leads to altered autophagy in murine and human cells. Our findings define a mechanism by which the DJ-1-dependent mitochondrial defects contribute to the increased sensitivity to oxidative stress-induced cell death that has been previously reported.

No abstract

SUMMARY Gene regulation often results from the action of multiple transcription factors (TFs) acting at a promoter, obscuring the individual regulatory effect of each TF on RNA polymerase (RNAP). Here we measure the fundamental regulatory interactions of TFs in E. coli by designing synthetic target genes that isolate individual TFs’ regulatory effects. Using a thermodynamic model, each TF’s regulatory interactions are decoupled from TF occupancy and interpreted as acting through (de)stabilization of RNAP and (de)acceleration of transcription initiation. We find that the contribution of each mechanism depends on TF identity and binding location; regulation immediately downstream of the promoter is insensitive to TF identity, but the same TFs regulate by distinct mechanisms upstream of the promoter. These two mechanisms are uncoupled and can act coherently, to reinforce the observed regulatory role (activation/repression), or incoherently, wherein the TF regulates two distinct steps with opposing effects.

Bacillus subtilis genome is predicted to encode numerous ribonucleases, including four 3’ exoribonucleases that have been characterized to some extent. A strain containing gene knockouts of all four known 3’ exoribonucleases is viable, suggesting that one or more additional RNases remain to be discovered. A protein extract from the quadruple RNase mutant strain was fractionated and RNase activity was followed, resulting in identification of an enzyme activity catalyzed by the YloC protein. YloC is an endoribonuclease and is a member of the highly conserved “YicC family” of proteins that is widespread in bacteria. YloC is a metal-dependent enzyme that catalyzes cleavage of single-stranded RNA, preferentially at U residues, and exists in an oligomeric form, most likely a hexamer. As such, YloC shares some characteristics with the SARS-CoV Nsp15 endoribonuclease. While the in vivo function of YloC in B. subtilis is yet to be determined, YloC was found to act similarly to YicC in an Escherichia coli in vivo assay that assesses decay of the small RNA, RyhB. Thus, YloC may play a role in small RNA regulation.

No abstract

Gene regulation often results from the action of multiple transcription factors (TFs) acting at a promoter, with a net regulation that depends on both the direct interactions of TFs with RNA polymerase (RNAP) and the indirect interactions with each other. Here we measure the fundamental regulatory interactions of TFs in E. coli by designing synthetic target genes that isolate the individual TFs regulatory effect. Using a thermodynamic model, the direct regulatory impact of the TF on RNAP is decoupled from TF occupancy and interpreted as acting through two mechanisms: (de)stabilization of RNAP and (de)acceleration of transcription initiation. We find the contributions of each mechanism depends on TF identity and binding location; for the set of TFs profiled, regulation immediately downstream of the promoter is insensitive to TF identity, yet these same TFs regulate by distinct mechanisms upstream of the promoter. Strikingly, we observe two fundamental regulatory paradigms with these two mechanisms acting coherently, to reinforce the observed regulatory role (activation or repression), or incoherently, where the TF regulates two distinct steps with opposing effect. This insight provides critical information on the scope of TF-RNAP regulation allowing for a stronger approach to characterize the endogenous regulatory function of TFs.

Predicting the quantitative regulatory function of transcription factors (TFs) based on factors such as binding sequence, binding location, and promoter type is not possible. The interconnected nature of gene networks and the difficulty in tuning individual TF concentrations make the isolated study of TF function challenging. Here, we present a library of Escherichia coli strains designed to allow for precise control of the concentration of individual TFs enabling the study of the role of TF concentration on physiology and regulation. We demonstrate the usefulness of this resource by measuring the regulatory function of the zinc‐responsive TF, ZntR, and the paralogous TF pair, GalR/GalS. For ZntR, we find that zinc alters ZntR regulatory function in a way that enables activation of the regulated gene to be robust with respect to ZntR concentration. For GalR and GalS, we are able to demonstrate that these paralogous TFs have fundamentally distinct regulatory roles beyond differences in binding affinity.

The ability to rapidly change bacterial gene expression programs in response to environmental conditions is highly dependent on the efficient turnover of mRNA. While much is known about the regulation of gene expression at the transcriptional and translational levels, much less is known about the intermediate step of mRNA decay.