No abstract

No abstract

Maxillofacial trauma is any physical injury to the facial bones. Facial bones are frequently fractured bones in RTA, Assault, Domestic violence etc. Facial trauma includes Maxillary fractures, Mandibular fractures, Orbital Fractures, Nasal Bone Fractures, soft tissue injury such as lacerations, bruises etc. Over the years, there are many refinements in the management of maxillofacial trauma. The incidence of maxillofacial trauma is more in males because they are involved in more physical activities and assault compared to women. In Older times for facial bone fractures, surgeons performed maxillomandibular fixation using wire osteosynthesis for minimum three weeks to 6 weeks, and mouth opening was difficult, poor oral hygiene leading to periodontal problems, difficulty in speech and masticatory functions. The management of maxillofacial trauma includes the use of Maxillomandibular fixation using wire osteosynthesis, conventional mini plates and 3-D plates. For the management of facial bone fractures, Maxillofacial surgeons perform open reduction and internal fixation(ORIF) whenever needed. In the case of ORIF, Surgeons use mini plates either 3D or Conventional Plates for stabilising the fractured segments. This technique requires skill and experience and is also expensive. The advantages of this method are improved quality of life. The objective of this review is to compare 3-Dimensional plates and Conventional Plates in Maxillofacial trauma.

Face is the seat of an individual's identity. Hence treatment plan and execution of corrective esthetic surgeries are challenging. The average age at which patients become selfaware of dentofacial deformities and seek professional help is usually in the second decade of life when they begin to develop a sense of individualistic identity to integrate into the society. However, it is observed that individuals in the older age groups are seeking treatment for correction of dentofacial deformities. The aim of this study was to identify the age at which individuals report for orthognathic surgery. For the purpose of this study, data collection was done retrospectively from the hospital archives for patients undergoing orthognathic surgery during a period of ten months from June 2019 to March 2020. In our study it was observed that despite differences in chief complaints, 54.17% females and 45.83% males seek jaw corrective procedures. Though the association between age of patients and osteotomy procedure was not of statistical significance (p=0.470 > 0.05), there was a substantial increase in those seeking treatment in the fourth decade of life (16.67%) implying a marked clinical significance. This increase is due to the multidisciplinary team involved in functional rehabilitation of patients in this age group.

Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) are one of the most common complications of any intervention in the maxillofacial region. Most of the times sutures used for wound approximation act as a nidus of bacterial accumulation and subsequent infection due to the presence of scores of microbes in and around the oral cavity. This has been attributed to the wicking action associated with braided sutures. Various methods to prevent surgical site infections are reported in literature, the most recent being use of antibacterial coated sutures. Sutures are either coated with triclosan or chlorhexidine or a combination of anti-microbial agents and fatty acids. These sutures are known to have a significant role in the prevention of SSIs elsewhere in the body, but the role in oral cavity remains questionable. This study aims to establish the role of chlorhexidine coated sutures in the prevention of surgical site infections if any. Chlorhexidine-coated and uncoated suture materials were used in 17 patients undergoing third molar extractions. Seven days post-operatively the sutures were removed, and bacteria were isolated. Following which colony-forming units (CFU/ml) were counted. Concerning the total number of oral pathogens, that adhered to suture material, no reduction was demonstrated for Chlorhexidine coated sutures. The use of chlorhexidine-coated suture material offers no advantage in intraoral surgery.