The rich diversity of morphology and behavior displayed across primate species provides an informative context in which to study the impact of genomic diversity on fundamental biological processes. Analysis of that diversity provides insight into long-standing questions in evolutionary and conservation biology and is urgent given severe threats these species are facing. Here, we present high-coverage whole-genome data from 233 primate species representing 86% of genera and all 16 families. This dataset was used, together with fossil calibration, to create a nuclear DNA phylogeny and to reassess evolutionary divergence times among primate clades. We found within-species genetic diversity across families and geographic regions to be associated with climate and sociality, but not with extinction risk. Furthermore, mutation rates differ across species, potentially influenced by effective population sizes. Lastly, we identified extensive recurrence of missense mutations previously thought to be human specific. This study will open a wide range of research avenues for future primate genomic research.
In a recent paper, "Environmental DNA: What's behind the term? Clarifying the terminology and recommendations for its future use in biomonitoring," Pawlowski et al. argue that the term eDNA should be used to refer to the pool of DNA isolated from environmental samples, as opposed to only extra-organismal DNA from macro-organisms. We agree with this view. However, we are concerned that their proposed two-level terminology specifying sampling environment and targeted taxa is overly simplistic and might hinder rather than improve clear communication about environmental DNA and its use in biomonitoring. This terminology is based on categories that are often difficult to assign and uninformative, and it overlooks a fundamental distinction within eDNA: the type of DNA (organismal or extra-organismal) from which ecological interpretations are derived.This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Personalized genome sequencing has revealed millions of genetic differences between individuals, but our understanding of their clinical relevance remains largely incomplete. To systematically decipher the effects of human genetic variants, we obtained whole-genome sequencing data for 809 individuals from 233 primate species and identified 4.3 million common protein-altering variants with orthologs in humans. We show that these variants can be inferred to have nondeleterious effects in humans based on their presence at high allele frequencies in other primate populations. We use this resource to classify 6% of all possible human protein-altering variants as likely benign and impute the pathogenicity of the remaining 94% of variants with deep learning, achieving state-of-the-art accuracy for diagnosing pathogenic variants in patients with genetic diseases.
In a recent paper, “Environmental DNA: What’s behind the term?
Clarifying the terminology and recommendations for its future use in
biomonitoring”, Pawlowski et al. argue that the term eDNA should be
used to refer to the pool of DNA isolated from environmental samples, as
opposed to only extra-organismal DNA from macro-organisms. We agree with
this view. However, we are concerned that their proposed two-level
terminology specifying sampling environment and targeted taxa is overly
simplistic and might hinder rather than improve clear communication
about environmental DNA and its use in biomonitoring. Not only is this
terminology based on categories that are often difficult to assign and
uninformative, but it ignores what is in our opinion the most important
distinction within eDNA: the type of DNA (organismal or
extra-organismal) from which ecological interpretations are derived.
The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, which in humans leads to the disease COVID-19, has caused global disruption and more than 2 million fatalities since it first emerged in late 2019. As we write, infection rates are at their highest point globally and are rising extremely rapidly in some areas due to more infectious variants. The primary target of SARS-CoV-2 is the cellular receptor angiotensin-converting
Biodiversity is declining on a planetary scale at an alarming rate due to anthropogenic factors. Classical biodiversity monitoring approaches are time-consuming, resource-intensive, and not scalable to address the current biodiversity crisis. The environmental DNA-based next-generation biomonitoring framework provides an efficient, scalable, and holistic solution for evaluating changes in various ecological entities. However, its scope is currently limited to monitoring targeted groups of organisms using metabarcoding, which suffers from various PCR-induced biases. To utilise the full potential of next-generation biomonitoring, we intended to develop PCR-free genomic technologies that can deliver unbiased biodiversity data across the tree of life in a single assay. Here, we present a novel metagenomic workflow comprising of a lysis-free extracellular DNA enrichment protocol from large-volume filtered water samples, a completely PCR-free library preparation step, an ultra-deep next-generation sequencing, and a pseudo-taxonomic assignment strategy using the dual lowest common ancestor algorithm. We demonstrate the utility of our approach in a pilot-scale spatially-replicated experimental setup in Chilika, a large hyper-diverse brackish lagoon ecosystem in India. Using incidence-based statistics, we show that biodiversity across the tree of life, from microorganisms to the relatively low-abundant macroorganisms such as Arthropods and Fishes, can be effectively detected with about one billion paired-end reads using our reproducible workflow. With decreasing costs of sequencing and the increasing availability of genomic resources from the earth biogenome project, our approach can be tested in different ecosystems and adapted for large-scale rapid assessment of biodiversity across the tree of life. *1
The rich diversity of morphology and behavior displayed across primate species provides an informative context in which to study the impact of genomic diversity on fundamental biological processes. Analysis of that diversity provides insight into long-standing questions in evolutionary and conservation biology, and is urgent given severe threats these species are facing. Here, we present high coverage whole-genome data from 233 primate species representing 86% of genera and all 16 families. This dataset was used, together with fossil calibration, to create a nuclear DNA phylogeny and to reassess evolutionary divergence times among primate clades. We found within-species genetic diversity across families and geographic regions to be associated with climate and sociality, but not with extinction risk. Furthermore, mutation rates differ across species, potentially influenced by effective population sizes. Lastly, we identified extensive recurrence of missense mutations previously thought to be human-specific. This study will open a wide range of research avenues for future primate genomic research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.