ESD achieved similar oncological outcomes when compared with radical gastrectomy for treatment of EGC. Patients receiving ESD had better perioperative outcomes in terms of operative time, complication rate, and hospital stay.
Purpose To evaluate the long-term biochemical, clinical, and recurrence outcomes of radiofrequency (RF) ablation in treating primary aldosteronism due to aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA). Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. The use of computed tomographically (CT) guided percutaneous RF ablation was evaluated in 36 patients (19 men; mean age ± standard deviation, 52.1 years ± 10.4) with APA (17 right and 19 left side; mean size, 15.5 mm ± 5.0). Primary aldosteronism was confirmed by using the oral sodium-loading test. After RF ablation, CT images, aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR), serum potassium level, and blood pressure control were assessed at 3 months and at the latest follow-up examination. Long-term treatment success was defined as normalization of ARR at the latest assessment. Comparison of ARR, potassium, and blood pressure levels before and after RF ablation was performed by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results Primary technical success was achieved in 33 (92%) patients who underwent a single RF ablation session. Secondary technical success was achieved in three (8%) patients who required a second RF ablation. At 3-month follow-up, primary aldosteronism was resolved in 33 (92%) patients, with a starting median ARR of 8583 pmol/L per µg/(L · h) that normalized to 97 pmol/L per µg/(L · h) (P < .01). Mean serum potassium levels increased from 2.6 mmol/L ± 0.4 to 4.0 mmol/L ± 0.3 (P = .01). At long-term follow-up (mean, 6.2 years ± 2.5), treatment success was maintained in 33 patients (92%), all of whom had ARRs in the normal range (P < .01). The long-term recurrence rate was 0%. Hypokalemia was resolved in all patients (2.6 mmol/L ± 0.4 to 4.1 mmol/L ± 0.3, P = .01). Hypertension was resolved in 13 (36%) patients, and its control was improved in seven (19%) patients. One (3%) patient had major complications and six (17%) had minor complications. Conclusion CT-guided RF ablation is an effective treatment for APA, with high sustainable long-term treatment success. It may serve as a justifiable treatment alternative to surgery and medical therapy for APA. RSNA, 2016.
While open thyroidectomy (OT) is advocated as the gold standard treatment for differentiated thyroid cancer, the contemporary use of robotic thyroidectomy (RT) is often controversial. Although RT combines the unique benefits of the surgical robot and remote access thyroidectomy, its applicability on cancer patients is challenged by the questionable oncological benefits and safety. This review aims to analyze the current literature evidence in comparing RT to OT on thyroid cancers for their perioperative and oncological outcomes. To date, no randomized controlled trial is available in comparing RT to OT. All published studies are nonrandomized or retrospective comparisons. Current data suggests that RT compares less favorably than OT for longer operative time, higher cost, and possibly inferior oncological control with lower number of central lymph nodes retrieved. In terms of morbidity, quality of life outcomes, and short-term recurrence rates, RT and OT are comparable. While conventional OT continues to be appropriate for most thyroid cancers, RT should better be continued by expert surgeons on selected patients who have low-risk thyroid cancers and have high expectations on cosmetic outcomes. Future research should embark on prospective randomized studies for unbiased comparisons. Long-term follow-up studies are also needed to evaluate outcomes on recurrence and survival.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.