An international panel of experts prepared an evidenced-based guideline for vaccination of immunocompromised adults and children. These guidelines are intended for use by primary care and subspecialty providers who care for immunocompromised patients. Evidence was often limited. Areas that warrant future investigation are highlighted.

An international panel of experts prepared an evidenced-based guideline for vaccination of immunocompromised adults and children. These guidelines are intended for use by primary care and subspecialty providers who care for immunocompromised patients. Evidence was often limited. Areas that warrant future investigation are highlighted.

Background Little is known about what primary care physicians (PCPs) and patients would expect if patients were invited to read their doctors' office notes. Objective To explore attitudes toward potential benefits or harms if PCPs offered patients ready access to visit notes. Design The PCPs and patients completed surveys before joining a voluntary program that provided electronic links to doctors' notes. Setting Primary care practices in 3 U.S. states. Participants Participating and nonparticipating PCPs and adult patients at primary care practices in Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and Washington. Measurements Doctors' and patients' attitudes toward and expectations of open visit notes, their ideas about the potential benefits and risks, and demographic characteristics. Results 110 of 114 participating PCPs (96%), 63 of 140 nonparticipating PCPs (45%), and 37 856 of 90 826 patients (42%) completed surveys. Overall, 69% to 81% of participating PCPs across the 3 sites and 92% to 97% of patients thought open visit notes were a good idea, compared with 16% to 33% of nonparticipating PCPs. Similarly, participating PCPs and patients generally agreed with statements about potential benefits of open visit notes, whereas nonparticipating PCPs were less likely to agree. Among participating PCPs, 74% to 92% anticipated improved communication and patient education, in contrast to 45% to 67% of nonparticipating PCPs. More than one half of participating PCPs (50% to 58%) and most nonparticipating PCPs (88% to 92%) expected that open visit notes would result in greater worry among patients; far fewer patients concurred (12% to 16%). Thirty-six percent to 50% of participating PCPs and 83% to 84% of nonparticipating PCPs anticipated more patient questions between visits. Few PCPs (0% to 33%) anticipated increased risk for lawsuits. Patient enthusiasm extended across age, education, and health status, and 22% anticipated sharing visit notes with others, including other doctors. Limitations Access to electronic patient portals is not widespread, and participation was limited to patients using such portals. Response rates were higher among participating PCPs than nonparticipating PCPs; many participating PCPs had small patient panels. Conclusion Among PCPs, opinions about open visit notes varied widely in terms of predicting the effect on their practices and benefits for patients. In contrast, patients expressed considerable enthusiasm and few fears, anticipating both improved understanding and more involvement in care. Sharing visit notes has broad implications for quality of care, privacy, and shared accountability.

Cumulative incidence and features of IRIS varied depending on the OI. IRIS occurred in >10% of patients with KS, tuberculosis, or Cryptococcus. Visceral KS-IRIS led to considerable morbidity and mortality.

No abstract

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is frequently employed for the management of critically ill patients with respiratory failure. A major complication of mechanical ventilation (MV) is the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), in which Staphylococcus aureus is a prominent pathogen. Moreover, previous studies suggest that MV may be an important cofactor in the development of acute lung injury (ALI) and the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). S. aureus pulmonary infection was induced in spontaneously breathing mice (C57Bl/6) or mechanically ventilated mice to determine whether MV contributes to the development of ALI and/or systemic inflammation. The combination of MV and bacteria significantly increased the influx of neutrophils into bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), augmented pulmonary production of the proinflammatory cytokines KC, MIP-2, TNF-a, and IL-6, and increased alveolar-capillary permeability to proteins. MV also induced proinflammatory cytokine expression in peripheral blood, associated with extrapulmonary hepatic and renal dysfunction. Surprisingly, bacterial clearance in the lungs and extrapulmonary bacterial dissemination was not affected by MV. These data indicate that MV exacerbates both pulmonary and systemic inflammation in response to bacteria and contributes to the pathogenesis of both ALI and the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, without necessarily affecting bacterial clearance or extra-pulmonary bacterial dissemination.

Background Improving patient retention in HIV care is crucial to improving the HIV care continuum. We instituted and evaluated a relinkage program that uses clinical data to identify potentially out-of-care patients, matches those data to public health surveillance, and employs a linkage specialist (LS) to coordinate care relinkage. Methods The intervention began November 1, 2012 in the largest HIV clinic in Washington State. We evaluated program outcomes and compared patient outcomes in the year following initiation of the intervention to a historical control cohort of patients. Cox proportional hazard ratios were used to compare time to relinkage to care between cohorts, and regression models using generalized estimated equations were preformed to examine secondary outcomes of relinkage to care, engagement in care, and viral suppression. Results 753 patients were identified as “out of care” on 11/1/12. Matching with surveillance data and initial LS investigations found that 596 (79%) of these patients had moved, transferred care or were incarcerated. Of the 157 remaining patients: 40 (25%) relinked to care before LS contact, and the LS successfully contacted 38 (24%). A total of 116 (15%) patients in the intervention cohort relinked to care and 24 (20%) were contacted by the LS. Compared to the historical cohort, the time to relinkage was shorter among patients in the intervention cohort [adjusted HR=1.7 (1.2-2.3)] and a greater proportion relinked [15% vs. 10%]. Conclusions This clinic-based, surveillance-informed relinkage intervention showed statistically significant but modest effectiveness in returning out-of-care patients to HIV care compared to historical controls.

Background Approximately 15% of HIV-infected MSM engaged in HIV primary care have been diagnosed with an STI in the past year, yet STI testing frequency remains low. Methods We sought to quantify STI testing frequencies at a large, urban HIV care clinic, and to identify patient- and provider-related barriers to increased STI testing. We extracted laboratory data in aggregate from the electronic medical record to calculate STI testing frequencies (defined as the number of HIV-infected MSM engaged in care who were tested at least once over an 18-month period divided by the number of MSM engaged in care). We created anonymous surveys of patients and providers to elicit barriers. Results Extra-genital gonorrhea and chlamydia testing were low (29%–32%), but the frequency of syphilis testing was higher (72%). Patients frequently reported high-risk behaviors, including drug use (16.4%) and recent bacterial STI (25.5%), as well as substantial rates of recent testing (>60% in prior 6 months). Most (72%) reported testing for STI in HIV primary care, but one-third went elsewhere for “easier” (42%), anonymous (21%) or more frequent (16%) testing. HIV primary care providers lacked testing and treatment knowledge (25–32%), and cited lack of time (68%), discomfort with sexual history taking and genital exam (21%), and patient reluctance (39%) as barriers to increased STI testing. Conclusion STI testing in HIV care remains unacceptably low. Enhanced education of providers, along with strategies to decrease provider time and increase patient ease and frequency of STI testing, are needed.