Severity-correlated enlargement of the median nerve occurs in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). We determined whether measurement of the nerve cross-sectional area was useful in making the diagnosis of CTS. In 414 wrists of 275 patients with clinically diagnosed idiopathic CTS and 408 wrists of 408 controls, we made ultrasonographic measurements of the nerve area at the distal (distal edge of the flexor retinaculum), mid (hook of the hamate), and proximal carpal tunnel (wrist crease). Criteria based on the area at a single level yielded sensitivities of 43-57% and specificities of 96-97%. Use of the mean carpal nerve area (average of the areas at the three levels) improved the results (sensitivity, 67%; specificity, 97%), which was as sensitive as the nerve conduction studies (NCS). In the NCS, we obtained sensitivities of 66% for the distal motor nerve latency and 67% for the distal sensory nerve latency, with specificities of 97% for each. A combination of the mean carpal nerve area and NCS criteria yielded a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 94%. The clinical implications of these findings for the diagnosis of CTS are discussed.
To cite this article: Fuji T, Fujita S, Tachibana S, Kawai Y. A dose-ranging study evaluating the oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8: 2458-68.
Motion of the median nerve was compared on an axial ultrasonographic image in the mid-carpal tunnel in 30 wrists of 15 women with bilateral idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome and 30 wrists of 15 healthy women. During passive flexion and extension of the index finger, the control wrists had transverse sliding of the nerve beneath the flexor retinaculum (1.75 +/- 0.49 mm), which was regarded as a physiological phenomenon. In contrast, the wrists of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome had significantly less sliding (0.37 +/- 0.34 mm; P = 0.0001), which indicates that physiological motion of the nerve is restricted. This decrease in nerve mobility may be of significance in the pathophysiology of carpal tunnel syndrome.
BackgroundIn the absence of thromboprophylaxis, patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of edoxaban with enoxaparin for the prevention of VTE after THA in Japan.MethodsThis was a phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority study. Patients undergoing elective, unilateral primary THA were randomized to receive edoxaban 30 mg once daily (n = 307) or enoxaparin 2000 IU (equivalent to 20 mg) twice daily (n = 303) for 11 to 14 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of VTE. Safety endpoints included the incidence of major or clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM) bleeding.ResultsThe incidence of VTE, based on venography and clinical surveillance, was 2.4 % in the edoxaban group and 6.9 % in the enoxaparin group (P <0.001). The absolute difference in the incidence of VTE was −4.5 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: −8.6, −0.9), which was within the noninferiority margin set at 8 % for the difference and established the noninferiority of edoxaban to enoxaparin. Since the upper limit of the 95 % CI of the absolute difference was less than 0 %, the superiority of edoxaban over enoxaparin was demonstrated. The incidence of major or CRNM bleeding was 2.6 % in the edoxaban group and 3.7 % in the enoxaparin group (P = 0.475).ConclusionsOral edoxaban 30 mg once daily was superior to subcutaneous enoxaparin 2000 IU twice daily in the prevention of VTE following THA without increasing the risk for major or CRNM bleeding.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.