Fibroepithelial lesions of the breast are commonly seen in clinical practice. The masses are composed of a combination of prominent stroma and varying glandular elements. Fibroadenomas, benign lesions that derive from the terminal duct lobular unit, are the most common and are often identified at clinical examination or mammography as circumscribed masses. Benign mesenchymal tumors include focal fibrosis, pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia, and fibromatosis or desmoid tumor. Phyllodes tumor, which is similar to fibroadenoma but has increased cellularity in the stroma, is typically benign but has malignant potential. Diabetic fibrous mastopathy, a stromal proliferation found in patients with juvenile-onset insulin-dependent diabetes, is a reactive fibrous lesion. Most of these lesions manifest as masses at clinical and/or mammographic examination. Some (eg, fibroadenomas) may be associated with calcifications. Except for fibromatosis and phyllodes tumor, fibroepithelial lesions need not be excised if the diagnosis is confirmed by the results of histologic analysis at percutaneous biopsy. To correctly differentiate between fibrous breast lesions that are benign and those that should be resected, the physician must be familiar with the correlated radiologic-pathologic findings in the various lesion types.

No abstract

Neurovascular imaging studies are routinely used for the assessment of headaches and changes in mental status, stroke workup, and evaluation of the arteriovenous structures of the head and neck. These imaging studies are being performed with greater frequency as the aging population continues to increase. Magnetic resonance (MR) angiographic imaging techniques are helpful in this setting. However, mastering these techniques requires an in-depth understanding of the basic principles of physics, complex flow patterns, and the correlation of MR angiographic findings with conventional MR imaging findings. More than one imaging technique may be used to solve difficult cases, with each technique contributing unique information. Unfortunately, incorporating findings obtained with multiple imaging modalities may add to the diagnostic challenge. To ensure diagnostic accuracy, it is essential that the radiologist carefully evaluate the details provided by these modalities in light of basic physics principles, the fundamentals of various imaging techniques, and common neurovascular imaging pitfalls.

No abstract