Background: Extensive mapping efforts are currently underway for the establishment of comparative genomics between the model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana and various Brassica species. Most of these studies have deployed RFLP markers, the use of which is a laborious and time-consuming process. We therefore tested the efficacy of PCR-based Intron Polymorphism (IP) markers to analyze genome-wide synteny between the oilseed crop, Brassica juncea (AABB genome) and A. thaliana and analyzed the arrangement of 24 (previously described) genomic block segments in the A, B and C Brassica genomes to study the evolutionary events contributing to karyotype variations in the three diploid Brassica genomes.
A major component of the plant nuclear genome is constituted by different classes of repetitive DNA sequences. The structural, functional and evolutionary aspects of the satellite repetitive DNA families, and their organization in the chromosomes is reviewed. The tandem satellite DNA sequences exhibit characteristic chromosomal locations, usually at subtelomeric and centromeric regions. The repetitive DNA family(ies) may be widely distributed in a taxonomic family or a genus, or may be specific for a species, genome or even a chromosome. They may acquire large-scale variations in their sequence and copy number over an evolutionary time-scale. These features have formed the basis of extensive utilization of repetitive sequences for taxonomic and phylogenetic studies. Hybrid polyploids have especially proven to be excellent models for studying the evolution of repetitive DNA sequences. Recent studies explicitly show that some repetitive DNA families localized at the telomeres and centromeres have acquired important structural and functional significance. The repetitive elements are under different evolutionary constraints as compared to the genes. Satellite DNA families are thought to arise de novo as a consequence of molecular mechanisms such as unequal crossing over, rolling circle amplification, replication slippage and mutation that constitute “molecular drive”.
Quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis of yield influencing traits was carried out in Brassica juncea (AABB) using a doubled haploid (DH) mapping population of 123 lines derived from a cross between Varuna (a line representing the Indian gene pool) and Heera (representing the east European gene pool) to identify potentially useful alleles from both the parents. The existing AFLP based map of B. juncea was further saturated with RFLP and SSR markers which led to the identification of the linkage groups belonging to the A (B. rapa) and B (B. nigra) genome components of B. juncea. For QTL dissection, the DH lines were evaluated at three different environments and phenotyped for 12 quantitative traits. A total of 65 QTL spread over 13 linkage groups (LG) were identified from the three environments. QTL analysis showed that the A genome has contributed more than the B genome to productivity (68% of the total QTL detected) suggesting a more prominent role of the A genome towards domestication of this crop. The east European line, Heera, carried favorable alleles for 42% of the detected QTL and the remaining 58% were in the Indian gene pool line, Varuna. We observed clustering of major QTL in a few linkage groups, particularly in J7 and J10 of the A genome, with QTL of different traits having agronomically antagonistic allelic effects co-mapping to the same genetic interval. QTL analysis also identified some well-separated QTL which could be readily transferred between the two pools. Based on the QTL analysis, we propose that improvement in yield could be achieved more readily by heterosis breeding rather than by pure line breeding.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.