dIn clinical microbiology, bacterial identification is labor-intensive and time-consuming. A solution for this problem is the use of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). In this study, we evaluated a modified protein extraction method of identification performed on target plates (on-plate extraction method) with MALDI-TOF (Bruker Microflex LT with Biotyper version 3.0) and compared it to 2 previously described methods: the direct colony method and a standard protein extraction method (standard extraction method). We evaluated the species of 273 clinical strains and 14 reference strains of staphylococci. All isolates were characterized using the superoxide dismutase A sequence as a reference. For the species identification, the on-plate, standard extraction, and direct colony methods identified 257 isolates (89.5%), 232 isolates (80.8%), and 173 isolates (60.2%), respectively, with statistically significant differences among the three methods (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the on-plate extraction method is at least as good as standard extraction in identification rate and has the advantage of a shorter processing time.
Introduction: Several antigen tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been developed worldwide, but their clinical utility has not been well established. In this study, we evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of QuickNavi™-COVID19 Ag, a newly developed antigen test in Japan. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at a PCR center between October 7 and December 5, 2020. The included patients were referred from a local public health center and 89 primary care facilities. We simultaneously obtained two nasopharyngeal samples with flocked swabs; one was used for the antigen test and the other for real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). Using the results of real-time RT-PCR as a reference, the performance of the antigen test was evaluated. Results: A total of 1186 patients were included in this study, and the real-time RT-PCR detected SARS-CoV-2 in 105 (8.9%). Of these 105 patients, 33 (31.4%) were asymptomatic. The antigen test provided a 98.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 98.0%e99.4%) concordance rate with real-time RT-PCR, along with a sensitivity of 86.7% (95% CI: 78.6%e92.5%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 99.7%e100%). False-negatives were observed in 14 patients, 8 of whom were asymptomatic and had a low viral load (cycle threshold (Ct) > 30). In symptomatic patients, the sensitivity was 91.7% (95% CI: 82.7%e96.9%). Conclusion: QuickNavi™-COVID19 Ag showed high specificity and sufficient sensitivity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. This test is a promising potential diagnostic modality especially in symptomatic patients.
The clinical utility of antigen test using anterior nasal samples has not been well evaluated. We conducted a prospective study in a drive-through testing site located at a PCR center to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the antigen test QuickNavi-COVID19 Ag using anterior nasal samples and to compare the degrees of coughs or sneezes induction and the severity of pain between anterior nasal collection and nasopharyngeal collection. The study included a total of 862 participants, of which 91.6% were symptomatic. The median duration from symptom onset to sample collection was 2.0 days. Fifty-one participants tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 on reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) with nasopharyngeal samples, and all of them were symptomatic. In comparison to the findings of RT-PCR, the antigen test using anterior nasal samples showed 72.5% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 58.3–84.1%) and 100% specificity (95% CI 99.3–100%). Anterior nasal collection was associated with a significantly lower degree of coughs or sneezes induction and the severity of pain in comparison to nasopharyngeal collection (p < 0.001). The antigen test using anterior nasal samples showed moderate sensitivity in symptomatic patients who were at the early stages of the disease course but was less painful and induced fewer coughs or sneezes.
b Metallo--lactamases (MBLs) are transmissible carbapenemases of increasing prevalence in Gram-negative bacteria among health care facilities worldwide. Control of the further spread of these carbapenem-resistant bacteria relies on clinical microbiological laboratories correctly identifying and classifying the MBLs. In this study, we evaluated a simple and rapid method for detecting IMP, the most prevalent MBL in Japan. We used an immunochromatography (IC) assay for 181 carbapenem-nonsusceptible (CNS) (nonsusceptible to imipenem or meropenem) strains comprising 74 IMP-producing and 33 non-IMP-producing strains of non-glucose-fermenting Gram-negative rods (NFGNR), as well as 64 IMP-producing and 10 non-IMP-producing Enterobacteriaceae strains. The IC assay results were compared to those from the double-disk synergy test (DDST), the MBL Etest, and the modified Hodge test (MHT) (only for Enterobacteriaceae). The IMP type was confirmed by specific PCR and direct sequencing. The IC assay detected all of the IMP-type MBLs, including IMP-1, -2, -6, -7, -10, -11, -19, -20, and -22 and IMP-40, -41, and -42 (new types), with 100% specificity and sensitivity against all strains tested. Although the sensitivity and specificity values for the DDST and MHT were equivalent to those for the IC assay, the MBL Etest was positive for only 87% of NFGNR and 31% of Enterobacteriaceae due to the low MIC of imipenem, causing an indeterminate evaluation. These results indicated that the IC assay might be a useful alternative to PCR for IMP MBL detection screening. The recent worldwide emergence and dissemination of carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative rods (GNR) that are resistant to carbapenems is a significant concern with respect to patient care and infection control strategies (1). The transmissible carbapenemases are divided into three different classes, class A (serine carbapenemases, such as Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase [KPC]), class B (metallo--lactamases [MBLs], such as IMP, VIM, and NDM), and class D (OXA carbapenemases, such as OXA-23 and OXA-48) (1, 2). Rapid and adequate detection of carbapenemases is very important for appropriate antimicrobial chemotherapies and infection control measures. Various phenotypic confirmation tests for detecting carbapenemases have been performed, including inhibition tests of carbapenemase activity, the modified Hodge test (MHT), and detection of carbapenem hydrolysis (1-8). However, there are no complete assays available to confirm and specify carbapenemases correctly because carbapenemase-producing bacteria, notably Enterobacteriaceae, show variable carbapenem MIC distributions (even under the breakpoint) and sometimes have carbapenemase-independent mechanisms, such as reduced permeability by porin alternations, active efflux pumping, and hyperproduction of class C -lactamases (e.g., AmpC) or extended-spectrum -lactamases (ESBLs) that operate with or without carbapenemase activity (1-4). Moreover, phenotypic assays cannot specify types within each class of carbapenemases, such a...
Introduction: Antigen testing may help screen for and detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections in asymptomatic individuals. However, limited data regarding the diagnostic performance of antigen tests for this group are available. Methods: We used clinical samples to prospectively evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of the antigen test QuickNavi™-COVID19 Ag. This study was conducted at a PCR center between October 7, 2020 and January 9, 2021. Two nasopharyngeal samples per patient were obtained with flocked swabs; one was used for the antigen test, and the other for real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). The diagnostic performance of the antigen test was compared between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, and the RT-PCR results were used as a reference. Results: Among the 1934 collected samples, 188 (9.7%) demonstrated detection of SARS-CoV-2 by real-time RT-PCR; 76 (40.4%) of these 188 samples were from asymptomatic individuals, and over half of the total samples were asymptomatic (1073; 55.5%). The sensitivity of the antigen test was significantly lower for the asymptomatic group than for symptomatic patients (67.1% vs. 89.3%, respectively, p < 0.001). The specificity was 100% for both groups, and no false positives were observed among all 1934 samples. The median cycle threshold value for the asymptomatic group was significantly higher than that of the symptomatic group (24 vs. 20, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The QuickNavi™-COVID19 Ag showed lower sensitivity for the asymptomatic group than for symptomatic patients. However, its specificity was consistently high, and no false positives were found in this study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.