Homophilic binding of E-cadherins through their ectodomains is fundamental to epithelial cell-cell adhesion. Despite this, E-cadherin ectodomains have evolved differently in the vertebrate and insect lineages. Of the five rod-like, tandemly aligned extracellular cadherin domains of vertebrate E-cadherin, the tip extracellular cadherin domain plays a pivotal role in binding interactions. Comparatively, the six consecutive N-terminal extracellular cadherin domains of Drosophila E-cadherin, DE-cadherin (also known as Shotgun), can mediate adhesion; however, the underlying mechanism is unknown. Here, we report atomic force microscopy imaging of DE-cadherin extracellular cadherin domains. We identified a tightly folded globular structure formed by the four N-terminal-most extracellular cadherin domains stabilized by the subsequent two extracellular cadherin domains. Analysis of hybrid cadherins from different insects indicated that the E-cadherin globular portion is associated with determining homophilic binding specificity. The second to fourth extracellular cadherin domains were identified as the minimal portion capable of mediating exclusive homophilic binding specificity. Our findings suggest that the N-terminal-most four extracellular cadherin domains of insect E-cadherin are functionally comparable with the N-terminal-most single extracellular cadherin domain of vertebrate E-cadherin, but that their mechanisms might significantly differ. This work illuminates the divergence of structural strategies for E-cadherin homophilic binding among bilaterians.

Classical cadherins play key roles in cell–cell adhesion. The adhesion process is thought to comprise mainly two steps: X-dimer and strand-swap (SS-) dimer formation of the extracellular domains (ectodomains) of cadherins. The dimerization mechanism of this two-step process has been investigated for type I cadherins, including E-cadherin, of classical cadherins, whereas other binding states also have been proposed, raising the possibility of additional binding processes required for the cadherin dimerization. However, technical limitations in observing single-molecule structures and their dynamics have precluded the investigation of the dynamic binding process of cadherin. Here, we used high-speed atomic force microscopy (HS-AFM) to observe full-length ectodomains of E-cadherin in solution and identified multiple dimeric structures that had not been reported previously. HS-AFM revealed that almost half of the cadherin dimers showed S- (or reverse S-) shaped conformations, which had more dynamic properties than the SS- and X-like dimers. The combined HS-AFM, mutational, and molecular modeling analyses showed that the S-shaped dimer was formed by membrane-distal ectodomains, while the binding interface was different from that of SS- and X-dimers. Furthermore, the formation of the SS-dimer from the S-shaped and X-like dimers was directly visualized, suggesting the processes of SS-dimer formation from S-shaped and X-dimers during cadherin dimerization.

Type III cadherin represents the ancestral form of classical cadherin in bilaterian metazoans. Drosophila possesses type III and type IVa cadherins, known as DN- and DE-cadherins, respectively. Mature DN- and DE-cadherins have 15 and 7 extracellular cadherin domain (EC) repeats, respectively, with DN-cadherin EC6–11 homologous to DE-cadherin EC1–6. These EC repeats contain predicted complete or partial Ca2+-free inter-EC linkers that potentially contribute to adhesion. Comparative structure-function studies of DN- and DE-cadherins may help us understand the ancestral and derived states of classical cadherin-mediated adhesion mechanisms. Here, using bead aggregation assays, we found that DN-cadherin EC1–11 and DE-cadherin EC1–6 exhibit Ca2+-dependent adhesive properties. Using high-speed atomic force microscopy (HS-AFM) imaging in solution, we showed that both DN- and DE-cadherin ectodomains share a common morphological framework consisting of a strand-like and a globule-like portion. Furthermore, the DN-cadherin EC repeats were highly variable, flexible in morphology, and with at least three bendable sites, one of which is located in EC6–11 and can act as a flexible hinge. Our findings provide insights into diversification of classical cadherin-mediated adhesion mechanisms. (180 words or less)