Summarybackground The current World Health Organisation (WHO) classification of dengue includes two distinct entities: dengue fever (DF) and dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF)/dengue shock syndrome; it is largely based on pediatric cases in Southeast Asia. Dengue has extended to different tropical areas and older age groups. Variations from the original description of dengue manifestations are being reported.objectives To analyse the experience of clinicians in using the dengue case classification and identify challenges in applying the criteria in routine clinical practice.method Systematic literature review of post-1975 English-language publications on dengue classification.results Thirty-seven papers were reviewed. Several studies had strictly applied all four WHO criteria in DHF cases; however, most clinicians reported difficulties in meeting all four criteria and used a modified classification. The positive tourniquet test representing the minimum requirement of a haemorrhagic manifestation did not distinguish between DHF and DF. In cases of DHF thrombocytopenia was observed in 8.6-96%, plasma leakage in 6-95% and haemorrhagic manifestations in 22-93%. The low sensitivity of classifying DHF could be due to failure to repeat the tests or physical examinations at the appropriate time, early intravenous fluid therapy, and lack of adequate resources in an epidemic situation and perhaps a considerable overlap of clinical manifestations in the different dengue entities.conclusion A prospective multi-centre study across dengue endemic regions, age groups and the health care system is required which describes the clinical presentation of dengue including simple laboratory parameters in order to review and if necessary modify the current dengue classification.keywords dengue case classification, dengue haemorrhagic fever, plasma leakage, tourniquet test

Delhi was the fourth State in India to conduct mass immunization of children (Pulse Polio Immunization) of the < 3 year age group with Oral Polio Vaccine (OPV) as a strategy towards the eradication of poliomyelitis. This study attempted to evaluate the immunization coverage achieved and the channels of communication which were effective in increasing coverage in three high risk areas of Delhi during October 1994. The overall immunization coverage was 89%. Information sources like enumeration visits, posters, television, radio and schools statistically correlated with the Pulse Polio Immunization (PPI) outcome. However, the cost of enumeration was high. Other less expensive channels of communication appeared to be equally effective. Only 11% of the children surveyed were not immunized with PPI OPV. The major reasons why some children did not receive OPV was that parents were "not informed" or they were "too busy".