Aims To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) readings between Tono-Pen tonometry and GAT, between noncontact tonometry (NCT) and GAT, and between dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). The correlation between IOP reading and possible confounder was identified. Methods This observational cross-sectional study enrolled sixty-two healthy subjects. All IOP and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) measurements were taken by a single ophthalmologist; mean keratometric power (MK), central corneal thickness (CCT), and lens thickness (LT) were measured by a single experienced technician.Results Stepwise multiple regression analysis indicated that GAT (P ¼ 0.017) and DCT (P ¼ 0.002) readings correlated positively with MK; GAT, NCT, and Tono-Pen readings correlated positively with CCT (Po0.05); NCT (P ¼ 0.035), and DCT (P ¼ 0.016) readings correlated negatively with LT; GAT (P ¼ 0.006) and Tono-Pen (P ¼ 0.009) readings correlated positively with OPA. Conclusions The K, CCT, LT, and OPA are confounders in tonometry readings.
Aims or purpose Screening for amblyopia at earliest age is important for early treatment and better prognosis. This study aimed at evaluating the validity of uncorrected distant and near visual acuity and random dot stereopsis for screening amblyopia. Methods In Eastern Taiwan, population-based screen tests were performed for children at age from 3 to 6 years. The tests included uncorrected distant and near visions and random dot stereopsis (300 s) test. The screen performers were registered nurses of local public health service posts. The golden standards of the tests were the results of examination by the ophthalmologists. Results Including Hans and aboriginal Taiwanese, 5232 children were included. Screened by distance visual acuity with different cutoffs and near visual acuity, 10.3, 30.3 and 8.2% children were abnormal. Screened by random dot, only 2% children were abnormal. By a senior ophthalmologist, 115 amblyopic children were diagnosed amblyopic. The sensitivities of distance visual acuity with low/high cutoff and near visual acuity were 74.7/84.8 and 49.4%, whereas that of the NTU random dot stereogram was 20.5%. Simultaneous testing of either two of the three tests improved the sensitivity. Conclusion Screening for amblyopia by the local nurses using the visual acuity tests or random dot stereopsis test alone does not display a high sensitivity. Simultaneous testing of distant visual acuity and stereopsis test elevate the sensitivity and preserve the specificity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.