h The aim of this study was to examine the relationships between N-acetyltransferase genotypes, pharmacokinetics, and tolerability of granular slow-release para-aminosalicylic acid (GSR-PAS) in tuberculosis patients. The study was a randomized, two-period, open-label, crossover design wherein each patient received 4 g GSR-PAS twice daily or 8 g once daily alternately. The PAS concentration-time profiles were modeled by a one-compartment disposition model with three transit compartments in series to describe its absorption. Patients' NAT1 and NAT2 genotypes were determined by sequencing and restriction enzyme analysis, respectively. The number of daily vomits was modeled by a Poisson probability mass function. Comparisons of other tolerability measures by regimens, gender, and genotypes were evaluated by a linear mixed-effects model. The covariate effects associated with efavirenz, gender, and NAT1*3, NAT1*14, and NAT2*5 alleles corresponded to 25, 37, ؊17, ؊48, and ؊27% changes, respectively, in oral clearance of PAS. The NAT1*10 allele did not influence drug clearance. The time above the MIC of 1 mg/liter was significantly different between the two regimens but not influenced by the NAT1 or NAT2 genotypes. The occurrence and intensity of intolerance differed little between regimens. Four grams of GSR-PAS twice daily but not 8 g once daily ensured concentrations exceeding the MIC (1 mg/liter) throughout the dosing interval; PAS intolerance was not related to maximum PAS concentrations over the doses studied and was not more frequent after once-daily dosing. We confirm that the slow phenotype conferred by the NAT1*14 and NAT1*3 alleles resulted in higher PAS exposure but found no evidence of increased activity of the NAT1*10 allele. p ara-Aminosalicylic acid (PAS) was the first effective antituberculosis agent used to treat pulmonary tuberculosis (1); for a duration of 20 to 25 years, it was part of the standard "first-line" tuberculosis treatment (2). Valued for preventing resistance in companion drugs, it was nonetheless notorious for gastrointestinal intolerance, causing frequent nausea, vomiting, and abdominal discomfort. The replacement of PAS with rifampin and ethambutol was greeted with relief by patients, but with widespread multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis in a number of countries, particularly in the developing world, PAS is again being used to treat drug-resistant tuberculosis.The PAS preparation most commonly used in many countries is the granular slow-release (delayed-release) formulation (GSR-PAS), which prevents premature drug release in the stomach, avoiding the high PAS concentrations considered prone to cause intolerance. Several studies (3-7) have reported PAS concentrations associated with use of GSR-PAS in dosages from 4 g daily to 8 to 12 g daily in divided doses, as recommended by the World Health Organization (8). As PAS is usually considered bacteriostatic, divided dosing aims to provide concentrations consistently exceeding the PAS MIC of approx...

dThe emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Mycobacterium tuberculosis prompted the reintroduction of para-aminosalicylic acid (PAS) to protect companion anti-tuberculosis drugs from additional acquired resistance. In sub-Saharan Africa, MDR/XDR tuberculosis with HIV coinfection is common, and concurrent treatment of HIV infection and MDR/XDR tuberculosis is required. Out of necessity, patients receive multiple drugs, and PAS therapy is frequent; however, neither potential drug interactions nor the effects of HIV infection are known. Potential drug-drug interaction with PAS and the effect of HIV infection was examined in 73 pulmonary tuberculosis patients; 22 (30.1%) were HIV coinfected. Fortyone pulmonary MDR or XDR tuberculosis patients received 4 g PAS twice daily, and in a second crossover study, another 32 patients were randomized, receiving 4 g PAS twice daily or 8 g PAS once daily. A PAS population pharmacokinetic model in two dosing regimens was developed; potential covariates affecting its pharmacokinetics were examined, and Monte Carlo simulations were conducted evaluating the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic index. The probability of target attainment (PTA) to maintain PAS levels above MIC during the dosing interval was estimated by simulation of once-, twice-, and thrice-daily dosing regimens not exceeding 12 g daily. Concurrent efavirenz (EFV) medication resulted in a 52% increase in PAS clearance and a corresponding >30% reduction in mean PAS area under the concentration curve in 19 of 22 HIV-M. tuberculosis-coinfected patients. Current practice recommends maintenance of PAS concentrations at >1 g/ml (the MIC of M. tuberculosis), but the model predicts that at only a minimum dose of 4 g twice daily can this PTA be achieved in at least 90% of the population, whether or not EFV is concomitantly administered. Once-daily dosing of 12 g PAS will not provide PAS concentrations exceeding the MIC over the entire dosing interval if coadministered with EFV, while 4 g twice daily ensures concentrations exceeding MIC over the entire dosing interval, even in HIV-infected patients who received EFV.

The aztreonam/avibactam combination protects aztreonam from hydrolysis and provides synergy in antimicrobial activity against multiple β-lactamase-expressing strains with a wide MIC range.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT• There are presently no published data on tramadol transfer into breast milk or on its effects in the breastfed infant. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS• We have provided quantitative data on the absolute and relative infant doses of rac-tramadol and it rac-O-desmethyl metabolite for the breastfed infant.• We have also demonstrated a novel sparse sampling data collection method for investigating infant exposure via milk. AIMSTo investigate the transfer of rac-tramadol and its rac-O-desmethyl metabolite into transitional milk, and assess unwanted effects in the breastfed infant. METHODSTramadol HCl (100 mg six hourly) was administered to 75 breastfeeding mothers for postoperative analgesia on days 2-4 after Caesarian section. Milk and plasma samples were collected after administration of four or more doses. Rac-tramadol and rac-O-desmethyltramadol were measured by high performance liquid chromatography. Milk : plasma ratio (M : P) and infant doses were calculated by standard methods. The behavioural characteristics of the exposed breastfed infants and a matched control group of infants not exposed to tramadol were also studied. RESULTSAt steady-state, mean (95% CI) M : P was 2.2 (2.0, 2.4) for rac-tramadol and 2.8 (2.5, 3.1) for rac-O-desmethyltramadol. The estimated absolute and relative infant doses were 112 (102, 122) mg kg -1 day -1 and 30 (28, 32) mg kg -1 day -1, and 2.24% (2.04, 2.44)% and 0.64% (0.59, 0.69)% for rac-tramadol and rac-O-desmethyltramadol, respectively. The exposed infants and control breastfed infants had similar characteristics, including Apgar scores at birth and Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Scores. CONCLUSIONSThe combined relative infant dose of 2.88% at steady-state was low. The similarity of NACS in exposed infants and controls suggests that there were no significant behavioural adverse effects. We conclude that short-term maternal use of tramadol during establishment of lactation is compatible with breastfeeding.

While neither the attenuated (H37Ra) nor the virulent strain (H37Rv) is a clinical strain, both strains predicted MICs of clinical isolates equally well, when comparing the current in vitro results to clinical susceptibility data in the literature. H37Ra comes with the benefits of lower experimental costs and less administrative barriers including the requirement of a biosafety Level III environment.

Both theories and applications of these approaches provide an overall understanding of how the tools can streamline drug development process and help make crucial decisions. Many opportunities and potentials are presented to incorporate more rigorous integration of PK-PD modeling approaches even at preclinical stage to extrapolate to clinical settings, thus enabling successful trials and optimizing dosing strategies in relevant populations where the drug is mostly used.

No abstract

Fosfomycin is widely used for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI), and it has recently been recommended that fosfomycin be used to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacilli. Whether urine acidification can improve bacterial susceptibility to fosfomycin oral dosing regimens has not been analyzed. The MIC of fosfomycin for 245 Gramnegative bacterial isolates, consisting of 158 Escherichia coli isolates and 87 Klebsiella isolates which were collected from patients with urinary tract infections, were determined at pH 6.0 and 7.0 using the agar dilution method. Monte Carlo simulation of the urinary fosfomycin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) after a single oral dose of 3,000 mg fosfomycin and the MIC distribution were used to determine the probability of target attainment (PTA). Fosfomycin was effective against E. coli (MIC 90 Յ 16 g/ml) but not against Klebsiella spp. (MIC 90 Ͼ 512 g/ml). Acidification of the environment increased the susceptibility of 71% of the bacterial isolates and resulted in a statistically significant decrease in bacterial survival. The use of a regimen consisting of a single oral dose of fosfomycin against an E. coli isolate with an MIC of Յ64 mg/liter was able to achieve a PTA of Ն90% for a target pharmacodynamic index (AUC/MIC) of 23 in urine; PTA was not achieved when the MIC was higher than 64 mg/liter. The cumulative fractions of the bacterial responses (CFR) were 99% and 55% against E. coli and Klebsiella spp., respectively, based on simulated drug exposure in urine with an acidic pH of 6.0. A decrease of the pH from 7.0 to 6.0 improved the PTA and CFR of the target pharmacodynamic index in both E. coli and Klebsiella isolates.KEYWORDS Enterobacteriaceae, fosfomycin, Monte Carlo simulation, acidic pH, pharmacodynamics, urinary tract infection U rinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most common infections worldwide, and members of the family Enterobacteriaceae are the main pathogens responsible for UTIs (1). The rise in the rate of antibiotic resistance over the last several years has resulted in limited treatment options currently available for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. Fosfomycin is an old antibiotic agent frequently used to treat uncomplicated UTIs and has been reevaluated as a potential option for the treatment of infections caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria (2). The dosage currently approved for the treatment of an uncomplicated UTI is a single