Viral safety is a predominant concern for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and other recombinant proteins (RPs) with pharmaceutical applications. Certain commercial purification modules, such as nanofiltration and low-pH inactivation, have been observed to reliably clear greater than 4 log(10) of large enveloped viruses, including endogenous retrovirus. The concept of "bracketed generic clearance" has been proposed for these steps if it could be prospectively demonstrated that viral log(10) reduction value (LRV) is not impacted by operating parameters that can vary, within a reasonable range, between commercial processes. In the case of low-pH inactivation, a common step in mAb purification processes employed after protein A affinity chromatography, these parameters would include pH, time and temperature of incubation, the content of salts, protein concentration, aggregates, impurities, model protein pI, and buffer composition. In this report, we define bracketed generic clearance conditions, using a prospectively defined bracket/matrix approach, where low-pH inactivation consistently achieves >or=4.6 log(10) clearance of xenotropic murine leukemia virus (X-MLV), a model for rodent endogenous retrovirus. The mechanism of retrovirus inactivation by low-pH treatment was also investigated.

Chinese hamster ovary cells used for pharmaceutical protein production express noninfectious retrovirus-like particles. To assure the safety of pharmaceutical proteins, validation of the ability of manufacturing processes to clear retrovirus-like particles is required for product registration. Xenotropic murine leukemia virus (X-MuLV) is often used as a model virus for clearance studies. Traditionally, cell-based infectivity assay has been the standard virus quantification method. In this article, a real time quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) method has been developed for X-MuLV detection/quantification. This method provides accurate and reproducible quantification of X-MuLV particle RNA (pRNA) over a linear dynamic range of at least 100,000-fold with a quantification limit of approximately 1.5 pRNA copies microL(-1). It is about 100-fold more sensitive than the cell-based infectivity assay. High concentrations of protein and cellular DNA present in test samples have been demonstrated to have no impact on X-MuLV quantification. The X-MuLV clearance during chromatography and filtration procedures determined by this method is highly comparable with that determined by the cell-based infectivity assay. X-MuLV clearance measured by both methods showed that anion exchange chromatography (QSFF) and DV50 viral filtration are robust retroviral removal steps. In addition, combination of the two methods was able to distinguish the viral removal from inactivation by the Protein A chromatography, and fully recognize the viral clearance capacity of this step. This new method offers significant advantages over cell-based infectivity assays. It could be used to substitute cell-based infectivity assays for process validation of viral removal procedures, but not inactivation steps. Its availability should greatly facilitate and reduce the cost of viral clearance evaluations for new biologic product development.

No abstract