Background and Aim Tumor genotyping may allow for improved prognostication and targeted therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We aimed to compare endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with fine needle aspiration (FNA) to fine needle biopsy (FNB) for obtaining sufficient tissue for genomic analysis and theranostic potential. Methods A retrospective cohort study of patients that underwent EUS‐FNA or EUS‐FNB with either positive or suspicious cytology for PDAC between March 2016 and December 2017. Demographic, procedural, and cytology data were recorded. Genetic alterations were recorded, and Kaplan–Meier survival curves were calculated. Results The study included 167 patients: 145 patients had FNA and 22 patients underwent FNB. Overall, 117 samples (70.1%) were sufficient for targeted next‐generation sequencing. FNB resulted in a higher proportion of patients with sufficient samples compared with FNA (90.9% vs 66.9%; P = 0.02). In multivariable modeling, only FNB (odds ratio 4.95, 95% confidence interval 1.11–22.05, P = 0.04) was associated with sufficient sampling for genomic testing. FNB was more likely to obtain sufficient tissue from tumors ≤ 3 cm (100% vs 68.4%, P = 0.017) and tumors located in the head/neck of the pancreas (100% vs 63.1%, P = 0.03) compared with FNA. The most commonly identified alterations were in KRAS (88%), TP53 (68%), and SMAD4 (16%). Conclusions Endoscopic ultrasonography can reliably obtain sufficient tissue from PDAC for targeted genomic sequencing for prognostication and theranostics. FNB should be considered when tumor genotyping is requested, especially for tumors ≤ 3 cm or tumors located in the head/neck of the pancreas.

Coronaviruses have caused three global outbreaks in the last 20 years, which include Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) caused by SARS-CoV (SARS-CoV-1), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) by MERS-CoV and Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) due to SARS-CoV-2. These outbreaks share many similarities, including clinical presentation, transmission, and management. Although respiratory manifestations are responsible for most of the morbidity and mortality in these conditions, extra-pulmonary manifestations such as gastrointestinal symptoms are also increasingly recognized as important symptoms. Important gastrointestinal symptoms include nausea, vomiting, anorexia, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. Hepatic manifestations such as abnormal aminotransferases are also noted in these patients. Early identification of GI symptoms is crucial as some patients can present only with GI manifestations in the absence of pulmonary symptoms. Furthermore, patients with diarrhea have tested positive for viral RNA in the stool. This has been reported even after the resolution of respiratory symptoms and can extend up to many days from the onset of symptoms. Because of this phenomenon, there is a theoretical risk of fecal-oral transmission and the potential spread of the disease. Though GI symptoms are frequently observed, understanding the pathogenesis of these symptoms is crucial, as it can not only of public health importance but could also identify infected patients early in the spread. Understanding the different GI and hepatic manifestations with underlying mechanisms of symptoms can assist in the therapeutic management of these patients. In this article, we summarize various GI and hepatic manifestations with their prevalence, underlying pathophysiology with emphasis on stool positivity.

Jackhammer Esophagus, an extreme manometric phenotype, was identified in 4.0% of patients referred to a University Motility Center. The patients with these esophageal hypercontractility states present mainly with dysphagia. A subgroup of Jackhammer did have accompanying incomplete LES relaxation and responded to targeted therapy with pneumatic dilatation.

In gastroparetic patients, ICC loss in the pylorus is twice as common as in the antrum and fibrosis in the pyloric smooth muscle is nearly three times more common than the antrum. These findings can provide one explanation for pyloric dysfunction which is a contributing factor to the pathophysiology of gastroparesis.

Gastric hyperplastic polyps were significantly associated with positive H. pylori status and portal hypertensive gastropathy as compared with fundic gland polyps.

No abstract

Background Many of the studies on COVID‐19 severity and its associated symptoms focus on hospitalized patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between acute GI symptoms and COVID‐19 severity in a clustering‐based approach and to determine the risks and epidemiological features of post‐COVID‐19 Disorders of Gut–Brain Interaction (DGBI) by including both hospitalized and ambulatory patients. Methods The study utilized a two‐phase Internet‐based survey on: (1) COVID‐19 patients’ demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, complications, and hospitalizations and (2) post‐COVID‐19 DGBI diagnosed according to Rome IV criteria in association with anxiety (GAD‐7) and depression (PHQ‐9). Statistical analyses included univariate and multivariate tests. Results Five distinct clusters of symptomatic subjects were identified based on the presence of GI symptoms, loss of smell, and chest pain, among 1114 participants who tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2. GI symptoms were found to be independent risk factors for severe COVID‐19; however, they did not always coincide with other severity‐related factors such as age >65 years, diabetes mellitus, and Vitamin D deficiency. Of the 164 subjects with a positive test who participated in Phase‐2, 108 (66%) fulfilled the criteria for at least one DGBI. The majority ( n = 81; 75%) were new‐onset DGBI post‐COVID‐19. Overall, 86% of subjects with one or more post‐COVID‐19 DGBI had at least one GI symptom during the acute phase of COVID‐19, while 14% did not. Depression (65%), but not anxiety (48%), was significantly more common in those with post‐COVID‐19 DGBI. Conclusion GI symptoms are associated with a severe COVID‐19 among survivors. Long‐haulers may develop post‐COVID‐19 DGBI. Psychiatric disorders are common in post‐COVID‐19 DGBI.

Background/Aims: Endoscopic intervention for pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS) has been associated with failures and increased need for additional endoscopic and non-endoscopic interventions. The primary aim of this study is to determine outcomes of EUS-guided transmural drainage of PFCs in patients with DPDS. Methods: In patients undergoing EUS-guided drainage of PFCs from 1/2013 to 1/2018, demographic profiles, procedural indications and details, adverse events, outcomes, and subsequent interventions were retrospectively collected. Overall treatment success was determined by PFC resolution on follow-up imaging or stent removal without recurrence. Results: EUS-guided drainage of PFCs was performed in 141 patients. DPDS was present in 57 (40%) and walled-off necrosis was the most frequent PFC (55%). DPDS was not associated with lower clinical success, increased number of repeat interventions, or time to PFC resolution. Patients with DPDS were more likely to be treated with permanent transmural plastic double pigtail stents (OR 6.4; 95% CI [2.5-16.5], P<0.001). However, when stents were removed, DPDS was associated with increased PFC recurrence after stent removal (OR 8.0; 95% CI [1.2-381.8], P=0.040). Conclusions: DPDS frequently occurs in patients with PFCs but does not negatively impact successful resolution. DPDS is associated with increased PFC recurrence after stent removal.