This study examines the clinical, functional and radiological outcomes of distal radius fracture fixation with the Aptus® (Medartis, Pennsylvania) locking plate in order to determine its efficacy and identify notable findings related to treatment variations. MethodsThis is a retrospective bi-centre study collecting patient details from a district general hospital and a regional hand unit. We assessed 61 consecutive patients with distal radius fractures (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) grade A=19, B=9, C=33) fixed using an Aptus® plate with a minimum of six months follow-up. Outcome measures included the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score, wrist range of movement and grip strength, and complications. Radiographs were reviewed to assess restoration of anatomy and union. ResultsAll but two fractures united within six weeks. The mean ranges of movement were only mildly restricted compared to the normal wrist (flexion/extension = 102°; radial/ulna deviation = 53°; pronation/supination = 169°). Mean postoperative grip strength was 23.8 kg, which was comparable to the contralateral side at 31.5 kg. The mean DASH score was 18.2. Seven patients had screws misplaced outside the distal radius although three of these remained asymptomatic. ConclusionVariable-angle locking systems benefit from the flexibility of implant positioning and may allow enhanced inter-fragmentary reduction for accurate fixation of intra-articular fractures.
Operative intervention with a volar locking plate (VLP) is currently the gold standard for the fixation of distal radius fractures. Intramedullary nailing (IMN) of the distal radius is a novel technique that aims to reduce soft tissue complications due to a smaller surgical incision while maintaining the benefits of a rigid fracture fixation. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the functional, clinical, and radiological outcomes of all published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing patient outcomes of VLP and IMN in distal radius fracture fixation. Three databases (Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library) were searched in July 2021. The inclusion criteria were RCTs comparing fixation of extra-articular or simple intra-articular distal radius with VLP or IMN and availability of full text in English. Children under the age of 18 were excluded. Seven trials with a total of 398 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that there were improved short-term clinical outcomes favouring IMN, although there were no significant differences in terms of functional, radiological, and long-term clinical outcomes. Analysis showed that outcomes of IMN are comparable with VLP for fixation of extra-articular and simple intra-articular distal radius fractures. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size. We recommend that further high-quality trials are required to establish the role of IMN in distal radius fixation.
Introduction Poor handover between shifts can result in patient harm. This study was designed to evaluate the impact of implementing a handover protocol on the quality of information exchanged in the trauma handover meetings in a UK hospital. Method A prospective single-centre observational study was performed at an NHS Trust. Ten consecutive weekday trauma meetings, involving 43 patients, were observed to identify poor practices in handover. This data was used in conjunction with the Royal College of Surgeons’ recommendations for effective handover (2007) to create and implement a standard operating protocol (SOP). Following its implementation, a further 8 consecutive meetings, involving a further 47 patients, were observed. The data was analysed using t-test for quantitative variables and chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables. Results An improvement was demonstrated in multiple aspects of trauma handover including past medical history, injury date, results, diagnosis, consent, mark, and starvation status (all p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that handover of neck-of-femur fracture patients including information on baseline mobility (p = 0.04), Nottingham-Hip-Fracture Score (p = 0.01), next-of-kin discussion (p = 0.075) and resuscitation status (p = 0.001) all improved following the intervention. Conclusions These results demonstrate that the implementation of a well-structured handover protocol can improve the transmission of critical information in trauma meetings.
Introduction In an orthopaedic department, majority of plans and decision-making cases occur at the daily trauma meeting. With the advent of COVID-19 pandemic, it was challenging to deliver the standard care maintaining social distancing guidelines. Therefore, virtual trauma handover replaced the traditional face-to-face handover as a standalone solution. This study has tried to report on effectivity of the new virtual trauma handover process. Method This single centre observational study compared retrospectively collected data during pre-COVID-19 period (2019) and prospectively followed data from virtual trauma meetings during COVID 19 pandemic. The study analysed comparison of meeting start and finish time, attendance of key members, punctuality of attendees and interruptions during the handover process. Results Changing from face-to-face to virtual trauma meetings, average participation doubled from 9 to 18 with increased consultant attendance (Mean: 7.5 vs 2) -statistically significant (p < 0.05). Enhanced senior clinician participation helped in multidisciplinary decision making promptly. Punctuality of attendance noted as declining late arrivals in 28/34 face-to-face to 4/34 virtual meetings. Although meetings start-time remained similar overall, there was less interruptions during virtual handover and mean meeting span reduced by 13 minutes. Conclusions As part of adaptive changes during COVID-19 pandemic, virtual trauma handover meetings have introduced changes in delivery of existing acute trauma services. Within very few limitations, it could be an aid to improve clinician participation, easiness of having multidisciplinary opinion and decision making. Moreover, it helped to practice social distancing guidelines. Educational activities are also effectively managed through virtual meetings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.