Purpose Only 34% of breast cancer survivors engage in the recommended level of physical activity because of a lack of accountability and motivation. Methodist Hospital Cancer Health Application (MOCHA) is a smartphone tool created specifically for self-reinforcement for patients with cancer through the daily accounting of activity and nutrition and direct interaction with clinical dietitians. We hypothesize that use of MOCHA will improve the accountability of breast cancer survivors and help them reach their personalized goals. Patients and Methods Women with stages I to III breast cancer who were at least 6 months post–active treatment with a body mass index (BMI) greater than 25 kg/m2 were enrolled in a 4-week feasibility trial. The primary objective was to demonstrate adherence during weeks 2 and 3 of the 4-week study period (14 days total). The secondary objective was to determine the usability of MOCHA according to the system usability scale. The exploratory objective was to determine weight loss and dietitian-participant interaction. Results We enrolled 33 breast cancer survivors who had an average BMI of 31.6 kg/m2. Twenty-five survivors completed the study, and the average number of daily uses was approximately 3.5 (range, 0 to 12) times/day; participants lost an average of 2 lbs (+4 lbs to −10.6 lbs). The average score of usability (the second objective) was 77.4, which was greater than the acceptable level. More than 90% of patients found MOCHA easy to navigate, and 84% were motivated to use MOCHA daily. Conclusion This study emphasizes the importance of technology use to improve goal adherence for patients by providing real-time feedback and accountability with the health care team. MOCHA focuses on the engagement of the health care team and is integrated into clinical workflow. Future directions will use MOCHA in a long-term behavior modification study.

The twin pressures of cost containment in the healthcare market and new federal regulations and policies have led to the prioritization of the meaningful use of electronic health records in the United States. EDW and SIA layers on top of EDW are becoming an essential strategic tool to healthcare institutions and integrated delivery networks in order to support evidence-based medicine at the enterprise level.

No abstract

Background We present data on a cohort of patients diagnosed with sepsis over a 10‐year period comparing outcomes in solid organ transplant (SOT) and non–solid organ transplant (non–SOT) recipients. Methods This is a retrospective single‐center study of patients with diagnosis of sepsis from 1/1/06 to 6/30/16. Cases and controls were matched by year of sepsis diagnosis with propensity score matching. Conditional logistic regression and repeated measurement models were performed for binary outcomes. Trends over time for in‐hospital mortality were determined using the Cochran‐Armitage test. A gamma‐distributed model was performed on the continuous variables. Results Overall, there were 18 632 admission encounters with a discharge diagnosis of sepsis in 14 780 unique patients. Of those admissions, 1689 were SOT recipients. After 1:1 matching by year, there were three thousand three hundred and forty patients (1670 cases; 1670 controls) diagnosed with sepsis. There was a decreasing trend for in‐hospital mortality for sepsis over time in SOT patients and non–SOT patients (P < .05) due to early sepsis recognition and improved standard of care. Despite higher comorbidities in the SOT group, conditional logistic regression showed that in‐hospital mortality for sepsis in SOT patients was similar compared with non–SOT patients (odds ratio [OR] =1.14 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.95‐1.37], P = .161). However, heart and lung SOT subgroups had higher odds of dying compared with the non–SOT group (OR = 1.83 [95% CI, 1.30‐2.57], P < .001 and OR = 1.77 [95% CI, 1.34‐2.34], P < .001). On average, SOT patients had 2 days longer hospital length of stay compared with non–SOT admissions (17.00 ± 19.54 vs 15.23 ± 17.07, P < .05). Additionally, SOT patients had higher odds of hospital readmission within 30 days (OR = 1.25 [95% CI, 1.06‐1.51], P = .020), and higher odds for DIC compared with non–SOT patients (OR = 1.76 [95% CI, 1.10‐2.86], P = .021). Conclusion Sepsis in solid organ transplants and non–solid organ transplant patients have similar mortality; however, the subset of heart and lung transplant recipients with sepsis has a higher rate of mortality compared with the non–solid organ transplant recipients. SOT with sepsis as a group has a higher hospital readmission rate compared with non–transplant sepsis patients.