Background: There is limited data on feasibility and safety of coronary interventions performed using radial artery at anatomical snuffbox as vascular access point in South Asian region. Our study attempts to evaluate the feasibility and safety of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention using transradial access at anatomical snuffbox.Methods: Transradial access at anatomical snuffbox was attempted in 128 consecutive patients, who were planned for coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention. Success in vascular access, completion of planned procedure and complications encountered, including patency of radial artery after the procedure, were investigated. Results: A total of 128 patients (76 males [59.4%]; 52 females [40.6%]) between 44-78 years of age (mean age, 59.0 +/- 10.2 years) were included in the study. Distal radial artery puncture and sheath placement was successful in all patients however planned procedure was completed in 126 (98.4%) patients. Total 90 coronary angiographies and 36 percutaneous coronary interventions were performed of which five were primary percutaneous coronary intervention. We encountered brachial artery spasm among two patient (1.5%) and significant pain and swelling among three patients (2.3%). No bleeding complication, numbness or parasthesia were observed on follow-up. Patients had average pain rating of 2.4+/- 1.1 in visual analogue pain rating scale. There were no instances of radial artery occlusion after the procedure.Conclusions: Distal radial artery, at anatomical snuffbox, is a safe and feasible alternative vascular access site for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. Keywords: Cardiac catheter; coronary angiography; feasibility studies; percutaneous coronary intervention; radial artery; vascular access device
Background and Aims: Heart Failure (HF) with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) is defined as the clinical diagnosis of HF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%, also referred to as systolic HF. Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) has shown to reduce mortality for HFrEF. We aim to evaluate adherence to GDMT treatment in our outpatients. Methods: It was a cross-sectional observational study. All patients who attended the Department of preventive medicine and cardiac rehabilitation for medical counseling from October 2016 to May 2018 and have already completed 3 months of follow up for HF were included in this study. Performa was designed to collect patient information which included; age, gender, NYHA functional class, LVEF, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, creatinine, potassium and drugs with doses were recorded. Results: Among the 451 patients, ninety-nine (65.6%) were male and 52 (34.4%) were female. The mean age was 56.2±4.2 years. Most of the patients were in NYHA class II 114 (75.5%) and in Sinus rhythm 119 (79.4%). Mean LVEF was 26.6±6.1%. Dilated Cardiomyopathy was the most common clinical diagnosis in 76 (50.3%). Diuretic, Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/Angitensin receptor blocker (AB), Aldosterone Antagonist, β-blocker and digoxin were prescribed in 151 (100%), 140 (93.3%), 127 (84.1%), 114 (75.4%) and 46 (30.4%) patients respectively. The mean dose of furosemide, Enalapril, Losartan, carvedilol, bisoprolol and metoprolol succinate was 45.3mg, 4.0mg, 33.2mg, 33.6mg, 18.8mg, 3.0mg, and 27.5mg was respectively. Conclusion: Our center's adherence to GDMT in HFrEF patients is comparable to international studies. We still need more effort to re-emphasize the importance of GDMT by focusing on the optimization of drug doses during out-patient visits.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.