A study was conducted to determine how accurately college students can estimate their height and body weight. Four hundred and sixty-nine students (136 females and 333 males) completed a short questionnaire eliciting self-estimates of height and weight, frequency and recency of measuring them, age, and gender. Immediately afterwards, their height and weight were measured. Three hundred and forty-nine subjects were told that they would be measured later; the others were not told that they would be measured. Analysis of the data revealed relatively small absolute errors of estimation (1.00-3.54%); both males and females overestimated height and underestimated weight; females estimated weight less accurately and height more accurately than males; and knowing that one's estimation would be checked by measurement produced slightly more accurate estimations. Simple selfestimates of height and weight are accurate enough to be used in place of measurements.

No abstract

An anthropometric study of a convenience sample of 51 female and 50 male adults of Bangladeshi origin (mean age 41.3 years), living in the United States, but who spent most of their lives in Bangladesh, was conducted. Standard measurements were taken on 24 dimensions of the right hand that were relevant to the design of hand tools, gloves and access spaces using a standard sliding calliper. Analysis of the results showed significant differences in palm and finger segment lengths, breadths and depths between genders in Bangladeshis and also within each gender between Bangladeshis and other populations. The differences between Bangladeshis and other populations were of about the same magnitude as the differences between genders in Bangladeshis. The data gathered may be used for the design of hand tools, gloves, machine access spaces and hand-held devices and for selection of hand tools for use by Bangladeshis. The study also allows inter-population comparisons that can enhance the understanding of hand anthropometry.

This study explores empirical relationships among different types of pinches in three age groups. Peak maximum voluntary forces of several pinches--lateral, chuck, and pulp pinches with digits 2, 3, 4, and 5-were tested in 182 subjects comprising 62 children (5-12 years), 70 adults (18-40 years), and 50 elderly (60-89 years). Analysis of the forces indicated four groups of strength magnitude: (1) lateral and chuck, (2) pulp 2 and 3, (3) pulp 4, and (4) pulp 5, in that order; the strength of each type of pinch bears a definite quantitative relationship to every other type, regardless of age group or gender. The female-to-male strength ratio was greatest in children (89%) and least in adults (69%). Comparison with other pinch strength studies established that although force magnitudes may be strongly influenced by specific experimental conditions, empirical relationships among different pinch forces are fairly stable and predictable.

No abstract