Background: COVID-19 pandemic has strained human and material resources around the world. Practices in surgical oncology had to change in response to these resource limitations, triaging based on acuity, expected oncologic outcomes, availability of supportive resources, and safety of health care personnel.Methods: The MD Anderson Head and Neck Surgery Treatment Guidelines Consortium devised the following to provide guidance on triaging head and neck cancer (HNC) surgeries based on multidisciplinary consensus. HNC subsites considered included aerodigestive tract mucosa, sinonasal, salivary, endocrine, cutaneous, and ocular.Recommendations: Each subsite is presented separately with diseasespecific recommendations. Options for alternative treatment modalities are provided if surgical treatment needs to be deferred. Conclusion: These guidelines are intended to help clinicians caring for patients with HNC appropriately allocate resources during a health care crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. We continue to advocate for individual consideration of cases in a multidisciplinary fashion based on individual patient circumstances and resource availability. K E Y W O R D S oncology, otolaryngology, SARS-CoV-2

Background: To improve care for nonintubated blunt chest wall injury patients, our Level I trauma center developed a treatment protocol and a pulmonary evaluation tool named “PIC Protocol” and “PIC Score,” emphasizing continual assessment of pain, incentive spirometry, and cough ability. Objective: The primary objective was to reduce unplanned intensive care unit admissions for blunt chest wall injury patients using the PIC Protocol and the PIC Score. Additional outcomes included intensive care unit length of stay, ventilator days, length of hospital stay, inhospital mortality, and discharge destination. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes of rib fracture patients treated at our facility 2 years prior to (control group) and 2 years following PIC Protocol use (PIC group). The protocol included admission screening, a power plan order set, the PIC Score patient assessment tool, in-room communication board, and patient education brochure. Outcomes were compared using independent-samples t tests for continuous variables and Pearson's χ2 for categorical variables with α set to p < .05. Results: There were 1,036 patients in the study (control = 501; PIC = 535). Demographics and injury severity were similar between groups. Unanticipated escalations of care for acute pulmonary distress were reduced from 3% (15/501) in the control group to 0.37% (2/535) in the PIC group and were predicted by a preceding fall in the PIC Score of 3 points over the previous 8-hr shift, marking pulmonary decline by an acutely falling PIC Score. Conclusions: The PIC Protocol and the PIC Score are easy-to-use, cost-effective tools for guiding care of blunt chest wall injury patients.

No abstract

No abstract

As U.S. trauma surgery evolves to embrace the concept and practice of acute care surgery, the organization and management structure of the intensive care unit must also grow to reflect new challenges and imperatives faced by trauma surgeons. Key issues to be explored in light of acute care surgery include the role of the traumatologist/intensivist in the intensive care unit, as opposed to the traumatologist without specific critical care training, and a potentially expanded role for nonsurgical intensivists as the critical care time available for trauma/intensivists wanes due to increased surgical and non-critical care patient volume. Each of these changes to the practice of trauma/surgical critical care and acute care surgery are evaluated in light of the primacy of appropriately trained intensivists in the critical care unit. The ethics of providing the best care possible is interrogated in light of different service models in both the university and community settings. The roles of residents, fellows, and midlevel practitioners in supporting the goal of the intensivist and the critical care team is similarly explored. A recommendation for an ethical organizational and management structure is presented.