The magnitude of the acute BP-lowering with exercise may predict the extent of BP lowering after chronic training interventions in prehypertensive individuals.

Equicaloric bouts of interval (IE: 5 × 2:2 min at 85% and 40% maximal oxygen uptake) and steady state (SS: 21 min at 60% maximal oxygen uptake) exercise were performed by 13 older prehypertensive males on separate days, at equivalent times of day, to assess the influence of exercise mode on postexercise hypotension (PEH). Exercise conditions were compared with a control session. Cardiovascular measures were collected for 30 min prior to, and 60 min following exercise. PEH, as measured by mean postexercise systolic blood pressure (SBP) decrease (IE: -4 ± 6 mm Hg; SS: -3 ± 4 mm Hg; control: 4 ± 4 mm Hg), area under the SBP curve (IE: -240 ± 353 mm Hg·min; SS: -192 ± 244 mm Hg·min), and minimum SBP achieved (IE: -15 ± 7 mm Hg; SS: -13 ± 7 mm Hg), was equivalent after both conditions. Stroke volume was significantly reduced (IE: -14.6 ± 16.0 mL; SS: -10.1 ± 14.2 mL, control -1.7 ± 2.2 mL) and heart rate was significantly elevated (IE: 13 ± 8 beats·min⁻¹; SS: 7.9 ± 8 beats·min⁻¹; control: -2 ± 3 beats·min⁻¹) postexercise after both conditions. Cardiac output and total peripheral resistance were nonsignificantly decreased and increased postexercise, respectively. Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) was reduced following IE (p < 0.05) and heart rate variability (HRV) parameters were reduced after both conditions, with IE eliciting larger and longer reductions in some indices. The results from the current study indicate that older prehypertensive adults experience similar PEH following equicaloric bouts of IE and SS exercise despite larger alterations in HRV and BRS elicited by IE.

Patient's values and preferences regarding the relative importance of preventing strokes and avoiding bleeding are now recognised to be of great importance in deciding on therapy for the prevention of stroke due to atrial fibrillation (SPAF). We used an iPad questionnaire to determine the minimal clinically important difference (Treatment Threshold) and the maximum number of major bleeding events that a patient would be willing to endure in order to prevent one stroke (Bleeding Ratio) for the initiation of antithrombotic therapy in 172 hospital in-patients with documented non-valvular atrial fibrillation in whom anticoagulant therapy was being considered. Patients expressed strong opinions regarding SPAF. We found that 12% of patients were "medication averse" and were not willing to consider antithrombotic therapy; even if it was 100% effective in preventing strokes. Of those patients who were willing to consider antithrombotic therapy, 42% were identified as "risk averse" and 15% were "risk tolerant". Patients required at least a 0.8% (NNT=125) annual absolute risk reduction and 15% relative risk reduction in the risk of stroke in order to agree to initiate antithrombotic therapy, and patients were willing to endure 4.4 major bleeds in order to prevent one stroke. In conclusion, there was a substantial amount of inter-patient variability, and often extreme differences in opinion regarding tolerance of bleeding risk in the context of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. These findings highlight the importance of considering patient preferences when deciding on SPAF therapy.

Patients in the LCF programme achieved equivalent results to those in the HCF programme. Certain subgroups of patients, however, may benefit from participation in a HCF programme, including those patients who are predisposed to prematurely discontinuing the programme and those patients who would benefit from increased monitoring. The LCF model can be employed as an alternative option to widen access and participation for patients who are unable to attend HCF programmes due to distance or time limitations.

No abstract