Introduction Meningiomas are generally considered “benign,” however, these tumors can demonstrate variability in behavior and a surprising aggressiveness with elevated rates of recurrence. The advancement of next-generation molecular technologies have led to the understanding of the genomic and epigenomic landscape of meningiomas and more recent correlations with clinical characteristics and behavior. Methods Based on a thorough review of recent peer-reviewed publications (PubMed) and edited texts, we provide a molecular overview of meningiomas with a focus on relevant clinical implications. Results The identification of specific somatic driver mutations has led to the classification of several major genomic subgroups, which account for more than 80% of sporadic meningiomas, and can be distinguished using noninvasive clinical variables to help guide management decisions. Other somatic genomic modifications, including non-coding alterations and copy number variations, have also been correlated with tumor characteristics. Furthermore, epigenomic modifications in meningiomas have recently been described, with DNA methylation being the most widely studied and potentially most clinically relevant. Based on these molecular insights, several clinical trials are currently underway in an effort to establish effective medical therapeutic options for meningioma. Conclusion As we enhance our multiomic understanding of meningiomas, our ability to care for patients with these tumors will continue to improve. Further biological insights will lead to additional progress in precision medicine for meningiomas.
Objective While adjuvant treatment regimens have been modified for older patients with glioblastoma (GBM), surgical strategies have not been tailored. Methods Clinical data of 48 consecutive patients aged 70 years or older, who underwent surgical resection for GBM with intraoperative ultrasonography (IoUS) alone or combination with intraoperative MRI (IoMRI) at Yale New Haven Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Variables were analyzed, and comparative analyses were performed. Results The addition of IoMRI was not superior to IoUS alone in terms of overall survival (OS) (P = 0.306), Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) at postoperative 6 weeks (P = 0.704) or extent of resection (P = 0.263). Length of surgery (LOSx), however, was significantly longer (P = 0.0002) in the IoMRI group. LOSx (P = 0.015) and hospital stay (P = 0.025) were predictors of postoperative complications. Increased EOR (GTR or NTR) (P = 0.030), postoperative adjuvant treatment (P < 0.0001) and postoperative complications (P = 0.006) were predictive for OS. Patients with relatively lower preoperative KPS scores (<70) showed significant improvement at postoperative 6 weeks (P<0.0001). Patients with complications (P = 0.038) were more likely to have lower KPS at postoperative 6 weeks. Conclusions Aggressive management with surgical resection should be considered in older patients with GBM, even those with relatively poor KPS. The use of ioMRI in this population does not appear to confer any measurable benefit over ioUS in experienced hands, but prolongs the length of surgery significantly, which is a preventable prognostic factor for impeding care.
Meningiomas are the most common central nervous system tumors. Although these tumors are extra-axial, a relatively high proportion (10%–50%) of meningioma patients have seizures that can substantially impact the quality of life. Meningiomas are believed to cause seizures by inducing cortical hyperexcitability that results from mass effect and cortical irritation, brain invasion, or peritumoral brain edema. In general, meningiomas that are associated with seizures have aggressive features, with risk factors including atypical histology, brain invasion, and higher tumor grade. Somatic NF2 mutated meningiomas are associated with preoperative seizures, but the effect of the driver mutation is mediated through atypical features. While surgical resection is effective in controlling seizures in most patients with meningioma-related epilepsy, a history of seizures and uncontrolled seizures prior to surgery is the most significant predisposing factor for persistent postoperative seizures. Subtotal resection (STR) and relatively larger residual tumor volume are positive predictors of postoperative seizures. Other factors, including higher WHO grade, peritumoral brain edema, and brain invasion, are inconsistently associated with postoperative seizures, suggesting they might be crucial in the development of an epileptogenic focus, but do not appear to play a substantial role after seizure activity has been established. Herein, we review and summarize the current literature surrounding meningioma-related epilepsy and underscore the interaction of multiple factors that relate to seizures in patients with meningioma.
Background Multiple meningiomas (MMs) rarely occur sporadically. It is unclear whether each individual tumor in a single patient behaves similarly. Moreover, the molecular mechanisms underlying the formation of sporadic MMs and clonal formation etiology of these tumors are poorly understood. Methods Patients with spatially separated MMs without prior radiation exposure or a family history who underwent surgical resection of at least two meningiomas were included. Unbiased, comprehensive next generation sequencing was performed, and relevant clinical data was analyzed. Results Fifteen meningiomas and one dural specimen from six patients were included. The majority of tumors (12/15) were WHO Grade I; one patient had bilateral MMs, one of which was Grade II, while the other was Grade I. We found 11/15 of our cohort specimens were of NF2-loss subtype. Meningiomas from 5/6 patients had a monoclonal origin, with the tumor from the remaining patient showing evidence for independent clonal formation. We identified a novel case of non-NF2 mutant MM with monoclonal etiology. MMs due to a monoclonal origin did not always display a homogenous genomic profile, but rather exhibited heterogeneity due to branching evolution. Conclusions Both NF2-loss and non-NF2 driven MMs can form due to monoclonal expansion and those tumors can acquire inter-tumoral heterogeneity through branched evolution. Grade I and II meningiomas can occur in the same patient. Thus, the molecular make-up and clinical behavior of one tumor in MMs, cannot reliably lend insight into that of the others and suggests the clinical management strategy for MMs should be tailored individually.
OBJECTIVE Mutations in NF2 are the most common somatic driver mutation in sporadic meningiomas. NF2 mutant meningiomas preferentially arise along the cerebral convexities—however, they can also be found in the posterior fossa. The authors investigated whether NF2 mutant meningiomas differ in clinical and genomic features based on their location relative to the tentorium. METHODS Clinical and whole exome sequencing (WES) data for patients who underwent resection of sporadic NF2 mutant meningiomas were reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS A total of 191 NF2 mutant meningiomas were included (165 supratentorial, 26 infratentorial). Supratentorial NF2 mutant meningiomas were significantly associated with edema (64.0% vs 28.0%, p < 0.001); higher grade—i.e., WHO grade II or III (41.8% vs 3.9%, p < 0.001); elevated Ki-67 (55.0% vs 13.6%, p < 0.001); and larger volume (mean 45.5 cm3 vs 14.9 cm3, p < 0.001). Furthermore, supratentorial tumors were more likely to harbor the higher-risk feature of chromosome 1p deletion (p = 0.038) and had a larger fraction of the genome altered with loss of heterozygosity (p < 0.001). Infratentorial meningiomas were more likely to undergo subtotal resection than supratentorial tumors (37.5% vs 15.8%, p = 0.021); however, there was no significant difference in overall (p = 0.2) or progression-free (p = 0.4) survival. CONCLUSIONS Supratentorial NF2 mutant meningiomas are associated with more aggressive clinical and genomic features as compared with their infratentorial counterparts. Although infratentorial tumors have higher rates of subtotal resection, there is no associated difference in survival or recurrence. These findings help to better inform surgical decision-making in the management of NF2 mutant meningiomas based on location, and may guide postoperative management of these tumors.
OBJECTIVE As sphenoid wing meningiomas (SWMs) are associated with varying degrees of bony involvement, we sought to understand potential relationships between genomic subgroup and this feature. METHODS Patients treated at Yale-New Haven Hospital for SWM were reviewed. Genomic subgroup was determined via whole exome sequencing, while the extent of bony involvement was radiographically classified as frank tumor invasion (TI), hyperostosis only (HOOs), or both (TI+HO). Among additional clinical variables collected, a subset of tumors was identified as spheno-orbital meningiomas (SOMs). Predictive logistic regression models were developed for genomic subgroups based on pre-operative clinical features. RESULTS Among 64 SWMs, 53% had HOO, 9% had TI, and 14% had TI+HO; nine SOMs were identified. Tumors with invasion (i.e., TI or TI+HO) were more likely to be WHO grade II (p: 0.028). Additionally, tumors with invasion were nearly 30 times more likely to harbor NF2 mutations (OR: 27.6; p: 0.004), while hyperostosis only (without frank tumor invasion) were over 4 times more likely to have a TRAF7 mutation (OR: 4.5; p: 0.023). SOMs were a significant predictor of underlying TRAF7 mutation (OR: 10.21; p: 0.004). CONCLUSIONS SWMs with invasion into bone tend to be higher grade and are more likely to be NF2 mutated, while SOMs and those with hyperostosis are associated with TRAF7 variants. Pre-operative prediction of molecular subtypes based on radiographic bony characteristics may have significant biological and clinical implications based on known recurrence patterns associated with genomic drivers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.