Practitioners and scholars have argued that mobilizing the law can play a crucial role in translating human rights principles into transformative changes for rights holders. However, we have only a relatively embryonic understanding of the full range of mechanisms by which strategic legal action might lead to change and the conditions under which it is more or less likely to do so. Current thinking on how to assess legal mobilization has urged scholars and practitioners to pay increased attention to methodological issues. Our research builds on recent work to showcase the variety of mechanisms by which strategic legal action can translate into change. We seek to identify that factors that social justice practitioners should consider at each stage of the litigation process to improve the likelihood of success. We draw on an in-depth case study of mobilization by young migrants in the UK whose immigration status meant they could not access student loans for higher education thus violating their right to education. The analysis draws on a wide range of data including media analysis, organizational documents from the NGO supporting the young people and semi-structured interviews.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.