No abstract

No abstract

BACKGROUNDCauses of early infant growth restriction remain incompletely understood. Where vitamin D deficiency is common, vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy and lactation may improve fetal-infant growth and other birth outcomes.METHODSWe conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of maternal vitamin D supplementation from 17-24 weeks gestation until birth or 6 months postpartum. Participants were randomly allocated to five vitamin D and/or placebo supplementation groups: (A) 0 IU/week, (B) 4200 IU/week, (C) 16800 IU/week, or (D) 28000 IU/week in pregnancy, all with 0 IU/week postpartum; or, (E) 28000 IU/week in prenatal and postpartum periods. The primary outcome was length-for-age z-score at one year of age according to World Health Organization child growth standards.RESULTSAmong 1164 infants assessed at one year of age (90% of 1300 pregnancies), there were no differences across groups in length-for-age z-scores (mean ±standard deviation): A: -0.93 ±1.05, B: -1.11 ±1.12, C: -0.97 ±0.97, D: -1.06 ±1.07, E: -0.94 ±1.00 (p=0.23). Groups were similar with respect to other anthropometric measures, birth outcomes, and morbidity. Vitamin D had dose- dependent effects on maternal and infant serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and calcium, maternal urinary calcium excretion, and maternal parathyroid hormone concentrations. No clinical adverse events were attributed to the vitamin D intervention. CONCLUSIONSIn a population with widespread prenatal vitamin D deficiency and fetal/infant growth restriction, maternal vitamin D supplementation from mid-pregnancy until birth or 6 months postpartum does not influence fetal or infant growth, and has no beneficial or harmful effects on numerous other birth and infant outcomes.

No abstract

Background The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in implementation of public health measures worldwide to mitigate disease spread, including; travel restrictions, lockdowns, messaging on handwashing, use of face coverings and physical distancing. As the pandemic progresses, exceptional decreases in seasonal respiratory viruses are increasingly reported. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on laboratory confirmed detection of seasonal non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viruses in Canada. Methods Epidemiologic data were obtained from the Canadian Respiratory Virus Detection Surveillance System. Weekly data from the week ending 30 th August 2014 until the week ending the 13 th March 2021 were analysed. We compared trends in laboratory detection and test volumes during the 2020/2021 season with pre-pandemic seasons from 2014 to 2019. Findings We observed a dramatically lower percentage of tests positive for all seasonal respiratory viruses during 2020-2021 compared to pre-pandemic seasons. For influenza A and B the percent positive decreased to 0•0015 and 0•0028 times that of pre-pandemic levels respectively and for RSV, the percent positive dropped to 0•0169 times that of pre-pandemic levels. Ongoing detection of enterovirus/rhinovirus occurred, with regional variation in the epidemic patterns and intensity. Interpretation We report an effective absence of the annual seasonal epidemic of most seasonal respiratory viruses in 2020/2021. This dramatic decrease is likely related to implementation of multi-layered public health measures during the pandemic. The impact of such measures may have relevance for public health practice in mitigating seasonal respiratory virus epidemics and for informing responses to future respiratory virus pandemics. Funding No additional funding source was required for this study.

Background The overall global impact of COVID-19 in children and regional variability in pediatric outcomes are presently unknown. Methods To evaluate the magnitude of global COVID-19 death and intensive care unit (ICU) admission in children aged 0–19 years, a systematic review was conducted for articles and national reports as of December 7, 2020. This systematic review is registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020179696). Results We reviewed 16,027 articles as well as 225 national reports from 216 countries. Among the 3,788 global pediatric COVID-19 deaths, 3,394 (91.5%) deaths were reported from low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), while 83.5% of pediatric population from all included countries were from LMIC. The pediatric deaths/1,000,000 children and case fatality rate (CFR) were significantly higher in LMIC than in high-income countries (HIC) (2.77 in LMIC vs 1.32 in HIC; p < 0.001 and 0.24% in LMIC vs 0.01% in HIC; p < 0.001, respectively). The ICU admission/1,000,000 children was 18.80 and 1.48 in HIC and LMIC, respectively (p < 0.001). The highest deaths/1,000,000 children and CFR were in infants < 1 year old (10.03 and 0.58% in the world, 5.39 and 0.07% in HIC and 10.98 and 1.30% in LMIC, respectively). Conclusions The study highlights that there may be a larger impact of pediatric COVID-19 fatality in LMICs compared to HICs.

Summary Background Documentation of the demographic and geographical details of changes in cause-specific neonatal (younger than 1 month) and 1–59-month mortality in India can guide further progress in reduction of child mortality. In this study we report the changes in cause-specific child mortality between 2000 and 2015 in India. Methods Since 2001, the Registrar General of India has implemented the Million Death Study (MDS) in 1.3 million homes in more than 7000 randomly selected areas of India. About 900 non-medical surveyors do structured verbal autopsies for deaths recorded in these homes. Each field report is assigned randomly to two of 404 trained physicians to classify the cause of death, with a standard process for resolution of disagreements. We combined the proportions of child deaths according to the MDS for 2001–13 with annual UN estimates of national births and deaths (partitioned across India’s states and rural or urban areas) for 2000–15. We calculated the annual percentage change in sex-specific and cause-specific mortality between 2000 and 2015 for neonates and 1–59-month-old children. Findings The MDS captured 52 252 deaths in neonates and 42 057 deaths at 1–59 months. Examining specific causes, the neonatal mortality rate from infection fell by 66% from 11.9 per 1000 livebirths in 2000 to 4.0 per 1000 livebirths in 2015 and the rate from birth asphyxia or trauma fell by 76% from 9.0 per 1000 livebirths in 2000 to 2.2 per 1000 livebirths in 2015. At 1–59 months, the mortality rate from pneumonia fell by 63% from 11.2 per 1000 livebirths in 2000 to 4.2 per 1000 livebirths in 2015 and the rate from diarrhoea fell by 66% from 9.4 per 1000 livebirths in 2000 to 3.2 per 1000 livebirths in 2015 (with narrowing girl–boy gaps). The neonatal tetanus mortality rate fell from 1.6 per 1000 livebirths in 2000 to less than 0.1 per 1000 livebirths in 2015 and the 1–59-month measles mortality rate fell from 3.3 per 1000 livebirths in 2000 to 0.3 per 1000 livebirths in 2015. By contrast, mortality rates for prematurity or low birthweight rose from 12.3 per 1000 livebirths in 2000 to 14.3 per 1000 livebirths in 2015, driven mostly by increases in term births with low birthweight in poorer states and rural areas. 29 million cumulative child deaths occurred from 2000 to 2015. The average annual decline in mortality rates from 2000 to 2015 was 3.3% for neonates and 5.4% for children aged 1–59 months. Annual declines from 2005 to 2015 (3.4% decline for neonatal mortality and 5.9% decline in 1–59-month mortality) were faster than were annual declines from 2000 to 2005 (3.2% decline for neonatal mortality and 4.5% decline in 1–59-month mortality). These faster declines indicate that India avoided about 1 million child deaths compared with continuation of the 2000–05 declines. Interpretation To meet the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals for child mortality, India will need to maintain the current trajectory of 1–59-month mortality and accelerate declines in neonatal mortality (to >5% annually) from 2015 onwar...

Growing evidence suggests receipt of live‐attenuated viral vaccines after solid organ transplant (SOT) has occurred and is safe and needed due to lapses in herd immunity. A 2‐day consortium of experts in infectious diseases, transplantation, vaccinology, and immunology was held with the objective to review evidence and create expert recommendations for clinicians when considering live viral vaccines post‐SOT. For consideration of VV and MMR post‐transplant, evidence exists only for kidney and liver transplant recipients. For MMR vaccine post‐SOT, consider vaccination during outbreak or travel to endemic risk areas. Patients who have received antiproliferative agents (eg. mycophenolate mofetil), T cell–depleting agents, or rituximab; or have persistently elevated EBV viral loads, or are in a state of functional tolerance, should be vaccinated with caution and have a more in‐depth evaluation to define benefit of vaccination and net state of immune suppression prior to considering vaccination. MMR and/or VV (not combined MMRV) is considered to be safe in patients who are clinically well, are greater than 1 year after liver or kidney transplant and 2 months after acute rejection episode, can be closely monitored, and meet specific criteria of “low‐level” immune suppression as defined in the document.