Key Points
A novel recombinant factor VIII with prolonged half-life, rFVIIIFc, was developed to reduce prophylactic injection frequency. rFVIIIFc was well-tolerated in patients with severe hemophilia A, and resulted in low bleeding rates when dosed 1 to 2 times per week.
Prophylactic rFIXFc, administered every 1 to 2 weeks, resulted in low annualized bleeding rates in patients with hemophilia B. (Funded by Biogen Idec; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01027364.).
SummaryIn the phase 3 B-LONG (Recombinant Factor IX Fc Fusion Protein [rFIXFc] in Subjects With Haemophilia B) study, rFIXFc demonstrated a prolonged half-life compared with recombinant factor IX (rFIX), and safety and efficacy for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding in subjects with moderately-severe to severe haemophilia B. In this B-LONG sub-analysis, rFIXFc was evaluated for efficacy in subjects requiring major surgery. Dosing was investigator-determined. Assessments included dosing, consumption, bleeding, transfusions and haemostatic response. A population pharmacokinetics model of rFIXFc was used to predict FIX activity. Twelve subjects underwent 14 major surgeries (including 11 orthopaedic surgeries); most subjects (11/12) received rFIXFc prophylaxis before surgery (range, 2 weeks-12 months). Investigators/surgeons rated haemostatic responses as excellent (n = 13) or good (n = 1). In most surgeries (85Á7%), haemostasis from the pre-surgical dose until the end of surgery was maintained with a single rFIXFc infusion. Blood loss was consistent with similar surgeries in subjects without haemophilia. The strong correlation (R 2 = 0Á9586, P < 0Á001) between observed and population pharmacokinetic model-predicted FIX activity suggests surgery did not impact rFIXFc pharmacokinetics. No unique safety concerns or inhibitors were observed. In conclusion, rFIXFc was safe and efficacious, with prolonged dosing intervals and low consumption, when used perioperatively in haemophilia B. Surgery did not appear to alter rFIXFc pharmacokinetics.
Essentials• Congenital afibrinogenemia causes a potentially lifethreatening bleeding and clotting tendency.• Two human fibrinogen concentrates (HFCs) were compared in a randomized pharmacokinetic study.• Bioequivalence was not shown for AUC norm , which was significantly larger for the new HFC.• Increases in clot strength were comparable, and no thromboses or deaths occurred in the study. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 16: 253-261 DOI: 10.1111/jth.13923 increases in clot strength were comparable between concentrates.
The performance of surgery and invasive procedures in patients with haemophilia is currently facing new challenges globally. The first is the appropriate application of low‐dose protocols of clotting factor concentrates (CFC) achieving adequate perioperative haemostasis in resource constraint environments. The increasing availability of CFC through humanitarian aid programmes allows more invasive surgeries to be performed for which efficacy and safety data should be more widely collected and reported. Second, extended half‐life CFC that are increasingly available in many countries represent valuable alternatives to standard half‐life products in surgical patients allowing reduced number of infusions and lower consumption, in particular for extended half‐life factor IX. Third, in the era of recently introduced non‐factor prophylaxis, some minor surgical procedures can now be performed without additional haemostatic treatment, others with few low‐dose administrations of CFC or bypassing agents. Additional factor VIII or bypassing treatment has proven to be safe and effective in association with emicizumab for major surgeries, and it was effectively given at low doses in association with fitusiran. No thrombotic complications have been reported in the surgical setting so far. A multidisciplinary team/facility remains crucial to manage major surgery in patients on prophylaxis with these new agents.
Between 2001 and 2009, 121 patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using a conditioning protocol of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide at three Indian hospitals. Donors were HLA-identical sibling or family donors. Seventy-six patients were considered "high risk" as per criteria. The graft source included peripheral blood stem cells in 109 and G-CSF-stimulated bone marrow in 12. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine and mini-methotrexate. Engraftment occurred in 117 (96.6%) while two had graft failure and two expired in the first two wk. Neutrophil engraftment was seen at 12.3 d (range: 9-19) while platelet engraftment occurred at 12.4 d (range: 8-32). Grade II-IV acute GVHD was seen in 26.7% and grade IV GVHD in 8.6%. Chronic GVHD occurred in 44% and was extensive in 10%. The five-yr overall survival for the entire cohort is 75.8 ± 3.9% with a survival of 95.6 ± 3.1% in the low-risk group (n = 45) and 64.0 ± 5.6% in the high-risk group (n = 76). Conditioning with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide is associated with very good long-term survival in patients undergoing HSCT for SAA.
Context:The distribution of various subtypes of lymphomas in India is different from other parts of the world. There is scarce multicentric data on the pattern and outcomes of lymphomas in India.Aims:The aim of this study is to evaluate the histopathological and the clinical pattern and treatment outcomes of lymphomas in India based on the retrospective data collected from a multicenter registry.Materials and Methods:Retrospective data was collected at 13 public and private hospitals in India for patients diagnosed with lymphoma between January 2005 and December 2009. The data collection was performed in the setting of a multicenter lymphoma registry Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.Results:Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) constituted 83.17% and Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) for 16.83% of the 1733 registered and analyzed cases. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was the most common NHL (55%) followed by follicular lymphoma (11%). CHOP was the most common chemotherapy regimen administered (84%) while rituximab was used in 42.7% of those with DLBCL. Survival analysis of treatment naïve DLBCL patients (n = 791) was performed. Of these, 29% were lost to follow-up, 20% with active disease. The median follow-up in surviving patients is 31 (range: 1-88) months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in DLBCL patients has not reached. There was no significant difference in median PFS (69 months vs. 61 months, P = 0.1341), but OS was significant not reached (NR) vs. NR, P = 0.0012) within international prognostic index high or intermediate subgroups. Rituximab use was associated with significantly prolonged PFS (NR vs. 82 months, P = 0.0123), but not OS (NR vs. NR, P = 0.2214). Cox regression analysis in treatment naïve DLBCL patients showed a performatnce status, stage and receipt of six or more cycles of chemotherapy to be significantly associated with OS and all of the preceding plus rituximab use significantly associated with PFS.Conclusions:Our analysis confirms previous reports of distribution of lymphoma subtypes in India and suggests that patients who are able to receive the full course of chemotherapy achieve a better outcome. This indicates the importance of ensuring compliance to treatment utilizing various measures including patient and family counseling. Prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.