The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) represents an alternative to the current methods for investigating DNA damage and repair in specific genomic segments. In theory, any DNA lesion which blocks Taq polymerase can be measured by this assay. We used quantitative PCR (QPCR) to determine the lesion frequencies produced by cisplatin and ultraviolet light (UV) in a 2.3 kilobase (kb) segment of mitochondrial DNA and a 2.6 kb segment of the DHFR gene in mouse leukemia L1210 cells. The frequency of UV-induced lesions increased linearly with dose, and was 0.58 lesions/10 kb/10 J/m2 in the mitochondrial DNA, and 0.37 lesions/10 kb/10 J/m2 in the DHFR gene. With cisplatin, the lesion frequency also increased linearly with dose, and was 0.17 lesions/10 kb/10 microM in the DHFR gene, and 0.07 lesions/10 kb/10 microM in mitochondrial DNA. This result is contrary to that of Murata et al., 1990 (1), in which mitochondrial DNA received greater cisplatin damage than did nuclear DNA. Using PCR to measure the repair of UV-induced lesions in the DHFR gene segment, we observed that less than 10% of the lesions were removed by 4 h, but over 70% of the lesions were removed by 8 h. Repair of 43% of UV-induced lesions in mitochondrial DNA was also observed during a 24 h period.

In mammals, two TATA-less bidirectional promoters regulate expression of the divergently transcribed dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) and rep3 genes. In CHOC 400 cells, dhfr mRNA levels increase about fourfold during the G1-to-S phase transition of the cell cycle, whereas the levels of rep3 transcripts vary less than twofold during this time. To assess the role of DNA-binding proteins in transcriptional regulation of the dhfr and rep3 genes, the major and minor dhfr-rep3 promoter regions were analyzed by high-resolution genomic footprinting during the cell cycle. At the major dhfr promoter, prominent DNase I footprints over four upstream Sp1 binding sites did not vary throughout G1 and entry into the S phase. Genomic footprinting revealed that a protein is constitutively bound to the overlapping E2F sites throughout the G1-to-S phase transition, an interaction that is most evident on the transcribed template strand. On the nontranscribed strand, multiple changes in the DNase I cleavage pattern are observed during transit through G1 and entry into the S phase. By using gel mobility shift assays and a series of sequence-specific probes, two different species of E2F were shown to interact with the dhfr promoter during the cell cycle. The DNA binding activity of one E2F species, which preferentially recognizes the sequence TTTGGCGC, did not vary significantly during the cell cycle. The DNA binding activity of the second E2F species, which preferentially recognizes the sequence TTTCGCGC, increased during the G1-to-S phase transition. Together, these results indicate that Sp1 and the species of E2F that binds TTTGGCGC participate in the formation of a basal transcription complex, while the species of E2F that binds TTTCGCGC regulates dhfr gene expression during the G1-to-S phase transition. At the minor promoter, DNase I footprints at a consensus c-Myc binding site and three Sp1 binding sites showed little variation during the G1-to-S phase transition. In addition to protein binding at sequences known to be involved in the regulation of transcription, genomic footprinting of the entire promoter region also showed that a protein factor is constitutively bound to the first intron of the rep3 gene.

Previously genomic DNase I footprinting showed changes in protein binding to two overlapping E2F sites correlates with activation of dhfr gene expression at the G 1 /S boundary of the Chinese hamster cell cycle (Wells, J., Held, P., Illenye, S., and Heintz, N. H. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 634 -647). Here gel mobility and antibody supershift assays were used to relate changes in the components of E2F DNA binding complexes in cell extracts to repression and induction of dhfr gene expression. In extracts from log phase cells, E2F complexes contained predominantly E2F-4 and E2F-2 in association with DP-1, and DNA binding assays showed complexes containing E2F-2 preferentially interact with only one of the two overlapping E2F sites. In serum starvation-stimulation experiments, arrest in G 1 by low serum was accompanied by decreased levels of dhfr mRNA and the appearance of an E2F-4⅐DP-1⅐p130 complex. After serum stimulation, induction of dhfr gene expression was preceded by loss of the p130 complex in mid G 1 and coincided with marked increases in two free E2F⅐DP-1 complexes in late G 1 , one of which contained E2F-4 and a second which contained an unidentified E2F. We suggest activation of dhfr gene expression after serum stimulation requires at least two temporally distinct processes, relief of p130-mediated repression and subsequent activation of transcription by free E2F.

Homodinuclear (Pt,Pt) and heterodinuclear (Ru,Pt) metal compounds having the generalized formula M(a)NH2(CH)4NH2M(b) are shown to form specific DNA lesions which can efficiently cross-link proteins to DNA. In this study, the homodinuclear case is represented by M(a) = M(b) = [cis-Pt(Cl2)-(NH3)] and the heterodinuclear case is represented by M(a) = [cis-RuCl2(DMSO)3] and M(b) = [cis-PtCl2(NH3)]. Native and denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was used to show the formation of ternary coordination complexes between the metal-treated 49-bp DNA fragment and the Escherichia coli UvrA and UvrB DNA repair proteins. Treatment with proteinase K results in loss of the DNA-protein cross-links. DNA-protein cross-links formed between UvrA and DNA previously modified with the dinuclear metal compounds are reversible with the reducing agent beta-mercaptoethanol. The DNA lesion responsible for efficient DNA-protein cross-linking is most probably a DNA-DNA interstrand cross-link in which each metal atom is coordinated with one strand of the DNA helix. The formation of DNA repair protein associated DNA cross-links, potential "suicide adducts", suggests a novel action mechanism for these anticancer compounds. In addition, these dinuclear metal compounds should be very useful agents for the investigation of a wide range of protein-DNA interactions.

In mammalian cells reiterated binding sites for Sp1 and two overlapping and inverted E2F sites at the transcription start site regulate the dhfr promoter during the cell growth cycle. Here we have examined the contributions of the dhfr Sp1 and E2F sites in the repression of dhfr gene expression. In serum-starved cells or during serum stimulation, the Chinese hamster dhfr gene was not derepressed by trichostatin A (TSA), an inhibitor of histone deacetylases (HDAC). Immunoprecipitation experiments showed that HDAC1 and hypophosphorylated retinoblastoma protein (pRb) are associated with Sp1 in serum-starved CHOC400 cells. In transfection experiments, reporter plasmids containing the reiterated dhfr Sp1 sites were stimulated 10-fold by TSA, while a promoter containing four dhfr E2F sites and a TATA box was responsive to E2F but was completely unaffected by TSA. HDAC1 did not coprecipitate with p130-E2F DNA binding complexes, the predominant E2F binding activity in cell extracts after serum starvation, suggesting that p130 imposes a TSA-insensitive state on the dhfr promoter. In support of this notion, recruitment of GAL4-p130 to a dihydrofolate reductase-GAL4 reporter rendered the promoter insensitive to TSA, while repression by GAL4-pRb was sensitive to TSA. Upon phosphorylation of pRb and p130 after serum stimulation, the Sp1-pRb and p130-E2F interactions were lost while the Sp1-HDAC1 interaction persisted into S phase. Together these studies suggest a dynamic model for the cooperation of pRb and p130 in repression of dhfr gene expression during withdrawal from the cell cycle. We propose that, during initial phases of cell cycle withdrawal, the binding of dephosphorylated pRb to Sp1-HDAC1 complexes and complexes of E2F-1 -to -3 with DP results in transient, HDAC-dependent suppression of dhfr transcription. Upon withdrawal of cells into G 0 , recruitment of p130 to E2F-4-DP-1 complexes at the transcription start site results in a TSA-insensitive complex that cooperates with Sp1-HDAC-pRb complexes to stably repress dhfr promoter activity in quiescent cells.