Background
Discrepancies between aortic valve area (AVA) and gradients are recognized in patients with AS and normal LVEF and can impact on surgical referral decisions.
Purpose
Pilot study to determine whether using 3D rather than 2D LVOT dimensions leads to fewer discrepancies and less patients diagnosed with severe AS by continuity equation.
Methods
AS was quantified as per BSE guidelines in 55 consecutive patients (M: 32, age: 73±10) with LVEF>50% and at least moderate AS by AVA. LVOT was imaged with 3D zoom and its two orthogonal diameters were used to calculate the LVOT area for the continuity equation.
Results
Severe AS was diagnosed by AVA in 24/55 (44%) patients (Table 1). By 3D measurements the LVOT eccentricity index (D1/D2) was 0.8±0.1 and the LVOT area and SVi were larger than the ones calculated by 2D measurements:3.74±0.7 cm2 vs. 3.29±0.5 cm2 and 51.4±13 ml/BSA, vs. 45.3±9 ml/BSA, respectively, p<0.05. 3D measurements reduced the number of severe AS cases from 24 to 18 (AVA) and from 33 to 24 (AVAi) (25% and 27% respectively, p<0.05). AS severity agreement for all parameters slightly improved from 34/55 (62%) to 37/55/ (67%), p: ns
Conclusions
1) In this pilot study, the use of 3D-derived LVOT measurements reduced by 25% the frequency of severe AS diagnosis.
2) If these results are confirmed in larger studies, use of 3D LVOT measurements may become standard of practice.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding source: None
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.