Background Expansion of the testing capacities for severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 is an important issue in the face of ever-increasing case load. So, there is need of point-of-care diagnostic tests in the existing laboratory capacities for early treatment, isolation, and clinical decision making, especially in resource limited settings.
Materials and Methods This prospective cohort study was conducted at Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. Nasopharyngeal samples and blood samples were collected for antigen and antibody testing. Rapid antigen test was performed as per the kit's instructions. The performance of the kit was compared with the gold standard reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing.
Results Eighty-eight out of 110 patients tested positive by RT-PCR for coronavirus disease 2019 in last 48 to 72 hours were included in the study. Overall, the sensitivity of combined antibody test was 52%, antigen test 26%, and combined sensitivity of both antigen and antibody was 72.7%, respectively.
Conclusion The combo kit needs to be used with caution in low prevalence settings, where cases may be missed.
Poster session 2, September 22, 2022, 12:30 PM - 1:30 PM
Background
Candida is responsible for roughly 96% of all opportunistic mycoses and is a major cause of bloodstream infections (BSIs). The potential for nosocomial spread of Candidemia infections is a new concern concurrent with the rapid expansion of intensive care facilities for COVID-19 patients. With the pandemic of COVID-19 now moving into 2022, it is understood that critically ill COVID-infected patients in the ICUs are commonly infected with highly resistant bacterial and fungal infections.
Objective
To estimate the incidence rates and compare the epidemiology of candidemia in COVID infected and non-infected patients requiring ICU care.
Methodology
In this 2-year retrospective multicentric study, we present the findings on candidemia from the Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI) surveillance network which includes 40 hospitals across India and with special emphasis on differences in the epidemiology of Candidemia in COVID infected and non-infected patients in the pre-COVID (April 2019 to April 2020) and COVID times (April 2020 to April 2021) across this network. We compared the incidence of candidemia between COVID infected and non-infected patients using Poisson regression analysis. Chi-squared (χ2) test was used to test for differences in variables such as gender and 14-day mortality between the patients and Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney) test was used to compare median between the patients.
Results
A total of 628 patients with candidemia were screened from HAI Surveillance Database where 68 patients are COVID infected and 560 non-infected patients from both pre-COVID and COVID periods. Incidence of Candida-associated BSI increased significantly from 1.47 (95% CI, 1.35-1.60) to 3.08 (95% CI, 2.38-3.92) in non-infected and COVID-infected patients respectively, while in CLABSI the rates increased from 2.62 (95% CI, 2.34-2.92) in non-infected to 5.99 (95% CI, 4.30-8.12) in COVID-infected patients. COVID infected patients in the age group (>60 years) were significantly more prone to candidemia compared to non-infected patients. During the COVID period, the maximum time for candidemia to develop (from the time of ICU admission) in COVID-infected patients was shorter (<65 days) than in non-infected patients (>90 days).
Conclusion
We observed an increased incidence of candidemia in hospitalized patients during the COVID period compared with the same during the pre-COVID period.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.