Mesothelioma is a malignancy of serosal membranes. It is most commonly encountered in the visceral pleura with the second most common location in the peritoneum. The diagnosis is very rare and has been linked to toxic exposure to industrial pollutants, especially asbestos. Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) commonly presents with diffuse, extensive spread throughout the abdomen with rare metastatic spread beyond the abdominal cavity. Due to its rarity and nonspecific symptoms, it is usually diagnosed late when the disease burden is extensive. Because pleural mesothelioma is more common than MPM, most research has been on the pleural variant and extrapolated for MPM. While treatment advances have been made for MPM, the disease is universally fatal from either abdominal complications secondary to the spread of disease or starvation.Untreated, the life expectancy is less than a year. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has become the mainstay of therapy with systemic therapies still being developed. We will review the epidemiology of MPM and discuss diagnostic and treatment strategies.

No abstract

In this study, the incidence of neutropenia after HIPEC with 40 mg of MMC was markedly lower than reported in the literature for doses adjusted by BSA or weight. The authors report that GCSF is not necessary for routine prophylaxis of all MMC-HIPEC patients. The findings suggest that a fixed 40-mg dose of MMC allows HIPEC to be performed with less risk of immunosuppression.

Microphthalmia transcription factor (Mitf) is involved in melanocyte development and differentiation. We previously reported that Mitf expression, as detected by immunohistochemical analysis, is an independent prognostic marker in patients with intermediate-thickness melanoma. However, the clinical significance of Mitf expression in melanoma is not well delineated. In this prospective study, we attempted to demonstrate the correlation between Mitf expression in primary melanoma and the sentinel lymph node status and prognosis. We prospectively examined primary cutaneous melanomas from 94 patients undergoing nodal staging by sentinel lymph node biopsy. We quantified the percentage of tumor cells whose nuclei stained with the Mitf antibody visually. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The correlation between Mitf expression and nodal status was evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Here we demonstrate that Mitf expression is directly correlated with both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) over a median follow-up of 28.5 months. The mean DFS and OS in the eight patients whose melanomas did not stain positive for Mitf were 15.75±3.36 months (median, 12 months) and 38.17±5.18 months (median, 29 months), respectively. These results are significantly lower than those for patients who showed evidence of Mitf expression, in whom the mean DFS and OS were 66.1±4.03 months (median, not reached, P=0.0001) and 66.75±38.17 months (median, not reached, P=0.0001), respectively. The mean DFS and OS with greater than 25% (67 patients) of the melanoma cells staining positive for Mitf expression were 78.37±2.78 and 82.38±1.6 months, respectively, compared with 26.37±3.2 months (P=0.0001) and 44.53±4.5 months (P=0.0001), respectively, with up to 25% (27 patients) of cells stained positive for Mitf expression. In addition, there was a significant relationship between Mitf expression and nodal status, as evaluated by sentinel node biopsy. For example, none of the melanomas with greater than 50% Mitf expression had a positive sentinel node biopsy. Our study shows that expression of the molecular marker Mitf in primary cutaneous melanomas is a useful tool in assessing lymph node status. Mitf immunostaining in the primary tumor serves as a reliable predictor of occult lymph node metastases, as well as a favorable prognosticator of DFS and OS in melanoma patients.

There is a lack of report of the delayed major complications in patients undergoing CRS plus HIPEC in the literature. Awareness should be raised among health care providers regarding possible occurrence of such late complications given that many patients undergo CRS plus HIPEC remotely from their localities.

Data indicate a high rate of in vitro resistance to the intraperitoneal chemotherapeutic agents used. In vitro drug sensitivity is not useful in patients undergoing CRS plus HIPEC.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis from hepatocellular carcinoma is well regarded as a poorly treatable malignant disease with rapid decline. Over the past decade, new modalities that combine cytoreductive surgery with perioperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy have been shown to be aggressive local-regional treatments with improved survival. We present a case of a 67-year-old non-cirrhotic woman with peritoneal metastases from hepatocellular caracinoma who was treated with cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Consideration remains individualized, but it can be considered in patients with adequate preservation of liver function, management of their primary hepatocellular caracinoma as well as the localized nature of their peritoneal metastases.

There are limitations to any retrospective review; however; patients deemed to have a limited chance of closure at 4 months did better than expected, either healing or having a wound area reduction at 16 weeks, making their wound care much easier. Prospective studies should be conducted to optimise the treatment algorithm to determine if better clinical outcomes can be obtained for the 'real-life' VLU population.