Background Algorithms for predicting retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) requiring treatment need to be validated in Indian settings to determine if the burden of screening can be reduced without compromising the sensitivity of existing gestation and weight-based cut offs. Objective To evaluate the performance of the available algorithms namely, WINROP (Weight, Insulin-like growth factor I, Neonatal ROP), CHOP-ROP (children’s Hospital of Philadelphia ROP) and ROPScore in predicting type 1 ROP and time from alarm to treatment by each algorithm. Study design Ambispective observational. Setting Tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit in India. Participants Neonates less than 32 weeks or less than 1500 g born between July, 2013 to June, 2019 (N=578), who underwent ROP screening. Primary outcome Sensitivity, specificity and time from alarm to treatment by each algorithm. Results The sensitivity and specificity of WINROP was 85% and 36%, for CHOP-ROP it was 54% and 71%, and for ROPScore it was 73% and 67%, respectively in detecting type 1 ROP. A total of 50/51 (98%) of neonates with type 1 ROP underwent treatment at median gestation of 9 weeks and median time from alarm to treatment by WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore was 7, 7 and 3 weeks, respectively. Conclusion WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore were not sensitive enough to replace the gestational age, weight and risk factor-based screening criteria for type 1 ROP.
Background The diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency (AI) is based on the basal and stimulated levels of serum cortisol in response to the short Synacthen test (SST). In patients with secondary AI (SAI) due to hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis defects, the SST has been validated against the insulin tolerance test (ITT), which is the gold standard. However, injection Synacthen is not easily available in some countries, and endocrinologists often use Acton-Prolongatum (intramuscular [IM] long-acting adrenocorticotropic hormone [ACTH]) in place of Synacthen. There are no studies validating the use of IM-ACTH in children with suspected AI. We evaluated the diagnostic value of the IM-ACTH test against the ITT for the diagnosis of SAI in children. Methods All children with suspected growth hormone deficiency (GHD) undergoing a routine ITT were evaluated using the IM-ACTH test within 1 week. Results Forty-eight patients (36 boys/12 girls, age range: 5–14 years) were evaluated using both the ITT and the IM-ACTH test. Twenty-eight patients had a normal cortisol response (≥18 μg/dL, 500 nmol/L) in the ITT and 20 had low values. In patients with a normal cortisol response on the ITT, the peak value obtained after the IM-ACTH test was higher than that on the ITT (28.7 μg/dL [± 8.8] vs. 23.8 μg/dL [± 4.54], respectively; p=0.0012). Compared to the ITT, the sensitivity and specificity of the IM-ACTH test for the diagnosis of SAI at cortisol cut-offs <18 μg/dL (500 nmol/L) and <22 μg/dL (600 nmol/L) were 57.1% and 92.8%, and 100% and 73.5%, respectively. Conclusions A peak cortisol value <18 μg/dL on the IM-ACTH test is highly suggestive of SAI, whereas a value >22 μg/dL rules out SAI.
ObjectivesTo investigate if intravenous fentanyl or intravenous ketamine can provide adequate analgesia in preterm infants undergoing laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).DesignOpen-label randomised trial.SettingTertiary care institution.ParticipantsPreterm infants who underwent laser photocoagulation for ROP.InterventionsInfants were randomised to receive fentanyl as intravenous bolus dose of 2 µg/kg, followed by an intravenous infusion of 1 µg/kg/hour increased to a maximum of 3 µg/kg/hour or intravenous ketamine as bolus dose of 0.5 mg/kg, followed by further intermittent intravenous bolus doses of 0.5 mg/kg to a maximum of 2 mg/kg in the initial phase and intravenous fentanyl (bolus of 2 µg/kg followed by infusion of 2 µg/kg/hour to a maximum of 5 µg/kg/hour) or intravenous ketamine (bolus dose of 1 mg/kg followed by intermittent bolus doses of 0.5 mg/kg to a maximum of 4 mg/kg) in the revised regimen phase.Main outcome measuresProportion of infants with adequate analgesia defined as the presence of both: (1) all the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised scores measured every 15 min less than seven and (2) proportion of the procedure time the infant spent crying less than 5%.Secondary outcomes included apnoea, cardiorespiratory or haemodynamic instability, feed intolerance and urinary retention requiring catheterisation during and within 24 hours following the procedure.ResultsA total of 97 infants were randomised (fentanyl=51, ketamine=46). The proportions of infants with adequate analgesia were 16.3% (95% CI 8.5% to 29%) with fentanyl and 4.5% (95% CI 1.3% to 15.1%) with ketamine. Ten infants (19.6%) in the fentanyl group and seven infants (15.2%) in the ketamine group had one or more side effects. In view of inadequate analgesia with both the regimens, the study steering committee recommended using a higher dose of intravenous fentanyl and intravenous ketamine. Consequently, we enrolled 27 infants (fentanyl=13, ketamine=14). With revised regimens, the proportions of infants with adequate analgesia were higher: 23.1% (95% CI 8.2% to 50.2%) with fentanyl and 7.1% (95% CI 1.3% to 31.5%) with ketamine. However, higher proportions of infants developed apnoea (n=4; 30.7%), need for supplemental oxygen (n=5, 38.4%) and change in cardiorespiratory scores (n=7; 53.8%) with fentanyl but none with ketamine.ConclusionsFentanyl-based and ketamine-based drug regimens provided adequate analgesia only in a minority of infants undergoing laser photocoagulation for ROP. More research is needed to find safe and effective regimens that can be employed in resource constrained settings.Trial registration numberCTRI/2018/03/012878.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.