Immune reactions are involved in both tumour and normal tissue in response to therapy. Elevated secretion of certain chemokines, exosomes and cytokines triggers inflammation, pain, fibrosis and ulceration among other normal tissue side effects. On the other hand, secretion of tumour-promoting molecules suppresses activity of anticancer immune cells and facilitates the proliferation of malignant cells. Novel anticancer drugs such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) boost anticancer immunity via inducing the proliferation of anticancer cells such as natural killer (NK) cells and CD8+ T lymphocytes. Certain chemotherapy drugs and radiotherapy may induce anticancer immunity in the tumour, however, both have severe side effects for normal tissues through stimulation of several immune responses. Thus, administration of natural products with low side effects may be a promising approach to modulate the immune system in both tumour and normal organs. Resveratrol is a well-known phenol with diverse effects on normal tissues and tumours. To date, a large number of experiments have confirmed the potential of resveratrol as an anticancer adjuvant. This review focuses on ensuing stimulation or suppression of immune responses in both tumour and normal tissue after radiotherapy or anticancer drugs. Later on, the immunoregulatory effects of resveratrol in both tumour and normal tissue following exposure to anticancer agents will be discussed.

As a result of smallpox immunization programs that ended more than 40 years ago, a significant portion of the world's population is not immune. Moreover, due to the lack of anti‐monkeypox drugs and vaccines against monkeypox, the spread of this virus may be the beginning of another challenge. In this study, novel antibodies against monkeypox virus were modeled based on a heavy chain of human antibody and a small peptide fragment. Docking of modeled antibodies with C19L protein showed the range of docking energy, and root‐mean‐square deviation (RMSD) was from −124 to −154 kcal/mL and 4–6 angstrom, respectively. Also, docking of modeled antibodies‐C19L complex with gamma Fc receptor type I illustrated the range of docking energy, and RMSD was from −132 to −155 kcal/ml and 5–7 angstrom, respectively. Moreover, molecular dynamics simulation showed that antibody 62 had the highest stability with the lowest energy level and RMSD. Interestingly, no modeled antibodies had immunogenicity, allergenicity, and toxicity. Although all of them had good stability, only antibodies 25, 28, 54, and 62 had a half‐life of >10 h. Moreover, the interaction between C19L protein and anti‐C19L antibodies (wild‐type and synthetic) was evaluated by the SPR method. We found that K D in synthetic antibodies was lower than wild antibody. In terms of δH°, TδS°, and δG°, the results were consistent with binding parameters. Here, the lowest value of thermodynamic parameters was obtained for antibody 62. These data show that the synthetic antibodies, especially antibody 62, had a higher affinity than the wild‐type antibody.