Introduction: The rate of primary cesarean section is on the rising trend. Vaginal birth after cesarean section can be an alternative to reduce cesarean section worldwide. Antenatal examination and intrapartum monitoring are the most important factors for a vaginal birth after a cesarean section. This study aims to determine the acceptance of vaginal birth after cesarean section trial in a tertiary care hospital in Nepal. Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study carried out in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal, from March 2019 to March 2020. All pregnant women with a previous history of cesarean section meeting Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynecology criteria were included. A trial of labor was conducted on the patients who accepted vaginal birth after cesarean section. Results: A total of 85 cases with previous lower section cesarean section were included in the study. Out of which, 75 (88.2%) refused vaginal birth after cesarean section, and only 10 cases (11.8%) accepted to undergo a trial of labor. Five women (50%) had a successful vaginal birth. Complications were less among the vaginal birth after cesarean section group than the repeat cesarean section group. There was no maternal and neonatal mortality. Conclusions: The acceptance of vaginal birth after cesarean section is very low in this study. No complications were observed among vaginal birth after cesarean section in our study.

Aim: To assess the effects of planned early birth (active treatment within 24hrs) compared to expectant management (without active treatment within 24hrs) for women at term with Prelabor Rupture of Membrane (PROM) on maternal and fetal outcomes. Methods: This is an observational comparative study carried out in all the pregnant women who present in maternity ward of Shree Birendra Hospital with PROM at 37-41 weeks of gestation with vertex presentation during the study period between 13 April 2020 to 13 April 2021.They were randomly placed into (A) active treatment group and (B) expectant treatment group. Group (A) was induced with 25mcg of PGE1 (Misoprostol) depending on cervical score, whereas group (B) was expectantly managed for 24 hrs. PROM to delivery interval, maternal and fetal outcomes were then evaluated in both the groups. Results: 79.5% of group A and 71.8% in group B delivered through vaginal route. 20.5% patients in group A and 28.2% patients in group B underwent Cesarean section. The average PROM to delivery interval was 15.6 hours in group A, as compared to 16.8 hours in group B. Only 2 babies in group B had an Apgar score of less than 7 at five minutes. Subsequently, in both the groups, two babies required NICU admission for respiratory distress syndrome with no neonatal mortality in both the groups. Conclusion: Expectant management up to 24 hours can be safely offered to a woman with term PROM.

Introduction: Pelvic surgery is the most common cause of iatrogenic ureteral injury. The incidence of ureteric injuries varies between skilled and inexperienced surgeons. The study aims to determine the prevalence of ureteric injuries sustained during hysterectomy in a tertiary care center of Nepal. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study involving the women attending the gynecological outpatient department of a tertiary care center of Nepal, for various benign and malignant conditions and later on underwent hysterectomy from June 2019 to June 2020 was done after obtaining ethical clearence from the Institutional Review Committee (Reference No. 245). Convenient sampling method was used. The data were entered in Excel and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 17. Point estimate at 95% Confidence Interval was calculated along with frequency and proportion for binary data. Results: Altogether, 1 (0.63%) (0.55-0.71 at 95% Confidence Interval) out of 159 patients sustained the ureteric injury during hysterectomy in a tertiary care center of Nepal. The injury was seen during the exploratory laparotomy for adnexal mass. The injury was recognized intraoperatively and was repaired with double J stenting. A total of 159 patients were enrolled in the study that had undergone hysterectomy over one year for various benign and malignant conditions. Out of which 21 (13.2%) had undergone surgeries for malignant conditions and 138 (86.79%) for benign conditions. Conclusions: Iatrogenic ureteric is still a major cause of harm and concern in hysterectomy. Patients with ureteric injury should be evaluated and intervened at the earliest.

Aim: To determine the prevalence of anxiety in pregnancy during COVID19 pandemic in Shree Birendra Hospital, Chhauni Method: It is a cross sectional study conducted at Shree Birendra Hospital Chhauni from July to October 2020 following the ethical approval from IRC. All the pregnant women from first to last trimester attending outdoor visit were included; they were asked to fill up Beck Anxiety Index form. The level of anxiety was compared with demographic data like age, race, parity, and period of gestation, education and occupation. Data were analyzed by using SPSS 20 software. Results: A total of 385 presumably uninfected pregnant women were surveyed in 20-40 (28.45±3.95) years age group from 4 to 41 (27.15±9.4) weeks of pregnancy and 55.6% were multipara. Low-grade anxiety was found 99.5% (BAI= 3.06±3.66). Conclusions: Low-grade anxiety was found in almost all pregnant women during covid pandemic and there was no significant difference by demographic variables.

Scar endometriosis following caesarean section is a rare presentation and is characterized by the presence of endometrial glands implants at the incision site. As the patients present with a lump in the abdominal scar, the preoperative diagnosis can be often mistaken with other surgical conditions. We present two cases of post cesarean scar endometriosis. Cyclical pain and scar lump were evaluated both clinically and sonologically; then confirmed by excision biopsy.