Purpose: To understand whether a visit to a Hip/Knee Arthritis Assessment Centre (AC), where non-surgical candidates with arthritis are directed toward community resources and provided with a conservative treatment ''prescription,'' contributes to patients' self-management and ability to access community resources. Methods: A purposive sample of non-surgical patients was contacted 3-10 months after their AC visit. Three focus groups (n ¼ 20) and 20 semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted. Transcripts were systematically coded and analyzed using a qualitative descriptive research methodology. Results: While participants generally reported that the AC visit improved self-management, analysis identified an emergent theme about the inadequacy of conservative management in general, subdivided into two sub-themes related to (1) limited access to high-quality, non-surgical treatment, such as physiotherapy and (2) health care providers' attitudes and approaches, which do not embrace chronic disease prevention and management. Conclusions: An AC visit contributes to arthritis self-management; however, the current health care system does not adequately support conservative treatment of chronic conditions. Treatment guidelines need to be tailored to the local health care context in which they are applied.Key Words: disease management; health services accessibility; osteoarthritis; survey. RÉ SUMÉObjectif: Pour comprendre si une visite à un centre d'é valuation de l'arthrite de la hanche ou du genou, où des personnes qui ne sont pas candidates a grave; une intervention chirurgicale et ont de l'arthrite sont dirigé es vers des ressources communautaires et reç oivent une « ordonnance » portant sur un traitement de conservation, contribue à l'autoprise en charge par les patients et à leur capacité d'avoir accè s aux ressources communautaires. Mé thodes: On a communiqué , pendant 3 à 10 mois aprè s leur visite au centre d'é valuation, avec un é chantillon choisi à dessein de patients non candidats à une intervention chirurgicale. On a organisé trois groupes de discussion (n ¼ 20) et procé dé à 20 entrevues té lé phoniques semi structuré es. Les comptes rendus ont é té codé s systé matiquement et analysé s au moyen d'une mé thodologie de recherche descriptive qualitative. Ré sultats: Les participants ont signalé en gé né ral que les visites au centre d'é valuation amé lioraient l'autoprise en charge, mais l'analyse a dé gagé un thè me é mergent au sujet de l'insuffisance de la prise en charge conservatrice en gé né ral, subdivisé en deux sous-thè mes portant sur (1) l'accè s limité à un traitement non chirurgical de grande qualité comme la physiothé rapie et (2) les attitudes et les approches des fournisseurs de soins de santé qui n'adoptent pas la pré vention et la prise en charge des maladies chroniques. Conclusions: Une visite à un centre d'é valuation contribue à l'autoprise en charge de l'arthrite, mais le systè me de santé actuel n'appuie pas adé quatement un traitement conservateur des problè mes chroni...
Background The role of an advanced practice physiotherapist has been introduced in many countries to improve access to care for patients with hip and knee arthritis. Traditional models of care have shown a gender bias, with women less often referred and recommended for surgery than men. This study sought to understand if patient gender affects access to care in the clinical encounter with the advanced practice provider. Our objectives were: (1) To determine if a gender difference exists in the clinical decision to offer a consultation with a surgeon; (2) To determine if a gender difference exists in patients’ decisions to accept a consultation with a surgeon among those patients to whom it is offered; and, (3) To describe patients’ reasons for not accepting a consultation with a surgeon. Methods This was a prospective study of 815 patients presenting to a tertiary care centre for assessment of hip and knee arthritis, with referral onward to an orthopaedic surgeon when indicated. We performed a multiple logistic regression analysis adjusting for severity to address the first objective and a simple logistic regression analysis to answer the second objective. Reasons for not accepting a surgical consultation were obtained by questionnaire. Results Eight hundred and fifteen patients (511 women, 304 men) fulfilled study eligibility criteria. There was no difference in the probability of being referred to a surgeon for men and women (difference adjusted for severity = − 0.02, 95% CI: − 0.07, 0.02). Neither was there a difference in the acceptance of a referral for men and women (difference = − 0.05, 95% CI: − 0.09, 0.00). Of the 14 reasons for declining a surgical consultation, 5 showed a difference with more women than men indicating a preference for non-surgical treatment along with fears/concerns about surgery. Conclusions There is no strong evidence to suggest there is a difference in proportion of males and females proceeding to surgical consultation in the model of care that utilizes advanced practice orthopaedic providers in triage. This study adds to the evidence that supports the use of suitably trained alternate providers in roles that reduce wait times to care and add value in contexts where health human resources are limited. The care model is a viable strategy to assist in managing the growing backlog in orthopaedic care, recently exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.